on_one_wheel wrote:Rumour has it that putting on a uniform doesn't mean your not an opportunistic thieving grub.
Lazarus wrote:That's the way the world works nurofen, one rule for the storm troopers and one for us peasants.
That's why a person with a criminal record for violence and a record of disciplinary charges in the military is considered good recruitment material for NTpol.
That's why they investigate themselves and 99 times out of 100 clear themselves.
on_one_wheel wrote:Rumour has it that putting on a uniform doesn't mean your not an opportunistic thieving grub.
JohnV wrote:I bet the Government sent it all to Ukraine .
JohnV wrote:I bet the Government sent it all to Ukraine .
Fionn wrote:Did any one notice that the NSC is advocating that all ammo purchases be recorded against your licence and they are advocating that records are kept by firearm owners on the amount they have and use.
on_one_wheel wrote:Fionn wrote:Did any one notice that the NSC is advocating that all ammo purchases be recorded against your licence and they are advocating that records are kept by firearm owners on the amount they have and use.
Wankers ... what's their justification on that rubbish?
Fionn wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:Fionn wrote:Did any one notice that the NSC is advocating that all ammo purchases be recorded against your licence and they are advocating that records are kept by firearm owners on the amount they have and use.
Wankers ... what's their justification on that rubbish?
The National Shooting Council claim it would stop ammo getting in the wrong hands and being used against police and the public.
Fionn wrote:It's ironic that the NSC claim to have formed to protect shooters from bad laws and regulations, only to advocate introduction of that very same thing.
And people here support and give them money.
Oldbloke wrote:I don't agree with it being regulated, but would not concern me either.
Oldbloke wrote:I like it when firearm owners knock the NSC. They look silly. In all my years, they gave by far been the most active in helping/defending firearm owners. SSAA, is a laughing stock.
Fionn wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I don't agree with it being regulated, but would not concern me either.
But do you agree with the NSC advocating that it should be though? that's the point.
I don't know of any other shooting/firearm organisation that is advocating this and as I said its ironic they are trying to introduce bad laws while claiming their main goal is to get rid of them.
All the law will achieve is greater monitoring ability for the government to know how much ammo you buy and potentially stockpile.Oldbloke wrote:I like it when firearm owners knock the NSC. They look silly. In all my years, they gave by far been the most active in helping/defending firearm owners. SSAA, is a laughing stock.
I agree the NSC look silly but I don't believe they have been that helpful in defending firearm owners in general, they claim they are and take credit for such, but rarely have they be able to substantiate these claims, but certainly do far more damage then they achieve.
Oldbloke wrote:Fionn wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I don't agree with it being regulated, but would not concern me either.
But do you agree with the NSC advocating that it should be though? that's the point.
I don't know of any other shooting/firearm organisation that is advocating this and as I said its ironic they are trying to introduce bad laws while claiming their main goal is to get rid of them.
All the law will achieve is greater monitoring ability for the government to know how much ammo you buy and potentially stockpile.Oldbloke wrote:I like it when firearm owners knock the NSC. They look silly. In all my years, they gave by far been the most active in helping/defending firearm owners. SSAA, is a laughing stock.
I agree the NSC look silly but I don't believe they have been that helpful in defending firearm owners in general, they claim they are and take credit for such, but rarely have they be able to substantiate these claims, but certainly do far more damage then they achieve.
Pls don't verbal me. NSC has done in 2-3 years what the SSAA and couple of others have done in 30 years.
I was a SSAA member for 26 years. I don't recall them ever publishing in their mags what they did to help shooters.
It was always "behind the scenes". Code for doing SFA
Oldbloke wrote:You must be blind.
SSAA does SFA. Just collects range fees.
SSAA died when Ted Drane died
NSA often goes into bat for shooters.
bladeracer wrote:JohnV wrote:I bet the Government sent it all to Ukraine .
How much .22LR ammo are they going through
JohnV wrote:bladeracer wrote:JohnV wrote:I bet the Government sent it all to Ukraine .
How much .22LR ammo are they going through
I was kind of joking but I thought it was center fire stuff . I saw .243 rounds being used in Ukraine in a video .
Oldbloke wrote:No, show me what SSAA has done.
Like I said in 26 years....zero.
Just go to the NSC Web site, they are doing stuff.
Now, go and argue with your work mates at the police station.
JohnV wrote:The SSAA has done very little to roll back draconian laws that affect hunters . Like letters of permission and Professional standards being applied to amateur shooters . I can't think of a single thing that the SSAA has done that made it easier for me , I can't even get a shot at my range now without a bloody appointment because the SSAA will not build any new ranges in my area . We have the highest gun ownership per person in the country but the poorest facilities to shoot .
bladeracer wrote:JohnV wrote:bladeracer wrote:JohnV wrote:I bet the Government sent it all to Ukraine .
How much .22LR ammo are they going through
I was kind of joking but I thought it was center fire stuff . I saw .243 rounds being used in Ukraine in a video .
I was joking too
I haven't seen details of what he's claiming the ammunition was, but 60,000rds of even 9mm is going to take up a ton of room, and weigh over 800kg, in .308Win it'd be over 1500kg. I'm guessing a lot of it is likely to be rimfire ammo.
Oldbloke wrote:Yep, that's my point.
All SSAA does is operate Ranges. Sad to say nothing in relation to helping shooters of changing/lobbying for better laws.