Hey Clayton...how are you mate...
My opinion on ring height differs on what the rifle is used for.
Ive a normal to long neck, so i dont have any "low" rings.
When it comes to a rifle to shoot targets &/or fur from a rest with (ie foxes/bunnies/cats from the car/stump/prone etc where you can get a little time to execute the shot), i like a little cheek contact, more so for unifority & a steady sight picture through the scope...but i dont like a "solid cheek weld" these days, as i found a little more consistancy with less cheek pressure--especially good for long head shots on bunnies..
.i call this as bringing your eye to the rifle type shooting...
For a walk about rifle where may need rapid target aquisition...say on a mob of goats going bunta in every direction...i go for higher rings as i find that type of shooting is more like shotgun where you bring the rifle to your eye & shoot both eyes open...on a flurry of goats going every direction you dont have time to get your head down for a "solid cheek weld" with each & every shot & (my experience anyway) is with rings that require this solid cheek weld that ill tend to shoot high on close quarters running goats because not looking through the scope correctly.
Not sure if that makes sense or not...
its easier to demonstrate face to face on a rifle...
Im also not suggesting my way is the right way...but it works for me...there was once a time i liked rings as low as possible, but i guess we evolve our styles of shooting for ourselves.
For your 22, id go lower rings for sure...you haven't got
" you know who" standing over you coaching for a 1000 yd shot (yet...
), so a little cheek contact will be good for you...but my advice is to not choke the rifle with your cheek either...mediums might be the go mate...
By the way, i dropped off my 222 a couple of weeks ago...when i know ill have more time to spare up there ill let you know & can catch up if you like...
The man who knows everything, doesnt really know everything...he's just stopped learning...