Newdave wrote:Sam wake up buddy. This is part of a much bigger agenda to move all lever , pumps and even straight pulls to cat c . They just used the Adler to push there agenda in the media. This is just the start.
trekin wrote:When will you lot realise that Abbot wading in at this time, has nothing to do with making society safer from criminal/terrorist acts, but has everything to do with saving face. There is only one thing Abbot is running scared of, and that is;
There are NO Adler shot guns in Aus at all at this time, (apart from those with NIOA for testing) , there are 7000 ready to be imported and sold to suitably authorised LAFOs, that is to say that ALL 7000 Adler’s will be accounted for from the moment their arrive on our shores. If ONE Adler should be found to have been used in a criminal/terrorist act that cannot be traced back to have been stolen from a LAFO, then that, alone, blows the anti’s, political parties, senate inquiry and anyone else who asserts that firearms used in crime are stolen from us OR NOT HANDED IN BACK IN ‘96, out of the water, and WILL prove conclusively and beyond ANY doubt that the Aus boarders are as porous as people have been saying and that customs and boarder security are not up to the job of keeping Aus citizens safe.
And it is for this very reason that this ban, and any further restriction arising from the ANF review, must have its validity contested in court. The Govt must be held accountable, and prove that these laws work and do make Aus a safer place for its citizens.
pajamatime wrote:where is the official info on this...main stream media are difficult to believe.
Edit: its not a ban per say its a suspension by the looks of it. to my knowledge it may not have even occurred or it could just be someone getting real excited about something he said that may suggest hes going to?
valkyrie wrote:so when do we sue?
DML wrote:Imagine the compensation that the Federal Government will have to pay NIOA (after NIOA sues them and wins). More of our taxpayer funds put to good use.
At least we can rest easy knowing the criminals will continue to use semi-auto handguns and the 1996-restricted pump action shotguns.
bigfellascott wrote:pajamatime wrote:where is the official info on this...main stream media are difficult to believe.
Edit: its not a ban per say its a suspension by the looks of it. to my knowledge it may not have even occurred or it could just be someone getting real excited about something he said that may suggest hes going to?
It will be a ban mate, limited to Cat C so effectively banning it from the Majority, which is what they wanted all along, they won't ban it outright but as I said restrict it to the higher categories which in effect is banning it (for the majority).
trekin wrote:bigfellascott wrote:pajamatime wrote:where is the official info on this...main stream media are difficult to believe.
Edit: its not a ban per say its a suspension by the looks of it. to my knowledge it may not have even occurred or it could just be someone getting real excited about something he said that may suggest hes going to?
It will be a ban mate, limited to Cat C so effectively banning it from the Majority, which is what they wanted all along, they won't ban it outright but as I said restrict it to the higher categories which in effect is banning it (for the majority).
When Abbot directs Customs to get involved, then it is effectively a ban.
Baronvonrort wrote:
There will be no second hand market for lever/pump action if they are reclassified into Cat C or D, they have nothing but an irrational fear to justify this.
Pennsylvania Yank wrote:From reading the article, I suspect that it's a quite easy for your executive branch to suspend importation of a gun made overseas. The same thing is happening here in the US under a hostile administration where the perfectly legal M1 Garand is being banned from importation from South Korea because "Many may fall into the wrong hands"...
It's clear from the verbiage of various anti-gun articles I've read, including this latest, that your gun grabbing elites think 1.Category A in general is a regrettable nuisance at best, and at worst is a huge danger to society, and 2.Lever action shotguns are a brand new technology.
I wish you luck, but I assume those who publicly voice their support for owning such a weapon during this "review period" will be quickly isolated, demonized, vilified and dismissed.
Question though. I wonder what the hysterical left will do if and when Adler starts making a 5 round shotgun in the same configuration for possible importation? Would this help open the door for moving all lever actions to another more restrictive category, or would it be considered category A? My bet is on the former.
bluerob wrote:I'm hoping that all of the associations that represent shooters are able to "get it together" and start pushing harder back against anti gun lobbies. In view of what Mr Abbott is attempting, is that really happening?valkyrie wrote:so when do we sue?
Gwion wrote:You have it pretty well summed up.
Our only real chance is to bring the neutral majority on side purely on the principle of abating the undermining of our freedoms as a society as a whole.