bladeracer wrote:
I agree that owners need to be responsible for securing their firearms, but what we have currently goes way over the top in my opinion. With $20K or $30K worth of firearms then a safe is a really sensible idea. But the farmer that has a $100 single-shot .22 is forced to comply with the same law as an enthusiast. As for other people breaking into your property and stealing your property, you're saying they're the victims instead of you that have been violated illegally? Once somebody takes illegal possession of your firearm I reckon they also take the responsibility that goes with it.
I know its a bit overboard in regards to storage of a single cheap .22 and or shotgun, but it doesn't have to be a full on safe, just decent storage.Safes arent as big a deal as they once were, ive seen really good safes for a couple of hundred bucks used.Sure its more than a cheap firearm is worth, but i see it as a small price to pay.The small safe i got for my ammo storage for instance cost me $10.No its not chinese junk, its a proper fireproof safe.
No im not saying they are victims at all! Just we as responsible firearm owners should not be making it easy for them to get a firearm,like it was in the past when people kept them under the bed in cupboard etc. Junky breaks into house looking for easy cash isn't going to go moving/breaking into safes or decent storage but a firearm just sitting there is going to get taken.
When I was younger i thought the storage laws were silly, now i think they actually make sense.