Its shows the strength of character of a number of posters here that they can't admit they are wrong.
I suppose people are lucky that having a firearm licence doesn't involve having to know the law that well and that police don't enforce the fit and proper person requirement that much as many here would lose their licence if they did.
So a summary of posts so far.
on_one_wheel
You claim I am wrong, but when called out on it, you can't back your opinion, but like to use legal words you don't even understand to make it seem to others you may know what your talking about. When called on it you ghost the topic/thread never to be heard of again.
Bladerracer
You post a link to Section 30 of the Domestic Animals Act, 1994 claiming that it applies to sheep, when called on it, that it applies to only dogs and cats you ghost the topic/thread never to be heard of again.
Oldbloke
"I believe it's ok to shoot them on your land. If the owner does not collect them after being notified. I believe its ok to shoot them on SF. If not leased." When pointed out this is incorrect, replies no point arguing and disappears from the thread! Is that because you were wrong and don't want to admit it? happy for you to post the law that allows to to shoot them!
Zaine
Posts about ownership of sheep, when told under the impoundment of livestock act ownership doesn't really matter with how they are trespassing livestock are treated,disappears from the thread!
DaveZ
Just complains that the laws are bad and people should morally be able to shoot them on sight as people shouldn't have to have fences to keep livestock in/out.
I guess a lot of farmers will be happy to know that they don't need fences anymore.
NTSOG
You just don't belong on this thread, how dare you post a rational post.