2017 NFA is here - please read

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by brett1868 » 23 Feb 2017, 8:59 am

Ahh and yes I do agree, still a crisis, just not as bad as it could have been...! I'm biased being a competitive pistol shooter who competes in many non Olympic / Commonwealth events.


I'm also a pistol shooter, wether or not competitive is debatable cause some days I can't hit jack.
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by Wylie27 » 23 Feb 2017, 9:04 am

Some days? :lol:
Wylie27
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 885
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 23 Feb 2017, 11:02 am

brett1868 wrote:
Ahh and yes I do agree, still a crisis, just not as bad as it could have been...! I'm biased being a competitive pistol shooter who competes in many non Olympic / Commonwealth events.


I'm also a pistol shooter, wether or not competitive is debatable cause some days I can't hit jack.



;) :D . Well if you have enough Cash I may be able to give you some Coaching ;) :D and it is probably just as well that you have not Hit Jack! :clap: :roll: :D

Can't beat a happy Shooter. 8-) :D .
.
Attachments
AAdKyRE.jpg
AAdKyRE.jpg (17.29 KiB) Viewed 6180 times
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by brett1868 » 23 Feb 2017, 11:47 am

Wylie27 wrote:Some days? :lol:


Got you last comp, balanced out the whipping you gave me the comp before :)
ItsMe is improving each outing and once he gets his own pistol he'll be a real threat to those chickens.... :D
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 23 Feb 2017, 12:22 pm

:? Well I am still not convinced ! ;) for I just looked at the SSAA National Web site and their slant on the matter is just the opposite of what you guys have been spouting! :o :shock:

Will try to put a link up :roll: ......https://ssaa.org.au/news-resources/poli ... nfa-review
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by Wylie27 » 23 Feb 2017, 12:27 pm

brett1868 wrote:
Wylie27 wrote:Some days? :lol:


Got you last comp, balanced out the whipping you gave me the comp before :)
ItsMe is improving each outing and once he gets his own pistol he'll be a real threat to those chickens.... :D

You bought a $3000 Ruger to beat me lol
Wylie27
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 885
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by brett1868 » 23 Feb 2017, 12:30 pm

BluEsky wrote::? Well I am still not convinced ! ;) for I just looked at the SSAA National Web site and their slant on the matter is just the opposite of what you guys have been spouting! :o :shock:

Will try to put a link up :roll: ......https://ssaa.org.au/news-resources/poli ... nfa-review


I think we're outta sync with the versions of the NFA. SSAA highlighted the problem and the edit has been made, it's this new version that myself and 1886 are basing our views on rather then the older now redundant version. The previous version was definitely a disaster for pistol shooters.
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 23 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm

Queenslander!! :clap: Where have they all gone? they were once very vocal on the Forums 8-) :? What will they do now, for I am led to understand that the Historic use of Handguns by Farmers has been thrown out by COAG on the recommendation of WLB, and the basis and info is being questioned? There is a good article on it the Firearms Owners United site! ;) :crazy:

Well do you think they can use them without ammo, say like a Club? :o :shock: oh no that would be illegal ! :roll:

:crazy: :wtf: ..
Attachments
Cop_Cow_300.jpg
Cop_Cow_300.jpg (16.38 KiB) Viewed 6161 times
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by Title_II » 23 Feb 2017, 7:17 pm

Wylie27 wrote:
brett1868 wrote:
Wylie27 wrote:Some days? :lol:


Got you last comp, balanced out the whipping you gave me the comp before :)
ItsMe is improving each outing and once he gets his own pistol he'll be a real threat to those chickens.... :D

You bought a $3000 Ruger to beat me lol


Ruger doesn't make anything worth $3,000 LOL

Are you mates racing?
User avatar
Title_II
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1430
United States of America

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by brett1868 » 23 Feb 2017, 7:47 pm

Ruger doesn't make anything worth $3,000 LOL

Are you mates racing?


Wylie27 and I are mates and shoot together, he's just stirring me the bugger. It's not a Ruger but a improved version of their design made in the U.S of Aye by Volquartsen. They call it the 1911 Style Scorpion but I call it the "Chicken Smasher" :D
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by 1886 » 23 Feb 2017, 10:18 pm

="brett1868………… it's this new version that myself and 1886 are basing our views on rather than the older now redundant version. The previous version was definitely a disaster for pistol shooters.

Mate, I was commenting on the version that indicated 14(c) under para 7, which was totally wrong and as mentioned being a possible simple typo. I now note it has been amended in the latest version to 14(b)(i). Ironic that my Barrister friend said it should be 14(c) :D

="shouta" 1886 the omission of World Championships is not minor. If anything it should include World Championships and other accredited events. By leaving it just as accredited events and not naming the events allows for them to be unaccredited quite easily.

Even though the words “ and other accredited events” would cover other matches I see where you are coming from.

As “World Championships” is incorporated under the longarms provisions, ie Para 13(a) then if this wording was a major issue relating to IPSC in Australia as bigM has also indicated then I am surprised that SSAA has not queried its omission but "and other accredited events" also needs to remain.

="brett1868......................but I'd still like to see a list of accredited events.

No guys the last thing you want. If specific matches are listed then they are the only ones that become gospel and no others can be considered etc and good luck getting States to amend Regs or their Act accordingly.

Accreditation is not by Police. Besides Olympics, Commonwealth Games and World Championships accredited matches, governing bodies such as your local SSAA could accredit other matches.

Given this I still have some concerns as Cat A, B and C long arms under Para 13(a) unlike Para 7 doesn’t have the words “and for other accredited matches” along with Cat C shotguns being restricted to Clay target shooters only, 13 (b)(iii). I have no idea whether SSAA are working on this but probably not :D

HOWEVER, notwithstanding the above it still has to be remembered that the NFA is NOT law only and agreement but one would assume it should be correct :D. All States and Territories are free to ignore what they wish and do, or go even further etc as we all know.
1886
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 126
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 24 Feb 2017, 9:14 am

brett1868 wrote:
Ruger doesn't make anything worth $3,000 LOL

Are you mates racing?


Wylie27 and I are mates and shoot together, he's just stirring me the bugger. It's not a Ruger but a improved version of their design made in the U.S of Aye by Volquartsen. They call it the 1911 Style Scorpion but I call it the "Chicken Smasher" :D


:D How is the arthritis in the typing hand ? LOL :? :D

:D ;) ..
Attachments
q0j7g.jpg
q0j7g.jpg (51.3 KiB) Viewed 6075 times
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 24 Feb 2017, 11:16 am

:roll: Why the BS with the Ammo in the NFA, the continued attempt to place unnecessary hurdles in front of LFO's and just plain add to the costs of Dealers, consequently making the Shooting Sports more expensive for all is just further harassment of LFO's! ;) In NSW They do Not even use the BS records Dealers are required to keep for the BS Ammo Bill fiasco! Can anyone point out any instance in the last Three Years where this failed system has been used for a conviction in any instance , all the Dealers I have spoken too have rarely even had their logs viewed. :huh: :crazy:

:D :roll: .
Attachments
toiletpaper.jpg
toiletpaper.jpg (79.17 KiB) Viewed 6085 times
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 24 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm

Do you mean the possesion limits??
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 24 Feb 2017, 1:41 pm

duncan61 wrote:Do you mean the possesion limits??



Duncan refer to point # 54 on their BS wish list, :crazy: but I think you mob in WA., have had to live with some of this type of BS for some time? :shock:

;) :D ..
Attachments
559071_3940722648734_1937030974_n.jpg
559071_3940722648734_1937030974_n.jpg (62.15 KiB) Viewed 6073 times
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 24 Feb 2017, 2:59 pm

It doesnt specify an amount.I think it is 5000 .22 LR or rimfire and 1000 centre fire you can purchase at a time.If you have more than 10,000 rds you have to put up an explosives sign to warn potential fire fighters that there is a large quantity of ammunition.Your local gun shop may carry over 10000 for .223 and 308 and other common chamberings but I doubt they would even have that quantity in say 270 or 7mm rem.This condition has always been there just now its written down.In reality how can any one know what you have if you reload you could have any amount anywhere.A shot gun club could probably say they are doing a big weekend club day and get what ever they want.I see pallets of target shotshells for sale at my LGS
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 24 Feb 2017, 3:02 pm

I just called my LGS and they said back up your ute and we will fill it up.If you want ammunition you are not licensed for you can get a collectors lic.When I had a dedicated loading shed on the farm I enjoyed having all the different bullets on the shelf from cat shot to 416 Rigby
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by 1886 » 24 Feb 2017, 5:06 pm

duncan61 wrote:It doesnt specify an amount.I think it is 5000 .22 LR or rimfire and 1000 centre fire you can purchase at a time.If you have more than 10,000 rds you have to put up an explosives sign to warn potential fire fighters that there is a large quantity of ammunition.Your local gun shop may carry over 10000 for .223 and 308 and other common chamberings but I doubt they would even have that quantity in say 270 or 7mm rem.This condition has always been there just now its written down.In reality how can any one know what you have if you reload you could have any amount anywhere.A shot gun club could probably say they are doing a big weekend club day and get what ever they want.I see pallets of target shotshells for sale at my LGS

Duncan, that's all news to me as in my 51 years of gun ownership to my knowledge WA has never had any ammo restrictions.

Are you able to quote the relevant section of the Act or Regulations that support what you say.
1886
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 126
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by Gamerancher » 24 Feb 2017, 5:39 pm

Yeah, unless you are travelling in from another state. The crap we had to go through to travel to W.A to shoot our Nationals was a f^^king joke. Especially the question on the INTERSTATE VISITORS PERMIT which asked "Have you ever resided outside of W.A?" I had to resist the urge to write something along the lines of, "you're f**king joking right? Have you even read your own form? I'll give you a clue, it's in the title at the top of the page." The only state in Australia that does not recognize other state licences, "National Firearms Laws" be f**cked. :evil:
Then as part of our "permit" we had to list the amount of ammo we were bringing in, justify that amount, and then promise to take any unused ammo and ALL empty brass, including .22 RF, home with us. And they reckon NSW is the "Nanny State".

Sorry , rant over. Time for a beer. :drinks:
User avatar
Gamerancher
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1596
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by Pythonkeeper » 24 Feb 2017, 8:33 pm

I'm a reptile keeper/breeder, pythons in particular, and the WA guys (reptile keepers)are getting royally screwed with ridiculous laws and and fees also......lets not mention their fishing laws :thumbsdown:

Wouldn't live there if you paid me, sounds hard enough just to visit.....shame, its such a beautiful place...
Pythonkeeper
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 218
Queensland

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 24 Feb 2017, 9:44 pm

Dangerous Goods Safety Guidance Note .Storage of explosives
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 24 Feb 2017, 9:45 pm

I guess my main point is the restrictions on ammunition limits is not going to be a problem to the average jo hunter
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 25 Feb 2017, 8:32 am

duncan61 wrote:Dangerous Goods Safety Guidance Note .Storage of explosives


There are other threads on DG Act/regs, that cover ammo (explosives) and the quants you can store, classes of storage etc

20kg propellant
40,000 rounds
10,000 primers

above which the additional DG licensing and storage requirements kick in...
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 25 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm

:D In What category would LFO'S put the Politicians involved in the NFA / Adler Lever farce? :? :huh:

. :huh: :o .
Attachments
thD11QJQ8V.jpg
thD11QJQ8V.jpg (43.69 KiB) Viewed 4537 times
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by 1886 » 25 Feb 2017, 1:43 pm

<<Genesis93>> wrote:
duncan61 wrote:Dangerous Goods Safety Guidance Note .Storage of explosives

There are other threads on DG Act/regs, that cover ammo (explosives) and the quants you can store, classes of storage etc

20kg propellant
40,000 rounds
10,000 primers

above which the additional DG licensing and storage requirements kick in...

The storage of propellant etc has always been a known given.

But as mentioned there are no current limits on the amount of ammunition WA shooters can purchase under the Firearms Act or Regulations and that is what BluEsky queried as a result of the NFA's ammo limit proposal.

In addition, the WA Dangerous Goods Safety Act specifies the following so I'd be interested to note legislation that says otherwise, although having 40,000 rounds would be a hoot :D;

Term - ammunition means any cartridge or shell for a gun;

Schedule 6
5. Ammunition, ........................
(1) A person may store any quantity of ammunition at any place.

Schedule 7
5. Ammunition, ............................
(1) A person may transport any quantity of ammunition.

Schedule 9
5. Ammunition
(1) A person may use ammunition if authorised under the Firearms Act 1973 to do so.
1886
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 126
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 25 Feb 2017, 2:51 pm

Theyre DG laws in VIC,

Interesting "any quantity" in WA..... you just cant have the guns... :lol:

Note these are storage rules, not purchasing rules.... if you go the your local gun retailer and order 500 rounds of 308win or 223rem.... I'm pretty sure you'd be flagged.... maybe even lesser quantities.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 25 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm

There is no limit on firearms ownership in W.A.Like most things you need 13 golf clubs 13 fishing rods and 13 firearms
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 25 Feb 2017, 3:52 pm

duncan61 wrote:There is no limit on firearms ownership in W.A.Like most things you need 13 golf clubs 13 fishing rods and 13 firearms


No limit Dunc??
OK, so monday, first thing, apply for 39 Permits to acquire, say, 13x 223Rems, 13x 308wins and perhaps 13x 338Lapua Mags.....

Let me know how you go.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by duncan61 » 25 Feb 2017, 7:14 pm

13 different firearms.I have a ,22LR s/shot,,22LR bolt action ,.17 HMR ruger lever.22 hornet bolt .222 ruger bolt.2 x .243 bolt 7mm rem mag I would like a 44 mag or 30/30 lever.416 Rigby safari classic and some milsurp 7.62x54R,303/25 . sporter .310 bsa cadet If I join a club a 6 gun in .22LR double action that makes about 13
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 2017 NFA is here - please read

Post by BluEsky » 27 Feb 2017, 1:57 pm

;) :? .. Adler Lever Actions THIS TIME ! :o :shock: Then ALL OTHERS Next Time.!! :twisted: :wtf: If there is anyone who does not agree they have Not been following the Liberal Party MO. and agenda, :twisted: they are the only ones to have enacted Laws to continuously hinder and vilify LFO's. :crazy: Yet Crime escalates daily! :shock: . :oops: oops! Left the Face Palm blank, so Fill it in Yo'selfs and send them in, first in starts the Thread! :crazy: :D
Attachments
M1892-Winchester-John-Wayne-rifle-160615-3.jpg
M1892-Winchester-John-Wayne-rifle-160615-3.jpg (76.22 KiB) Viewed 4437 times
2.jpg
2.jpg (42.26 KiB) Viewed 4438 times
Last edited by BluEsky on 27 Feb 2017, 2:36 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
BluEsky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales

PreviousNext

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics
cron