happyhunter wrote:Rationalise it anyway you like, If you like hunting, killing is a part of the exercise. If you like seeing the result of a well placed shot, seeing that fox go instantly to "sleep" without a whimper, the satisfaction that comes with the stalk, the shot, the taking of the animals life then you enjoy the killing and there is no amount of rationalising that is going to hide that fact.
He does have a point. It's not just the taking of animal's life that would give somebody satisfaction, its the good effect of what happens after when you need to snuff it's life that can be labelled satisfaction. It isn't like what anti-hunters say when they go on about 'hunters are bloody thirsty', because obviously they don't have half a braincell to rub on the situation.
General go-about with both fishing/hunting is we wait, we choose to try and take it, if we are successful in taking it, we make sure we give it a humane death and then do what we chose to do with it when it's dead. If it's for meat, we get satisfaction for bagging and preparing our own game to be cooked up. If it's a feral pest, we get satisfaction knowing we're doing the native animals and the land a good favour. If we have to put an animal down, it's a lot better to know it died a quick near-painless death instead of living in agony in its final moments.
If I had to be an game animal like a sambar or a buffalo, I would rather have a quick humane death of a hunter's round then die of starvation or heat exhaustion in the middle of nowhere.