cz515 wrote:Bob Nutter.
I think I heard the media saying he wants school kids to have firearms. Ohh that's going to go down well with the GCA ppl.
I know someone who will not get a Christmas card from GCA.
I think we need a bit of reset with the firearms laws and some of the ridiculous laws including appearance
womble wrote:cz515 wrote:Bob Nutter.
I think I heard the media saying he wants school kids to have firearms. Ohh that's going to go down well with the GCA ppl.
I know someone who will not get a Christmas card from GCA.
I think we need a bit of reset with the firearms laws and some of the ridiculous laws including appearance
I dont care what GCA think. Because they are idiots.
We should not be so naive as to assume we are invulnerable to a foreign aggressor. Because that’s idiotic.
A country like china will full control over the information it’s citizens receives can invade us with the full strength of its military.
As we are seeing exactly that play out now with russia.
In fact theres no reason for them not to. Because they are nice people ? Not reassuring.
We need to start thinking like Israel, because just like there, our neighbours wont think alike. That’s our future. And we are soft.
Oh but the US will stick up for us. That’s weak. We need to be able to stand our own ground on our own feet.
Are Americans not prepared ? Do they not raise and train their youth to handle firearms if ever necessary ?
Why should they help us when we dont help ourselves ?
We are a rare country to have this attitude of se’ll be right. And naive. Most countries are better prepared.
Your sovereignty means nothing when your aggressor claims it is’nt real. As we are seeing.
Oldbloke wrote:He is still on the job.
http://www.sportingshooter.com.au/lates ... overnments
When you think about it. Its almost like both parties are doing their level best to welcome the Chinese troops.
womble wrote:If you dont give them a reason to be responsible the you reap what you sow.
cz515 wrote:womble wrote:If you dont give them a reason to be responsible the you reap what you sow.
Womble... the reality is that it's only very limited countries that allow their citizens access to firearms.
cz515 wrote:womble wrote:If you dont give them a reason to be responsible the you reap what you sow.
Womble... the reality is that it's only very limited countries that allow their citizens access to firearms.
Robin wrote:Bob Katter the Mad Hatter.
Every kid being armed, haha nooo way.
My son I believe will be responsible, however I have seen some of the kids in his class and I wouldn't give them a Gel blaster, some kids are responsible and there also many who are not, I know under my guide, my son will be a great shot and a responsible gun owner one day, but there are some kids who just can not be trained, just have a drive past Logan Central late at night and its enough to know that if those kids had guns, it would be a interesting story.
I do like the idea of shooting to be a sport in schools, if that was at my school, I would have worked harder, it could also teach them the level of discipline that they need, I'm not too sure on how the selection process would be for this, but I did shooting in Cadets and it was controlled and fun so if they use the same training in schools, then it could be a thing.
cz515 wrote:I t think you are dreaming about China.
But I feel I shouldn't wake you up as you will be cranky
Oldbloke wrote:"Most people today would not even turn the lights out if chinese bombers started doing flyovers."
Mate, they would all be writing letters to their local MPs or on Faceache complaining that their freedom and constitutional rights were being violated.