POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual owner

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 11 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm

This is just getting beyond ridiculous now.....

Please make the stupid end....


But surprisingly the story is misquoting the source.... davey actually suggested 5 firearms per genuine reason.... NOT 5 gun limit overall .....

So reason1 100m comp
Reason 2 200m comp
Reason 3 300m comp
500m
3p
1p
2p
Hunting rabbits
Foxes
Deer
Victorian deer

So thats 55 firearms so far :thumbsup:
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 11 Apr 2016, 9:51 pm

And.....

Anyone with less than 20 firearms IS NOT pulling their weight :evil: :D
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Wylie27 » 11 Apr 2016, 9:59 pm

I am trying. I went from none to 5.. 6 if you include the wife's

All that in a year!
Wylie27
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 885
New South Wales

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by deye243 » 12 Apr 2016, 1:21 am

Title_II wrote:I'm getting ready to come down there with a few hundred thousand of my friends. You guys were the toughest, most self-sufficient people on the planet. What the heck happened?


the short answer is this is no longer the country i was born in 51 years ago
User avatar
deye243
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2253
Victoria

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Noisydad » 12 Apr 2016, 7:26 am

<<Genesis93>> wrote:And.....

Anyone with less than 20 firearms IS NOT pulling their weight :evil: :D

Fine then! I'll go and pick up another one today!...Happy now?
There's still a few of Wile. E Coyote's ideas that I haven't tried yet.
User avatar
Noisydad
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1383
Victoria

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by happyhunter » 12 Apr 2016, 8:41 am

We handled our lefty infestation a bit less aggressively and now the infestation is going to take more aggressive format then usual.


I thought it was jack boot jonny and his far right government that initiated the buy back and all the crap that came with it. Didn't know jonny was a leftie.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Gwion » 12 Apr 2016, 8:59 am

happyhunter wrote:
We handled our lefty infestation a bit less aggressively and now the infestation is going to take more aggressive format then usual.


I thought it was jack boot jonny and his far right government that initiated the buy back and all the crap that came with it. Didn't know jonny was a leftie.


Yup...
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by pajamatime » 12 Apr 2016, 10:36 am

just a reminder to all lafos. The greens won't win! the antis won't win! we will conquer our enemies and then some more.
The Prudent see the evil and hide but the Naive keep going and are punished for it
pajamatime
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 393
Queensland

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 12 Apr 2016, 11:15 am

deye243 wrote:
Title_II wrote:I'm getting ready to come down there with a few hundred thousand of my friends. You guys were the toughest, most self-sufficient people on the planet. What the heck happened?


the short answer is this is no longer the country i was born in 51 years ago


Back then you didnt need a firearm licence, our society worked on the ancient basis of do no wrong to others etc....

Back then we defined shotguns and air guns specifically NOT as firearms.... and that seemed to work well, and crims had guns, as they did today...

What happened was the second attempted takeover of the free world occurred. it appears the 'wrong' side won, apparently as the leftist, internationalist marxist policies have swept the 'west'.... some of which nations are perhaps as socialist as the USSR at its inception... marxist one people free movement, no borders, no morals destroy the church and family unit HAS destroyed Europe. A group of nations {nation - group of like peoples} that for millennia fought to keep others out and maintain their identity....

All gone now, gates of Vienna....what's that?

The left is winning.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 12 Apr 2016, 11:16 am

pajamatime wrote:just a reminder to all lafos. The greens won't win! the antis won't win! we will conquer our enemies and then some more.


There is only 1 way 'we' will conquer our 'enemy', that will take drastic action, perhaps the ultimate :unknown:
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Lyam » 12 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm

<<Genesis93>> wrote:Please make the stupid end....


But surprisingly the story is misquoting the source.... davey actually suggested 5 firearms per genuine reason.... NOT 5 gun limit overall .....

So reason1 100m comp
Reason 2 200m comp
Reason 3 300m comp
500m
3p
1p
2p
Hunting rabbits
Foxes
Deer
Victorian deer

So thats 55 firearms so far :thumbsup:


Goat hunting, metallic goat silhouette shooting... :lol:
Ruger 77/22 + Bushnell Banner 3.5-10x36
Tikka T3 Forest 270 Win + Swarovski Z3 3-10x42
User avatar
Lyam
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 213
Victoria

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 12 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm

sheep silhouettes
ewe silhouettes
Ram silhouettes
pig silhouettes
swine silhouettes
porcine silhouettes
bovine silhouettes
ovine silhouettes
cervine silhouettes
chicken silhouettes
duck silhouettes
turkey silhouettes
turducken silhouettes (confused animals....so don't discriminate!)

Good for another 65 firearms....
Dave is right :thumbsup:






:sarcasm:
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by adam » 12 Apr 2016, 6:43 pm

The greens dream up new ideas to hassle LFO's. LFO's come up with other creative ways to get around greens policies... yet all the while the real criminals are ignored by the Greens free to continue obtaining illegal firearms on the black market as they always have...
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Xerox » 14 Apr 2016, 11:20 am

And we're going to need male and female versions of each silhouette too :lol:
Xerox
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 179
South Australia

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Title_II » 14 Apr 2016, 2:11 pm

There should be a five staffer limit for every politician.
User avatar
Title_II
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1430
United States of America

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Rakk » 18 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm

Give a +/- margin of 5 :lol:
User avatar
Rakk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 156
Australian Capital Territory

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by happyhunter » 18 Apr 2016, 6:49 pm

You need at least 5 guns just to cover the bases. Silly poll.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: POLL - Should there be a five-gun limit for individual o

Post by Title_II » 19 Apr 2016, 10:53 am

happyhunter wrote:You need at least 5 guns just to cover the bases. Silly poll.


Agreed. I fully approve a 5 gun minimum limit.
User avatar
Title_II
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1430
United States of America

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics