Jandamurra wrote:If I ever argue with people about this again, I will ask them why police have weapons if weapons only make things worse-or the military, for that matter.
People have a tendency to take things completely out of context, or just a snippet with no supporting background and then believe it as cold hard fact.
In this case, they are taking the fact that many people are known to have their own weapon used against them in an assault. This is because many people are under the delusion that simply having the weapon and some vague idea how to use it gives them the protection they need. The reality is that to successfully defend your self with any weapon you need three things:
1/ the weapon
2/ effective training in it's proper use and application
3/ the willingness and ability to use it effectively in a necessary situation.
Many, many people do not have the 2nd &/or 3rd requisites and some simply will never acquire them. In these cases, having a weapon does indeed 'just make things worse', because if the attacker was previously unarmed, they have now just been armed by and ineffective display of weaponry.
It is actually well documented by many law enforcement agencies but is very poorly understood by the general public.