The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by MeccaOz » 22 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm

Oldbloke wrote:
MeccaOz wrote:Im the same Harper, but yeah I can see the body recovery angle.... But it's my understanding crocs stuff there kills underwater somewhere till it rots up some, so the body may not have been in the croc anyways... Like I tell people, the day I get chased across the road by shark is the day i'll start killing them. Similar theory on crocs, if they come into my house then i'll start fighting back.

Im ok with self defence, I think even those buggers in parliament r ok with it too. Not sure about the greenies though! !


LOL a typical greenie would forfeit his/her whole family to a croc, sorry but I have very little respect for the green/red brigade.
User avatar
MeccaOz
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1013
Western Australia

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by tom604 » 23 Aug 2014, 9:31 am

Westy wrote:
wrenchman wrote:in the south east we have a snake called the water moccasin that is scarryer then the gaters.
But you guys have lots of nasty snakes

Yep and most of them live in Canberra, there's a whole house dedicated to them!!!!! :lol: :) :lol:


not nice!! very bad form comparing snakes to pollie's, now slugs on the other hand :lol:
User avatar
tom604
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1053
South Australia

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Warrigul » 23 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm

This may stir it up but if it is not endangered then it is only an animal and I am quite happy to kill it once it has killed one of us.

I have nothing against keeping the numbers of potentially deadly animals down in proximity to humans either.

I respect snakes but not when they are around the house, I couldn't care less whether I had entered its environment or not.

Be it sharks, crocs, snakes, spiders, fire ants, european wasps, jack jumpers or zombie possum in numbers near humans then I am all in favour of thinning out them out a bit.
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Westy » 23 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm

At last someone else with a few brains let me guess your 50 something right????I know I grew up in a different world ( mine had oxygen) to most but human lives are way ahead of some crappy animal!!!!!! :evil: :twisted: :evil: We now live in a world were animals have been humanised and we all have equal rights!!!

Pigs Ass
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
User avatar
Westy
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1276
Queensland

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Warrigul » 23 Aug 2014, 8:29 pm

Mid forties but raised on a farm.

I got an extra bullet for every rabbit I shot when I was 10. We ate a lot of lamb and chicken and I watched every bit I ate being killed. We also killed two porkers and smoked and hung our own ham and bacon.

I am a firm believer that there is a place on earth for all god's animals: Right next to the mashed potatoes and peas.

Did you know that PETA are trying to describe fish as sea kittens in an attempt to make them appealing to the general population? Also that they are now starting to say that vegetables feel pain(what are they going to eat?)


I can respect a true VEGAN as standing by their beliefs but I cannot stomach those hypocrites amongst us who place animals over humans but still eat chicken and meat from abbatoirs and wear leather shoes.

Rant over, i'm gonna make a couple of smoked pigs belly sandwiches and wash it down with some fermented screaming vine baby juice(wine).
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Westy » 23 Aug 2014, 8:56 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ha-Ha-Ha ^^^^^^^^^^^
I like the Boy!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
User avatar
Westy
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1276
Queensland

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by bigfellascott » 24 Aug 2014, 5:15 am

I say shoot the bastard, I'd like a pair of boots made out of him when their finished poking around in him and a jacket (he's big enough)! :D
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by 1290 » 24 Aug 2014, 9:29 am

Warrigul, I'm quite frankly offended by your views, we've come so far as a modern society and you STILL eat the earth's bounty with freakin mashed taters.... try a roast of onions, Brussell sprouts, and red peppers (along with the spuds), slowly roast with plenty of olive oil (dont be tight) and salt...... THAT will mix it up with the flavours for you :D

But yes, ultimately a bit of reason is percolating out of this thread. The reality of humans as the ultimate predator on this land has been forgotten, yes, we need to control the sharks, the crocs, yes and also the snakes and spiders TO KEEP THIS PLACE SAFE FOR US....

The crocs in the NT must be controlled, I dont think its acceptable to say that there are places where we cant go, that concept smack of the Wildlands project, ya herd of that? all it is, is the greentard vegan brainless gang's utopian wet dream, I shall elucidate for you;

Back before the birth of modern environmentalism or envirosocialism (read quasi-communism from the literal ground up) before the anti-human-activity Rio earth summit of 92, there was a body of work around the various concepts that 'they' considered necessary to save the globe - read control every aspect of our lives and send our quality of lives back several generations. It was decided that we humans had to be removed from 'nature' to restore the (this words sends shivers down my spine when spoken) biodiversity.....

To cut a long story short, there has been significant energy expended in seeking to remove humans from vast swathes of the earth, (check out the USA wildlands map), to reintroduce species to where people would normally be found, the yanks on here will be well aware of the programs to bring back the mountain lion, wolves etc. Google wildlands project and see that these lunatics want to create small localised concentrated areas for the 'humans' and the rest as mostly no-go zones for us to allow the regeneration and reinroduction of the 'biodiversity'.

When it comes to implementing these enviro-social controls, dont think you're immune in the local sense - the UN as the policy driving force specifically targets local government as the closest to the ground to implement these policies, have a look at your local planning scheme and you'll find that biodiversity has well and truly permeated your local planning laws. example, requirement to plant indigenous / native species of plant under a planning permit... yep, returning the biodiversity of pre-human times...one planning permit at a time.

No, its not fiction, I didnt just dream this up, so yes, control the Crocs, the snakes, the spiders, wear your leather jacket and real fur coat, throw away your fake croc skin boot, take the earth back, WE are in charge around here F#$% the enviro-socialists.
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Westy » 24 Aug 2014, 11:47 am

Biodiversity.....The New "West Dictionary" describes this as " A simple way to control the average Mug Punter into believing everything that is shovelled down his or her throat as the unwritten gospel while at the same time empowering the top echelons of the unscrupulous Environmental movements to generating as much of the Tax payers Hard Earned $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
for their lazy self-righteous selves."

Bloody love that Dictionary of mine!!!! :ugeek: :mrgreen: :geek:
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
User avatar
Westy
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1276
Queensland

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by wrenchman » 25 Aug 2014, 6:01 am

if they wanted biodiversity they would hunt them larg crocs they eat there young and are territorial
wrenchman
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1347
United States of America

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Harper » 25 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm

Warrigul wrote:This may stir it up but if it is not endangered then it is only an animal and I am quite happy to kill it once it has killed one of us.


We're only animals. By that logic we should be quite happy for them to kill us as we've killed tonnes of them. Fair's fair.

People are happy to animals all day long, but when an animal kills a person it's this huge shock like the world has gone topsy-turvy. Makes no sense at all. I know people like to think we're special and above everything else but it's bulls**t.

I got no problems killing a croc for food, defending yourself, protecting livestock or anything like that. Going after things in situations like this though is nothing but spite.

If I go into a bear cave I expect to get eaten by a fkn bear. I don't expect the bear to be friendly then get shocked and offended and want to punish it when it tries to kill me.
Savage 14/114 American Classic 30-06 Springfield
Savage Axis 25-06 Remington
User avatar
Harper
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 281
Northern Territory

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Westy » 25 Aug 2014, 5:44 pm

Well good for you. We all know what you think, even if it's a little twisted!

Are there many Bears in the N.T.?

Tell me are you a troll looking for a rise?
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
User avatar
Westy
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1276
Queensland

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Harper » 25 Aug 2014, 7:42 pm

No bears last I checked.

No trolls either. If you can't see my point with the bear cave example (maybe not the best) I don't know how else to explain it to you. Pretty straight forward as far as I'm concerned.

Anyway, I had my rant so that'll do me for this.
Savage 14/114 American Classic 30-06 Springfield
Savage Axis 25-06 Remington
User avatar
Harper
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 281
Northern Territory

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Warrigul » 25 Aug 2014, 7:46 pm

Harper wrote:
Warrigul wrote:This may stir it up but if it is not endangered then it is only an animal and I am quite happy to kill it once it has killed one of us.


We're only animals. By that logic we should be quite happy for them to kill us as we've killed tonnes of them. Fair's fair. Nope I place a human life above an animal's

People are happy to animals all day long, but when an animal kills a person it's this huge shock like the world has gone topsy-turvy. Makes no sense at all. I know people like to think we're special and above everything else but it's bulls**t. Well yes we are above animals, that is why we farm them and eat them(nothing will ever beat a natural sausage casing), we also wear their skins(I love a good leather outfit and whips) and use them as beasts of burden, this is the natural order of things.

I got no problems killing a croc for food, defending yourself, protecting livestock or anything like that. Going after things in situations like this though is nothing but spite. You may call it spite but in actual fact destroying a man eater is reducing the future threat to humans. Nothing stopping you eating all the ones you kill in error if you really want to, I have never tried croc but I am told they go well marinated in plum sauce and ginger then stir fried with snow peas and asian greens- you are gonna want a few bottles of plum sauce

If I go into a bear cave I expect to get eaten by a fkn bear. I don't expect the bear to be friendly then get shocked and offended and want to punish it when it tries to kill me. If you so fecking stupid that you would go into a bears cave then I really feel sorry for the bear- cos I am gonna cull it in spite of it having been senselessly provoked by a halfwit, whilst I value human life some human lives I value more than others- if it assuages your conscience I am willing to allow you to add yours to that darwinian quota that needs filling in order for the species to progress]


Okay, we are all entitled to our opinions, I have stated mine and that is I place more value on a human life than an animal.

You on the other hand place more value on an animal than a human, you may feel it is justified to call my opinion bullshite and that is also your right.

I am contracted to cull 50 wallaby tonight but just to make a point about the natural order I will throw another ten in just to show I have no heart and am an utter bastard.

No seriously, I see where you are coming from but unless you are going to go vegan then spare me the hypocrisy. :lol:

(no malice intended and all said with a smile)
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: The philosophy of hunting down 'man eaters'

Post by Harper » 26 Aug 2014, 2:01 pm

Should have phrased the bear scenario a bit differently to not make myself sound like a Darwin Award candidate :lol:

If some idiot goes into a bear cave they shouldn't be surprised if they get eaten by a bear. To get shocked and punish the bear afterwards is stupid.

Same for swimming in a sharks water.

Or being at a crocs river bank.

Anyway... everyone's said their piece, no need to go on about it. A good day to all.
Savage 14/114 American Classic 30-06 Springfield
Savage Axis 25-06 Remington
User avatar
Harper
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 281
Northern Territory

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics