Stix wrote:I think i can hear Homer coming up the hall with a link...
on_one_wheel wrote:The Germans landed on the Moon as early as 1942, utilizing their larger exo-atmospheric rocket saucers of the Miethe and Schriever type... so theres no reason the yanks couldn't have done it in 1969
bigrich wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:The Germans landed on the Moon as early as 1942, utilizing their larger exo-atmospheric rocket saucers of the Miethe and Schriever type... so theres no reason the yanks couldn't have done it in 1969
ya ever see the sci-fi movie "iron sky" the nazi's escaped to he moon and regrouped for a invasion
actually if your into sci - fi with a twist it's not a bad move. it was made in 2012 so the special effects are good
on_one_wheel wrote:bigrich wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:The Germans landed on the Moon as early as 1942, utilizing their larger exo-atmospheric rocket saucers of the Miethe and Schriever type... so theres no reason the yanks couldn't have done it in 1969
ya ever see the sci-fi movie "iron sky" the nazi's escaped to he moon and regrouped for a invasion
actually if your into sci - fi with a twist it's not a bad move. it was made in 2012 so the special effects are good
Sounds cool ... It's probably based on a true story.
I was talking to a fella who'd either left his tin foil hat at home or lost it, he was telling me all about the Nazi moon base. It's on the dark side of the moon, but with tis telescope he can see the tops of the missile silos
It's hard to know how to react to those kind of claims, so I just asked him if he'd be taking LSD that night.
TassieTiger wrote:One of the Astronauts that went up, lost his s**t about what was on the dark side of the moon, he said something like - he couldn’t describe it exactly, but they saw weird flashes that appeared to pass through them - and that something changed him...he apparently then lost it after a while.
straightshooter wrote:Sorry but I can't help myself as this person expresses it so beautifully.
@DavidBCollum
I am a "conspiracy theorist". I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don't think so, then you are what is called "an idiot". If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called "a coward".
David B Collum, Betty R. Miller Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University
Regardless of whether they got to the moon or not one thing I find hard to understand is all the resources and money wasted on doing so nassa may have invented a few things that are good for the people but other than that the whole moon thing has done nothing for mankind except giving a small amount of power people boasting rights
I would have thought the money and resources would have been better spent by helping the needy like the homeless ,returned Veterans, hospitals ''the list is too long'' rather than on the moon jobie ''Just my opinion''
Noisydad wrote:I've got this mate right...no really, an ACTUAL mate, who thinks that not only did they go to the moon but that NASA has never stopped going to the moon. They just stopped telling us. Further more he's said to me during the course of many weird and wonderful conversations, (none of of which have required any chemical enhancement because they get weird enough as it is), that he thinks we're already on Mars citing the $40 trillion black hole in the budget as the funding source.
I had a laugh but then later wondered who's to say he's wrong?
Noisydad wrote:A rescue mission theory is on the table now! Completely new idea to me and really no sillier than any other lol
on_one_wheel wrote:Noisydad wrote:I've got this mate right...no really, an ACTUAL mate, who thinks that not only did they go to the moon but that NASA has never stopped going to the moon. They just stopped telling us. Further more he's said to me during the course of many weird and wonderful conversations, (none of of which have required any chemical enhancement because they get weird enough as it is), that he thinks we're already on Mars citing the $40 trillion black hole in the budget as the funding source.
I had a laugh but then later wondered who's to say he's wrong?
I guess if we can learn to live on a planet that's
had most of its carbon dioxide atmosphere blown away by solar winds due to the lack of an intrinsic global magnetic field,
is bombarded so hard by radiation that the very instrument sent there to measure it got fried by it.
Has a night-time temperature of minus 73 degrees Celsius
Where almost all water exists only as ice....
Then its safe to say we'll be able to survive on earth for a while yet. ... 40 trillion well spent
Next time you see ya slightly wacky mate, tell him that Neil Armstrong never went to the moon ... he came from the moon, want proof? what's Neil A spelt backwards ?
The whole lunar landing thing was actually rescue mission to save the stranded alien piolt.
deanp100 wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:Noisydad wrote:I've got this mate right...no really, an ACTUAL mate, who thinks that not only did they go to the moon but that NASA has never stopped going to the moon. They just stopped telling us. Further more he's said to me during the course of many weird and wonderful conversations, (none of of which have required any chemical enhancement because they get weird enough as it is), that he thinks we're already on Mars citing the $40 trillion black hole in the budget as the funding source.
I had a laugh but then later wondered who's to say he's wrong?
I guess if we can learn to live on a planet that's
had most of its carbon dioxide atmosphere blown away by solar winds due to the lack of an intrinsic global magnetic field,
is bombarded so hard by radiation that the very instrument sent there to measure it got fried by it.
Has a night-time temperature of minus 73 degrees Celsius
Where almost all water exists only as ice....
Then its safe to say we'll be able to survive on earth for a while yet. ... 40 trillion well spent
Next time you see ya slightly wacky mate, tell him that Neil Armstrong never went to the moon ... he came from the moon, want proof? what's Neil A spelt backwards ?
The whole lunar landing thing was actually rescue mission to save the stranded alien piolt.
We learnt to live in Ipswich, mars won’t be much of a stretch.
deanp100 wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:Noisydad wrote:I've got this mate right...no really, an ACTUAL mate, who thinks that not only did they go to the moon but that NASA has never stopped going to the moon. They just stopped telling us. Further more he's said to me during the course of many weird and wonderful conversations, (none of of which have required any chemical enhancement because they get weird enough as it is), that he thinks we're already on Mars citing the $40 trillion black hole in the budget as the funding source.
I had a laugh but then later wondered who's to say he's wrong?
I guess if we can learn to live on a planet that's
had most of its carbon dioxide atmosphere blown away by solar winds due to the lack of an intrinsic global magnetic field,
is bombarded so hard by radiation that the very instrument sent there to measure it got fried by it.
Has a night-time temperature of minus 73 degrees Celsius
Where almost all water exists only as ice....
Then its safe to say we'll be able to survive on earth for a while yet. ... 40 trillion well spent
Next time you see ya slightly wacky mate, tell him that Neil Armstrong never went to the moon ... he came from the moon, want proof? what's Neil A spelt backwards ?
The whole lunar landing thing was actually rescue mission to save the stranded alien piolt.
We learnt to live in Ipswich, mars won’t be much of a stretch.