Its is an unfortunate fact of life that most (all?) TV shows broadcasting current affairs or news are leftist internationalists who do by compulsion or from a plain misguided belief system - tow the 'no guns' line, 'guns kill', 'a safe society is one with no sport shooting or hunting', 'why do we need guns' (never mind about the un-lawful firearms 'cause we cant control them!)....
The thing that really pi$$es me off is the reporting of not only local but generally incidents in the US where a single person was either fatally or otherwise shot with a GUN
, so either wounded or killed and its headline material here... if however there is (a most terrible dont get me wrong) single or multiple fatality on the roads, it doesnt rate the same 'severity'. Do you reckon the single double or even triple road fatality on our roads in Aus is flashed around the globe? Dont think so. The most repulsive fct is that a persons
mediaworthy life is worth a great deal more if it was ended with a gun.
There is a definite agenda here, pushed by not only the pollies, but also the NGOs and the media.... to reduce the profile of gun owners, demonise the use of guns and ultimately to remove guns from 'society'. The question we need to ask ourselves is WHY? (I'm fairly certain of the answer). The United Nations has had a total disarmament objective, total is everything including small-arms, since its inception and of course only the UN would retain arms... UN member nations have therefor an obligation to move toward that end....
The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. (except from publication 7277)
http://www.un-documents.net/a14r1378.htm (one of many U.N. resolutions)