juststarting wrote:Names, who, etc. That's what I am asking.
Oldbloke wrote:I HOPE LIKE HELL IT IS A HUNG PARLIMENT.
Tiger650 wrote:Malcolm Turnbull is widely regarded within the Lib rank and file as a Fabian Socialist imposed upon them by a corrupt caucus.
Oldbloke wrote:juststarting wrote:Names, who, etc. That's what I am asking.
In the senate,
Katter
Shooters fishers party
Ricky Muir
Xenophone
Liberal democrats
Even one nation
To name a few.
The greens, liberal, labor all last. They are out of touch and screw the average punter. Driven by self interest intead of "what they can do for the country"
When a single party has control of both houses it is a DICTATORSHIP.
I HOPE LIKE HELL IT IS A HUNG PARLIMENT.
<<Genesis93>> wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I HOPE LIKE HELL IT IS A HUNG PARLIMENT.
...and when you say hung... do you mean hung or HANGED....??
I fully support jobs growth too!
Theres at least a couple of weeks worth of work for a gang of carpenters
<<Genesis93>> wrote:What or who is APA?
Yes, SSAA takes the 'safe' middle ground of apolitique....
They, as an org prefer the status quo.
Member-Deleted wrote:I can understand people not wanting to vote, in some cases, especially in the lower house, there is bugger all choice, but in the senate, there is a good range of choice.
Shooters should consider giving their vote to one of the pro firearm parties, there are three that have dedicated pro firearm policies, the SFFP, LDP and Country Minded.
There are those that don't have specific pro firearms policies, yet can be considered as supportive of shooters such as the KAP.
There are some parties that while not being described as pro firearms , are not really against us either, such as Family First and One Nation.
There are those that have expressed sentiments that could be considered as being anti firearm such as Jacqie Lambie Network and the Glen Lazarous Party.
Then there are the obvious demons foremost being the Greens and Labor, followed by the Mature Australia Party and the Coalition.
Those shooters that do not intend to vote at all, I can only ask that they consider at least voting in the upper house, (senate) and vote for the pro shooting parties, even if they put in an informal vote in the lower house, at least it gives a pro shooting party the chance to get a senator up, which is a good chance in NSW.
By giving your number 1 vote to the SFFP, it will send a message that you are voting on shooting issues as a shooter, even if you prefer another pro shooting party, still consider giving your second preference to the SFFP.
If the SFFP get a strong primary vote count, this will be noticed by who ever forms government, hopefully it will make them aware that there is significant support for shooting and hunting and less likely to want to annoy us.
Tiger650 wrote:I voted on Wednesday, will be on the road on Saturday.
Senate paper completed correctly but I made my own for the lower house, crossed out the usual suspects and wrote :
1 Don Trump
2 Vlad Putin
I had considered making Kim Jong Un # 3 but I seriously hate communists.
As previously stated, if a noticeable fraction of the Libs vote evaporates the Party Machine may realise that there is a "market" that is not buying the one party state poop on a stick product which is being offered.
[[I love the way these tards 'commit' to funding promises when they are neither the government, nor have any chance whatsoever of coming good with the promise]]Climate change
The Australian Greens today committed to do Australia’s fair share in providing climate finance to help developing nations transition to clean energy and adapt to the impacts of global warming.
“In Paris, Australia agreed with other developed nations to collectively provide US$100 billion per year by 2020 in climate finance to assist developing nations transition to clean energy and adapt to the impacts of global warming.
“The Greens would make sure Australia pulls its weight, by mobilizing $3.2 billion per year by 2020 from a combination of public and private finance.
“The Greens would raise Australia’s contribution from $200 million per year to $1.6 billion per year by 2019-20 mainly for grants to support climate adaptation, and would mobilise an equivalent level of private finance,” Senator Waters said.
Supaduke wrote:Well according to most predictions in the late 90's when this hysteria gathered momentum we should all be under water by now. And whatever happened to the ozone layer? And the big hole in it over Antartica? Is that not cool anymore?
Can't help but think it's just to create new industry like the Y2K bug nonsense. And distract the general populace from how crap our politicians are.
"Yes yes" said the politician, " I know I'm crap at my job but hey everybody look up there , it's a giant hole in the sky...."
<<Genesis93>> wrote:I was looking for a current greens 'dangerous is guns them are' policy, and I came across their latest, how do you describe it, load of fanstastically ridiculous non-sense...so pretty much the standard for the greentards.....I just can not imagine how lacking in intelligence those who vote for them must be - if they actually pay attention to what the candidates preach and what they seek....;
http://greensmps.org.au/content/media-r ... n-year-cli
Greens commit to help our hard-hit Pacific island neighbours with $3.6 billion per year in climate finance
media-releases
30 Jun 2016 | Larissa Waters (<verifiable loon, the one who called for action on Barbie doll female toy stereotypes while wearing a tight figure hugging dress and well done up with makeup)[[I love the way these tards 'commit' to funding promises when they are neither the government, nor have any chance whatsoever of coming good with the promise]]Climate change
The Australian Greens today committed to do Australia’s fair share in providing climate finance to help developing nations transition to clean energy and adapt to the impacts of global warming.
.....“In Paris, Australia agreed with other developed nations to collectively provide US$100 billion per year by 2020 in climate finance to assist developing nations transition to clean energy and adapt to the impacts of global warming.
“The Greens would make sure Australia pulls its weight, by mobilizing $3.2 billion per year by 2020 from a combination of public and private finance.
“The Greens would raise Australia’s contribution from $200 million per year to $1.6 billion per year by 2019-20 mainly for grants to support climate adaptation, and would mobilise an equivalent level of private finance,” Senator Waters said.
Yes, all for increase the ridiculous and offensively criminal wasteful give away of our grand children's money (goes on the tab) for an absolutely intangible action and result.....because of global consensus of the 1000 global scientists (of the how many million scientists who probably question at best and disagree at worst with the anthropogenic global warming theories)
While.....those remaining scientists who have retained their sanity - are looking at the actual SUN, that big bright star out side, that is, the actual warming mechanism of the earths surface...... is suspiciously sun-spot free for a particularly extended period this year, indicating the possibility of a very concerning potential precursor to an earth cooling period, AKA a (mini) ICE AGE!!!!
Imagine the horrific irony, should our children find themselves paying off immense interest bill in 30 years time to prevent the theorised/lied about warming of pacific island, while the snowline has descended from the peaks of the Victorian and NSW alpine regions... to somewhere near the once sunny metropolitan beaches....
Just see how the mini ice age question is avoided/rejected/ridiculed by the 'warmers'... they know best.
happyhunter wrote:Stick to pot stirring and veiled propaganda. You don't do science well.