by Rod_outbak » 22 Mar 2018, 10:01 am
Landcruiser Choices
My 2 Cents...
We've had 4 models of trayback and one wagon over the years, and had some experience with the V8 utes as well (Neighbours / staff)
Nearly every Landcruiser model has a flaw in it.
[It doesnt mean I'd advise against them as a truck, but each model needs certain considerations..]
In years past, we had a 1973 petrol trayback ute (FJ47?), and a 1981 HJ47 diesel ute (2H motor). Neither of these are a model I'd seriously consider towing or touring with, though many people have done so (and continue to do so). I just think the later models offer a lot more capability; especially when it comes to being able to tow a trailer/van.
We currently have a 1995 75 series trayback; roughly 800,000kms on the original engine, and not burning any oil (yet).
The 75 Series utes were pretty bullet-proof, and the 1HZ 6-cylinder diesel(from about 1991 onwards) is a VERY long-life engine. Unfortunately, they are underpowered, and unless you found a turbo'd model, were struggling to even keep themselves at the speed limit; especially on a hill.
Talking to people who dragged crutching trailers around with this model, and it seems that towing heavy trailers will quickly take it's toll on the transmission/drivetrain.
[This likely applies to all models]
The 75 series does have the front and rear wheel-track roughly the same width; it makes for them to be okay in mud/soft dirt, though they are heavier than earlier models.
I have a suspicion the 75 series doesnt have the secondary fuel filter installed from factory (the non-common-rail diesels seems to cope better with crappy fuel with just the one filter, but a secondary is still a cheap insurance option).
The cabin on the 75 series is too small; the 79 series added 100mm in width and length, and it makes all the difference; especially if you fit a pair of bucket seats.
My current ute is a 2005 79 series trayback, with a 1HD-FTE 4.2L (factory) turbodiesel.
In my mind, this engine is the pick of the Landcruiser engines; lots of power, and well matched to the vehicle.
To be honest, this model would be my choice of Cruiser utes, though finding a good one these days is bloody expensive.
HOWEVER; they arent perfect. There is a problem with the fuel injection pump, which seems to appear around 150,000, and progressively gets worse.
Over time; When you let your foot off the throttle, the engine takes longer and longer to return to idle.
[I spent the first 8 months of this problem, where everyone told me it was the throttle delay built into this model. Given I'd driven this vehicle since new, I knew it was more than the freaking throttle delay]
From what I've been advised by 3 different mechanics, the problem IS real, and requires an injector pump rebuild to resolve.
I understand the last of this model Landcruiser just snuck into Toyota funding the rebuild, but anyone outside warranty(like me), are looking at roughly $4500 for the rebuild.
If I was buying one, I'd be checking if this work has been done, and if the vehicle is over 150K (most would be by now), I'd factor this into your buying decision, if it hasnt been done.
I know of 5 of this series who had this problem, out of roughly 10 of them that I know the owners.
[Mine is slowly getting worse, but can likely still do another 25K before I'll bite the bullet.]
Most people who have found this problem, drive them until you cant ignore it any more.
It doesnt seem to damage the engine by leaving it, but it gets progressively more annoying.
The 79 1HD-FTE does have a secondary fuel filter installed from factory, and so doesnt need an additional one.
The 79 series does also have a slight offset between front and rear track, but roughly 2 inches? Not enough to really notice, especially if you arent running the thin standard tyres. A good set of fats, and you barely notice it.
The 79 series runs the R151 gearbox, which is the same as the 100/105 series wagons. Probably slightly too higher gear for first for a ute, but pretty good for on the road.
They seem to have a pretty weak throwout bearing on the clutch from factory, and I've replaced mine, as well as a clutch.
I was told the clutch really didnt need replacing, but we thought we may as well, as they needed to open it up to resolve the throwout bearing (shuddering when starting out).
Another little quirk I discovered:- My ute went into limp-home mode one day, and would keep shutting the motor down when it returned to idle. You could re-start with the key, but bloody annoying.
I couldnt figure out what was happening. I then noticed that my indicators, wipers, and some of my instruments didnt work.
Mechanic found a rock had taken out the reverse switch on the gearbox, and when I had reversed next, it shorted/blew the fuse on that circuit.
The ECU depended on one of the inputs on that circuit, and so kept reverting to limp-home mode.
Until they could obtain a new reverse switch, they taped it all up, and I had no reverse lights for a fortnight, but everything else worked.
However, amazing how something relatively minor upset the crap out of the vehicle. (Joys of technology)
The V8 70 series seems (to me) an example of Toyota not really understanding their customers. I understand the V8 was introduced because they couldnt get the 1HD-FTE to meet euro-emissions (level 4 or 5??), but honestly?
SURELY, more work to tidy the 1HD-FTE up would have been a LOT better option than adding 2 more cylinders, needing to widen the front track even more(Now 4 inches difference), and making the vehicle less field-serviceable, and more emotional??
Most V8 cruiser owners out here (Cent. West QLD) would far prefer to get hold of one of the last turbo 6 diesels, rather than the V8, but they dont really have the option to chase down a low-kms turbo 6 any more, and it's not like they are much cheaper than a second-hand V8!
The early V8 cruiser utes didnt come with a secondary fuel filter(I suspect none of them do but cant be sure), and it is strongly reccomended to install one ASAP by any decent mechanics out here.
Our young station hand had an early V8 ute, and he found the fuel economy was nowhere near as good as advertised, and he experienced the oil consumption issue as well.
One neighbour has a 2014 ute, and is a bit nonplussed about it. He was bitching about the wheel track issues when driving home along a rutted dirt road the other day; he currently runs standard rims, but is now seriously considering changing over to fats.
I'd also agree with the idea of an EGR block & catch can; they seems to be a smart move.
I've read that there are 3 ways around the front/rear wheelbase issues on the V8 ute:
1). Have special rims made up to provide additional offset for the rear wheels- this seems like a very complicated and potentially problematic solution, but it seems this might be deemed acceptible by DOT?
2). Spacers on rear wheels to change the wheelbase - this is NOT sanctioned by DOT, and can lead to a world of hurt if you have a prang with them installed.
3). Apparently, you can get an incredibly expensive (but approved) axle extension done, to widen the rear wheel track.
You mightnt think you'll notice the different wheel track if you are mostly on sealed roads, but you will; especially when towing on roads that get a lot of heavy truck traffic. Bloody vehicle wanders all over the shop!
My 79 series ute has done quite a few long trips towing a tandem trailer, and you barely realise the trailer is there. More than enough grunt to keep at the speed limit, and hills dont seem to be a concern. I've never had the situation where I wished I had the V8.
If I'm REALLY lucky, I'll be able to eke another 10 years out of my ute, before I have to consider upgrading, and at that point, I'll seriously consider simply doing a complete rebuild of it instead.
As I said; my 2 cents.
---------------------
Sharing the extreme love with cats in Outback QLD