bentaz wrote:Last time this s**t came out I had more guns than they said were in my post code!
Daddybang wrote:That eff wit shoebridge and the greens are at it again!!! Check out the abc news website!!
If someone can post a link that would be great!!!
No1Mk3 wrote:Do these muppets really not understand that crims use such information to target suburbs for cruising?
bentaz wrote:Last time this s**t came out I had more guns than they said were in my post code!
sungazer wrote:I was thinking which is dangerous. The police do not let us use self defense as a reason to own a gun or even use one when confronted with a potential life threatening situation. There reason being that it is the Police's job to provide protection to the community. Well this is fine until the time comes when they are not there to provide the protection. In this case do we have a case to sue the Police for not providing us with protection? when we could have potentially protected ourselves but were not allowed to do so.
sungazer wrote:I was thinking which is dangerous. The police do not let us use self defense as a reason to own a gun or even use one when confronted with a potential life threatening situation. There reason being that it is the Police's job to provide protection to the community. Well this is fine until the time comes when they are not there to provide the protection. In this case do we have a case to sue the Police for not providing us with protection? when we could have potentially protected ourselves but were not allowed to do so.
jmr22 wrote:sungazer wrote:I was thinking which is dangerous. The police do not let us use self defense as a reason to own a gun or even use one when confronted with a potential life threatening situation. There reason being that it is the Police's job to provide protection to the community. Well this is fine until the time comes when they are not there to provide the protection. In this case do we have a case to sue the Police for not providing us with protection? when we could have potentially protected ourselves but were not allowed to do so.
I look at it this way sungazer, If someone comes into MY house to do harm to me or my misses, I'll do what I gotta do and deal with the consequences later. they'll be dead and I get a couple of years and be alive. Sick and tired of being told to roll over for scum. I want one of these do gooden bastards to move into a s**t suburb in Cairns for a while.
dpskipper wrote:God this makes me mad. Just watched the story on ABC news TV.....
Story starts with the anchor saying "gun control advocates call for gun arsenals to be banned in the wake of the Las Vegas shooting" So I assume they also called for Trucks to be banned after the Nice attacks where a truck was used to run over and kill scores of people??? Why prey on an unrelated event in another country with different firearms laws and culture? Because it helps their cause to ban more guns. Throughout the entire story I think they only said the word "collector" (as in firearms collector) 1 or 2 times. Every other time it was "private arsenal" etc etc. Obvious they want the general public to think we're all mad men, and not just simple sports shooters who like fondling old guns...
I also find it no surprise they had on live TV NOT ONE BUT TWO anti-gun muppets to further their cause. The SSAA only got an honourable mention at the end, no interview NOTHING. Their obvious bias against gun owners is amazing. WHY NOT interview an equal number of people from each side of the debate???
We're being force fed bulls**t masked as news!
dpskipper wrote:God this makes me mad. Just watched the story on ABC news TV.....
Story starts with the anchor saying "gun control advocates call for gun arsenals to be banned in the wake of the Las Vegas shooting" So I assume they also called for Trucks to be banned after the Nice attacks where a truck was used to run over and kill scores of people??? Why prey on an unrelated event in another country with different firearms laws and culture? Because it helps their cause to ban more guns. Throughout the entire story I think they only said the word "collector" (as in firearms collector) 1 or 2 times. Every other time it was "private arsenal" etc etc. Obvious they want the general public to think we're all mad men, and not just simple sports shooters who like fondling old guns...
I also find it no surprise they had on live TV NOT ONE BUT TWO anti-gun muppets to further their cause. The SSAA only got an honourable mention at the end, no interview NOTHING. Their obvious bias against gun owners is amazing. WHY NOT interview an equal number of people from each side of the debate???
We're being force fed bulls**t masked as news!
Tripod wrote:Their figures are wrong for Tassie and that is a statement of fact.
brett1868 wrote:Their numbers are off by a country mile, I've got at least 50% more then what they list for my postcode and I can guarantee I've got the biggest civilian registered rifle in NSW if not Aus. apart from Oldblokes oldfella
jmr22 wrote:It won't be a green flog like Sarah Hansen Young at the helm while all these laws get quietly pushed through, it will be lab or lib...again.