Tomotron wrote:. If people always hunt from choppers then they must be s**t at actual hunting and are therefore cowards.
Tomotron wrote:Firstly, you should have kindly said please as per basic decency taught by our parents. Secondly, I don't think "Seriously like WTF?" was an appropriate response for you to make. It could have been worded as "Please explain further".
Tomotron wrote:There are hunters out there who rely too much on helicopters to do the work for them. They could just as easily ride on quads or bikes and complete the work in a similar manner while abiding by the honorable sporting aspect of hunting. From an honorable point of view, it is not fair for us hunters to have the "high ground" in a helicopter as it does not give prey the chance to react to us since we have an unnatural line of sight from such a high angle.
Tomotron wrote:Maybe I was wrong about what I was taught in terms of hunting. But still "aerial culling" ends up being unethical and therefore dishonorable to hunters and prey. This article in rare form by the ABC gives an objective example. With respect to animalpest, I just don't agree with the fundamentals of aerial culling.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-15/ ... /103232296
Still being rude and unfriendly like to everyone else on this board Fionn? Does your toxic superiority complex not allow you to say "please" and "thank you"? Is that how a lawyer treats their clients, with utmost contempt? Maybe we should have a vote to permanently ban Fionn for constant toxic behavior to other users.
Thank you Oldbloke, absolutely spot on.
Tomotron wrote:Still being rude and unfriendly like to everyone else on this board Fionn? Does your toxic superiority complex not allow you to say "please" and "thank you"? Is that how a lawyer treats their clients, with utmost contempt? Maybe we should have a vote to permanently ban Fionn for constant toxic behavior to other users.
Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:Still being rude and unfriendly like to everyone else on this board Fionn? Does your toxic superiority complex not allow you to say "please" and "thank you"? Is that how a lawyer treats their clients, with utmost contempt? Maybe we should have a vote to permanently ban Fionn for constant toxic behavior to other users.
Oh, please stop being such a 'Karen.'
In case you forgot, you are the one who was rude and insolent, calling people who shoot from helicopters 's**t at actual hunting and, therefore, cowards.'
I simply called you out on your stupid comment.
Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:Still being rude and unfriendly like to everyone else on this board Fionn? Does your toxic superiority complex not allow you to say "please" and "thank you"? Is that how a lawyer treats their clients, with utmost contempt? Maybe we should have a vote to permanently ban Fionn for constant toxic behavior to other users.
Oh, please stop being such a 'Karen.'
In case you forgot, you are the one who was rude and insolent, calling people who shoot from helicopters 's**t at actual hunting and, therefore, cowards.'
I simply called you out on your stupid comment.
Tomotron wrote:No, I'm calling out those who don't abide by ethical practices especially in the aerial shooting industry and it was not directed at individuals but rather groups. It's really ironic that you're calling me rude and insolent, when you keep starting heated arguments (usually about politics) with other users on here.
Tomotron wrote:If people always hunt from choppers then they must be s**t at actual hunting and are therefore cowards.
Lazarus wrote:Says the person who was so busy trying to sh!t stir, she contradicted herself in successive comments on another thread.
Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:No, I'm calling out those who don't abide by ethical practices especially in the aerial shooting industry and it was not directed at individuals but rather groups. It's really ironic that you're calling me rude and insolent, when you keep starting heated arguments (usually about politics) with other users on here.
You are using the fallacious argument tactic of shifting what you said in order to avoid conceding a point or admitting that your original statement was wrong and a pretty stupid thing to say.
As a reminder to you, this is what you said and what we are discussing and its a long was from what you "think" you said and are now claiming you meant.Tomotron wrote:If people always hunt from choppers then they must be s**t at actual hunting and are therefore cowards.
As for chopper culls, I don't see it as honorable as there's normally a sporting aspect to hunting which gives the prey time to react.
Lazarus wrote::unknown: Oh fionn, sweetheart, I can't recall the exact thread, which of course you will pounce on like a pussycat, I believe it was something about police powers, and I could be wrong, but I think it was locked or deleted because it became acrimonious.
You stated, in your usual manner, that of course they could do something or other, then on another page when someone else tried to put the same point, you jumped in, again with that particilar fionn tone, and derisively contradicted them.
I put the two contradictory comments together and ended the post with
You went strangely quiet and weren't heard from for some time.
We all remember that time fondly.
I apologise that I can't recall exact details for you, but to be honest, you're the sort of person most people try hard to forget.
Tomotron wrote:It's not shifting if you didn't read the other part of my original statement on chopper culling. So you're clearly cherry picking about what you thought I was meaning.
Oldbloke wrote:Back on track pls gents.
I just read on a wank Web site that everything natural is good for you.
Sooo, asbestos, lead, mercury, arsenic are all fine.
Oops, forgot uranium. Lol
Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:It's not shifting if you didn't read the other part of my original statement on chopper culling. So you're clearly cherry picking about what you thought I was meaning.
No I was quoting what you said, nothing more.
But keep trying to backtrack on it and trying to distance yourself.
Fionn wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Back on track pls gents.
I just read on a wank Web site that everything natural is good for you.
Sooo, asbestos, lead, mercury, arsenic are all fine.
Oops, forgot uranium. Lol
Everything is bad for you in wrong amount, its knowing what this amount is and staying within the safe range that is often the hard part.
Tomotron wrote:Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:It's not shifting if you didn't read the other part of my original statement on chopper culling. So you're clearly cherry picking about what you thought I was meaning.
No I was quoting what you said, nothing more.
But keep trying to backtrack on it and trying to distance yourself.
Nope, not backtracking at all and I stand firm. You didn't quote the previous sentence so you're cherry picking!
Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:Fionn wrote:Tomotron wrote:It's not shifting if you didn't read the other part of my original statement on chopper culling. So you're clearly cherry picking about what you thought I was meaning.
No I was quoting what you said, nothing more.
But keep trying to backtrack on it and trying to distance yourself.
Nope, not backtracking at all and I stand firm. You didn't quote the previous sentence so you're cherry picking!
Why would I quote it? My comment was in relation to the sentence that I quoted. Maybe you need to learn what a 'sentence' means.
If you really want I could point out how the previous sentence about helicopter culling was also pretty stupid.
Your sentence that I quoted was a stupid thing to say and no amount of backtracking, deflecting or claiming it was out of context will get away from that fact.
And if you stand by it you stand by stupid statement which deserves to be called out.
As for chopper culls, I don't see it as honorable as there's normally a sporting aspect to hunting which gives the prey time to react. If people always hunt from choppers then they must be s**t at actual hunting and are therefore cowards.
Tomotron wrote:Two sentences which go together in terms of the context and no one else cares on this forum what you think is "pretty stupid". Do you want to continue wasting your time on this petty argument? This might be my last comment on the matter.As for chopper culls, I don't see it as honorable as there's normally a sporting aspect to hunting which gives the prey time to react. If people always hunt from choppers then they must be s**t at actual hunting and are therefore cowards.
Tomotron wrote:Two sentences which go together in terms of the context and no one else cares on this forum what you think is "pretty stupid". Do you want to continue wasting your time on this petty argument? This might be my last comment on the matter.
Fionn wrote:Lazarus wrote::unknown: Oh fionn, sweetheart, I can't recall the exact thread, which of course you will pounce on like a pussycat, I believe it was something about police powers, and I could be wrong, but I think it was locked or deleted because it became acrimonious.
You stated, in your usual manner, that of course they could do something or other, then on another page when someone else tried to put the same point, you jumped in, again with that particilar fionn tone, and derisively contradicted them.
I put the two contradictory comments together and ended the post with
You went strangely quiet and weren't heard from for some time.
We all remember that time fondly.
I apologise that I can't recall exact details for you, but to be honest, you're the sort of person most people try hard to forget.
So you can't recall what thread or what post's it was, maybe it was a little musturbation fantasy you had about how you bested me.
Lazarus wrote:Come on sweetheart, surely you can do better than that, you remember, or maybe you contradict yourself so often you just can't recall which time I'm talking about.
And look, pounced on that like a pussycat just as I predicted.
You're not only a nasty girl, you're tediously predictable.
Once agin, fionns trolling has led another thread into acrimony, perhaps we should consider Tomotron's previous suggestion.
on_one_wheel wrote:All those in favour say I
I
Anyhow, wasn't there an Australian company making solid copper projectiles?
on_one_wheel wrote:All those in favour say I
I
Anyhow, wasn't there an Australian company making solid copper projectiles?