POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual owner

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by adam » 12 Apr 2016, 6:43 pm

The greens dream up new ideas to hassle LFO's. LFO's come up with other creative ways to get around greens policies... yet all the while the real criminals are ignored by the Greens free to continue obtaining illegal firearms on the black market as they always have...
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Xerox » 14 Apr 2016, 11:20 am

And we're going to need male and female versions of each silhouette too :lol:
Xerox
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 179
South Australia

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Title_II » 14 Apr 2016, 2:11 pm

There should be a five staffer limit for every politician.
User avatar
Title_II
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1430
United States of America

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Rakk » 18 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm

Give a +/- margin of 5 :lol:
User avatar
Rakk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 156
Australian Capital Territory

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by happyhunter » 18 Apr 2016, 6:49 pm

You need at least 5 guns just to cover the bases. Silly poll.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Title_II » 19 Apr 2016, 10:53 am

happyhunter wrote:You need at least 5 guns just to cover the bases. Silly poll.


Agreed. I fully approve a 5 gun minimum limit.
User avatar
Title_II
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1430
United States of America

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics