Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

Post by BRNO_Bigot » 21 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm

on_one_wheel wrote:People should buy ducks in packets from the supermarket where no birds were killed.



... as God intended ...
--
It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny
day that you realise how often they burst into flames.
User avatar
BRNO_Bigot
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 224
Australian Capital Territory

Re: Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

Post by RoginaJack » 22 Dec 2017, 9:16 am

Pulled the page, vote wasn't going their way?
Boom, Boom! Tikka, Tikka, Boom! Shoot first, video later.
User avatar
RoginaJack
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1410
Queensland

Re: Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

Post by sungazer » 22 Dec 2017, 9:58 am

I shared it to all the VRA members I had email address for wonder if that was the tipping point. Seemed only fair the greenies were sharing it.
sungazer
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1525
Other

Re: Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

Post by on_one_wheel » 22 Dec 2017, 3:41 pm

RoginaJack wrote:Pulled the page, vote wasn't going their way?


It wouldn't be the first tim that's happened ...
Nobody likes a sore looser :lol:
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3561
South Australia

Re: Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

Post by Gwion » 22 Dec 2017, 3:55 pm

Bent Arrow wrote:Hang on. Shouldnt we all be ranting about a link to Facebook that not everyone can access........... Bwah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah

:lol: :lol: :clap: :clap: :drinks:
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Another attempt to shut down duck shooting

Post by Gwion » 22 Dec 2017, 4:03 pm

Daddybang wrote:
Bigjobss wrote:
Sarco wrote:
Bigjobss wrote:"A number of residents living around the lakes are fed up"

Yeh and f@#!k them who cares? They shouldnt have moved there in the first place.


Comments like this are why we duck shooters have a bad name. The sort of citycentric comment that one would expect from the antis.

While I live nearby some of these areas, I fully admit that there are some shooters who do absolutely nothing, if not the opposite for the cause.


If you think that was giving hunters a bad name then you are looking at things too simply.
I am specifically adressing people complaining after the fact, these people do not deserve the time of day and should be dismissed with a simple f@#$k them.

Genuine people with genuine problems deserve discussion, idiots should be treated accordingly, and as per the Carlin quote should not be argued with.

We should all be sick of antis parading hese "poor property owners" that bought property on a hunting wetland, how many bought on the cheap thinking hunting would be banned and the value increase?


Well said!! :thumbsup: I've had a gutfull of tree changers moving out bush and then trying to change the way we live!!! :thumbsdown: :drinks:


Like people moving in near a live music venue and then campaigning to close it...
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics