At what cost to protect yourself?

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: At what cost to protect yourself?

Post by Techc » 26 Sep 2014, 11:13 am

Die Judicii wrote:Try walking into a bank with a motor cycle helmet on and see how far you get.


You get to the floor?
.223 Remington Savage Model 12 FV
.308 Remington 700 SPS tactical
Leupold VX-3 6.5-20x40mm
User avatar
Techc
Private
Private
 
Posts: 93
South Australia

Re: At what cost to protect yourself ??

Post by 1290 » 26 Sep 2014, 4:50 pm

cavok wrote:
1290 wrote:Its not about whether we have the right to self defence, thats a given; its about the right to carry 'something' to aid in our defence...pepper spray, firearms whatever.....


I am uncertain if you actually, with respect, actually understand what is written. The right to defend yourself is just that. "A person may use such force as he" etc, 462a of the crimes act. Read and understand, this is a silly subject, its there know it and use what you will. Stop looking for more than there is, "reasonable and proportionate" leave it at that and walk away. I like your statement that it's a given, if you know that, then why ask?


Hey, I dont need to when I've got you to interpret it for me :roll:
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: At what cost to protect yourself?

Post by Utcherd » 27 Sep 2014, 8:11 am

Techc wrote:You get to the floor?


"escorted" to the floor :lol:
User avatar
Utcherd
Private
Private
 
Posts: 81
New South Wales

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics