happyhunter wrote:Title_II wrote:I thought these people were over. If you check their US wikipedia page it basically talks about how they won't admit how few members they have and that's about it.
Problem is they have friends in very high places.
Its not that they have friends
necessarily in those places.... but that they represent at best coalescing of agenda while at worst an organised vocal proponent convenient for getting the message out and stirring up the noise.... All part of the
great social cataclysmic movement being imposed upon the people, since ww2, from the UN down and involves such matters as miscegenation, undermining of the moral character of our society, control.
All of these can only be
completed with the utter and complete disarmament of all free people.
As we know, it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with keeping the community safe, preventing death...just look at the 'assault weapon ban movement in the USA, all this to say 10, 20 or 30 people nationally in the USA?? Its all about taking from the people the equivalent (as close at it gets) small arm of the military.
The UN has a whole arm devoted to 'taking away our guns', ie. SALW..... oh, no, its the illicit ones, those in 3rd world countries, not
your hunting rifle..... whatever, dont believe anything they say, especially considering our nation has been the 'author' of many including the most recent gun control (disarmament) measures in the UN.... then they turn around and air drop pallet loads of AK47s along with sufficient ammo to keep ISIS running for months, oh no, that was for the kurds and the 'moderate' rebels....of course it was....ask the kurds how many of the air drops theyve actually received...
FMD nothing was said locally about our air force delivering 'assault rifles' to random people in the Iraq/Syria conflict zone, rebels fighting a legitimate recognised government..... but I'm sure they were all vetted, properly licensed and waited the necessary 28days, hence our GCA had nothing to say about the venture.
As far as GCA tards go, one of their own was brought in front of a senate committee, and under oath, refused to answer the question of how many (or how few) members they had, so why on earth, unless you're doing something wrong, or just through sheer shame, would you not answer the question..... note in Victoria, where the 'club' is incorporated, the law requires 5 members, which I doubt they have - hence the refusal to answer.... Who cares how many members right? Well it does because they are the go - to group for comment each and every time 'guns' are discussed locally and they proclaim to speak for the community
OK. I've said my piece.