NSW Greens firearms policy - Discrimination galore

[pajamatime]

I absolutely 200% second the above

[Carter]

Just don't text that while driving

They're sure slamming people for that now.

4 points and about $400.

[gherx]

The Greens support surprise, warrantless inspections on the private homes of law-abiding firearms owners – but think drug sniffer dogs are an ‘invasion of privacy’!

Spot the people who like to smoke a little pot now and then

[RoginaJack]

This is now long overdue for sporting organisations AND other political parties to seriously question the Greens on the costings and enforcement of their ridiculous policies.
Quick frankly, I'm over them; they just pull rubbish out of the air and the stupid followers swallow it hook, line and sinker, not one of them dares question the dribble that they spew out.
Cheers, .

[chacka]

15.3 Demonstrate safety knowledge;

Demonstrate knowledge?

That's f***ing rich coming from the Greens

[RoginaJack]

Revised March 2014

Principles

The Greens NSW believe:

2. Public policy should be underpinned by World Health Organisation standards and the resolutions outlined Australasian Police Ministers Council Agreement on Firearms;

I find item No. 2 very interesting as under World Health Organisation Standards does that mean that the Greens Public Policy will support guns being fitted with noise suppressors? Tests no doubt will prove that loud noises can affect the hearing of people in the vicinity and guns fitted with noise suppressors would prevent this.

Good one Greens.

[nords]

What's the bet none of them have read the WHO standards

[1290]

What's the bet none of them have read the WHO standards

You are making a huge assumption to begin with..... that any of them can READ they are collectively as sharp as a single bowling ball - their Senate spokesperson believes 'Sea Patrol' was a real life reality program...classic, she's so freakin stupid... and annoying , I reckon they keep Sarah Hansen-dumb on for entertainment value only....

[nords]

My bad

[Baronvonrort]

With 21- 21.1 where do they expect rural people to keep guns?

Do they have to drive a few hundred KM to pick up bolt and rifle and hope the feral pest is still there when they return, do they have to do all that driving again t return the gun?

I keep sending David Shoebridge ban 1080 petitions and ask where the greens stand on this cruel and inhumane poison.

I think he is slowly softening-
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/stor ... eir-sights

[1290]

How is she softening?? where in the story is there anything that resembles support for rec shooters? in fact the opposite.
--------------------------

The Greens are backing the hunting of deer on the Illawarra escarpment as part of a move to get serious about eradicating the pest animals.

In what may come as a surprise to some, the Greens have called for publicly funded professional hunters to be brought in,[<that does not include you and I] legislation to be relaxed to remove restrictions on deer hunting, and a mix of contraception and sterilisation employed to keep numbers down.[<yes, they continue to push this utterly ridiculous, catch, sterilise, release idea]

Campaigning in Wollongong on Wednesday before the NSW election, Greens firearms spokesman David Shoebridge said deer should no longer be given game status for recreational hunting, and should be treated as a pest.[<not that they can be hunted by rec shooters]

He wants the scrapping of laws which prohibit using spotlights and attractant devices to hunt deer, and their culling no longer done on an ad-hoc basis by recreational hunters.

Deer's popularity as a target for hunters had meant strong steps to eradicate pest deer had not been taken,[<in other words theyre a problem because of rec hunters hunting them!] Mr Shoebridge said, and the NSW government's approach of allowing amateur [<the not very subtle use of this word amateur by the greens has the intention of painting RECREATIONAL hunters as less skilled, less able and of course less 'safe' than the opposite being of course professional] hunters to kill deer had poor results for animal welfare.[<because of course they have proof of this....not]

"We want to get rid of the artificial restrictions that mean the professional, skilled and humanely oversighted shooters [<there it is, as opposed to amateur hunters] are unable to engage in population control,[<not hunting!]" he said. "The best solution that's available now is a human RSPCA [<you know, the mob who control rabbits by flooding the warrens with grout to humanely suffocate and drown the rabbits!! ]-oversighted culling program with professional shooters, but that needs to be coupled with a significant investment in non-lethal control measures, because the non-lethal control measures are the things that work year-in, year-out."[<insert smily incorporating vertically reciprocating closed hand]

Mr Shoebridge said the cost would be between $2 million and $4 million [<as opposed to a $0 rec hunting program ] to get the program started over a number of years.

--------------------------

The greentards will NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER support any activity that promotes shooting, involves shooting, guns, recreational hunting......

There are a LOT of generally f***ed up things they will support, the use of guns in the community AINT one of them.

[Chronos]

Had to laugh at this one



And I quote "There's no place for discrimination in Australia...."

Unless you're a LAFO

Chronos

[Baronvonrort]

How is she softening?? where in the story is there anything that resembles support for rec shooters? in fact the opposite.
--------------------------

The Greens are backing the hunting of deer on the Illawarra escarpment as part of a move to get serious about eradicating the pest animals.


Mr Shoebridge said the cost would be between $2 million and $4 million [<as opposed to a $0 rec hunting program ] to get the program started over a number of years.

-----

The greentards will NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER support any activity that promotes shooting, involves shooting, guns, recreational hunting......

There are a LOT of generally f***ed up things they will support, the use of guns in the community AINT one of them.

In NSW you need a Category R Game license to hunt Deer, how many recreational hunters do you think we have with Cat R game license in NSW who have sat the test and paid the fee.

I cannot hunt Deer because I don't have this Category R endorsement.

Yes the Greens are bad and should be put dead last on every ballot paper.

[1290]

Dont worry, after the revolution (Hi ASIO ) we'll sort everything out...

FEDERAL government have ZERO CONSTITUTIONAL license to legislate for 'the environment'. Yes, I know thats a huge concept that sounds foreign to accepted logic....

.... and therefore the states can also 'de-regulate' all matters public land related, as far as I'm concerned that involve activities that dont 'injure' others {legal meaning of injure fellas}

The FEDs publish an overview with the actual text of the Commonwealth Constitution that includes such fictional concepts as follows;

Commonwealth Legislative Powers
The Constitution confers the power to make laws on the Commonwealth Parliament. However, the power of the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws is limited to particular subjects. Most of these subjects are listed in sections 51 and 52. They include defence; external affairs; interstate and international trade; taxation; foreign, trading and financial corporations; marriage and divorce; immigration; bankruptcy; and interstate industrial conciliation and arbitration.
This list of powers given to the Commonwealth Parliament does not expressly refer to a number of important subjects including education, the environment, criminal law, and roads – but this does not mean that those subjects are wholly outside the Parliament‘s powers. For example, even though the Commonwealth Parliament has no specific power in relation to the environment, it can, under its external affairs power, prohibit the construction of a dam by a State if that is necessary to give effect to an international agreement on the environment. The legislative powers of the Commonwealth Parliament can also be expanded by the Parliaments of the States referring matters to the Commonwealth Parliament under section 51(xxxvii).

So in other words there excuse for creating the Federal Environment office and imposing all the restrictions including Marine and land parks and the accompanying Multi-billion dollar budget expenditure, parliamentary environment officer anf officers, minister, deputies, assistants, spokes people, endless propaganda and of course the environmental saviours, the greens.......

is to comply with international agreements. Neither for the matter of environment itself nor the well-being of the people or flora or fauna....the old United Nations ...
Remember when we wanted to de-list the UNESCO heritage listed forests in Tassy, ye that one, we were PREVENTED by a panel of foreigners who decided that we could NOT choose to do what we wanted with OUR lands...starting to smell a rat? dont dare read the actual UNESCO treaty then...

DON'T believe anything you think.

[creet]

And I quote "There's no place for discrimination in Australia...."

No persecution.They just want tolerance for all........... of their views.

[adam]

Why not.... same theory.

[brett1868]

Semiauto matches, hope you have Cat D license or the tards will be kicking your door in any second now.

[happyhunter]

Ummm, yeah. The greens are anti gun ownership.

[Gwion]

Semiauto matches, hope you have Cat D license or the tards will be kicking your door in any second now.

I think Cat D is the butane jet jobbies.
Agricultural property owners and their employees can have the common BIC. Most of us are stuck with the standard match but can apply for exception to use the longer 'fire starter' matches and fire lighters if we can prove that combustion stoves are our only form of heating. All existing bbqs and other gas burners need to be retro fitted with a piezo, though.

[Gwion]

Semiauto matches, hope you have Cat D license or the tards will be kicking your door in any second now.

I think Cat D is the butane jet jobbies.
Agricultural property owners and their employees can have the common BIC. Most of us are stuck with the standard match but can apply for excemption to use the longer 'fire starter' matches and fire lighters if we can prove that combustion stoves are our only form of heating. All existing bbqs and other gas burners need to be retro fitted with a piezo, though.

[Gwion]

oops. Edit, not quote.