Die Judicii wrote:Enough is Enough,,,,,,,
When is the majority of the worlds population/countries (regardless of whether being NATO members or not),,,, gonna stand up to Putin and
simply say, F#ck off out of the Ukraine,,,, Get back into your own pigsty,,,,, Mind your own business,,,,,, and stay behind the f#cking boundary fence.
It's pretty obvious that even if the Ukraine house's neo nazis "as Putin claims",,,,, they haven't made any moves against Putin.
I'm sure we all would have heard about it before now if such had happened.
The writing is on the wall as per,,,, Nostradamus,, and God knows how many other prophets,, Political forecasts,, War experts,, Bible, etc etc, that
we are in for WW3 anyway.
Putin has demonstrated throughout this Ukraine "special exercise" just how disorganized, pathetic, and LOW low he can stoop,,,,,,,, regardless of
whether he is fully informed or not.
The rest of the world seems to be pretty well f#cked by politicians, greens, greenhouse gases, and mining companies as things stand,,,,,,,,,,,
So bring it on I say,,,,,,,,, Bring it on.
So OK,,,,,, I may be living in a dream,,,,,, smoking some strange sh!t,,,,,,,,,,,,, whatever,,,,, but why can't the vast majority of the world simply,,,,,
Get rid of this Prick.
It is so frustrating not being able to say so to the bastard face to face.
The rest of the world needs to grow a much bigger set of balls.
No1Mk3 wrote:Absolutely don't agree, in 1962 the West threatened atomic war if USSR put missiles in Cuba, and for years Russia has told former Soviets not to host medium range tacticals on their territory. Zhelensky knew this, but went ahead with plans to do so anyway. Ukraine gets what it asks for. By the way, Donbas is Russian, always was, still is, always will be. Only ended up under Kiev because of Stalin. They speak only Russian in Donbas. F**k Ukraine, until they agree to not host missiles pointed at Russia Putin should hammer them. And Kiev should respect the people of Donbas who 98% voted to leave Ukraine.
Oldbloke wrote:I agree, the bully needs a good punch in the nose. Not keen on a ww3, that would be a disaster, big time.
Russia is clearly bombing non-military targets and their behaviour has been appalling.
I say give Ukrain heaps of heavy artillery, drones and long range missiles even aircraft to hit Russian military targets & cities. Including the Kremlin. Make them pay.
Then one of pootins mates will finish the war with just 1 bullet.
mchughcb wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I agree, the bully needs a good punch in the nose. Not keen on a ww3, that would be a disaster, big time.
Russia is clearly bombing non-military targets and their behaviour has been appalling.
I say give Ukrain heaps of heavy artillery, drones and long range missiles even aircraft to hit Russian military targets & cities. Including the Kremlin. Make them pay.
Then one of pootins mates will finish the war with just 1 bullet.
You off the medication again? You think the Russians won't nuke the Kiev if the Kremlin is attacked by missiles or fighter bombers?
The Americans spent a trillion dollars bombing Afghanistan because a goat herder crashed a plane into the pentagon.
mchughcb wrote:No1Mk3 wrote:Absolutely don't agree, in 1962 the West threatened atomic war if USSR put missiles in Cuba, and for years Russia has told former Soviets not to host medium range tacticals on their territory. Zhelensky knew this, but went ahead with plans to do so anyway. Ukraine gets what it asks for. By the way, Donbas is Russian, always was, still is, always will be. Only ended up under Kiev because of Stalin. They speak only Russian in Donbas. F**k Ukraine, until they agree to not host missiles pointed at Russia Putin should hammer them. And Kiev should respect the people of Donbas who 98% voted to leave Ukraine.
The last guy that handed out rifles to 16 year olds in the street rather than surrender before the country was destroyed was pulled out of his bunker by the Russians. The Donbass and Mariupol had their referendum and was ignored by Kiev. They have sacrificed the city for what. Already 1400 marines surrendered but the rest will fight to death. What is the point? They will either starve, be gassed, bombed or drowned. The Russians won't risk one soldier now. They could have walked out with the other marines. Now they say there are 1000 civilians, families of the soldiers. If you want to end it all, why not let the women and children go for chrissakes
No1Mk3 wrote:Absolutely don't agree, in 1962 the West threatened atomic war if USSR put missiles in Cuba, and for years Russia has told former Soviets not to host medium range tacticals on their territory. Zhelensky knew this, but went ahead with plans to do so anyway. Ukraine gets what it asks for. By the way, Donbas is Russian, always was, still is, always will be. Only ended up under Kiev because of Stalin. They speak only Russian in Donbas. F**k Ukraine, until they agree to not host missiles pointed at Russia Putin should hammer them. And Kiev should respect the people of Donbas who 98% voted to leave Ukraine.
mchughcb wrote:No1Mk3 wrote:Absolutely don't agree, in 1962 the West threatened atomic war if USSR put missiles in Cuba, and for years Russia has told former Soviets not to host medium range tacticals on their territory. Zhelensky knew this, but went ahead with plans to do so anyway. Ukraine gets what it asks for. By the way, Donbas is Russian, always was, still is, always will be. Only ended up under Kiev because of Stalin. They speak only Russian in Donbas. F**k Ukraine, until they agree to not host missiles pointed at Russia Putin should hammer them. And Kiev should respect the people of Donbas who 98% voted to leave Ukraine.
The last guy that handed out rifles to 16 year olds in the street rather than surrender before the country was destroyed was pulled out of his bunker by the Russians. The Donbass and Mariupol had their referendum and was ignored by Kiev. They have sacrificed the city for what. Already 1400 marines surrendered but the rest will fight to death. What is the point? They will either starve, be gassed, bombed or drowned. The Russians won't risk one soldier now. They could have walked out with the other marines. Now they say there are 1000 civilians, families of the soldiers. If you want to end it all, why not let the women and children go for chrissakes
Oldbloke wrote:mchughcb wrote:No1Mk3 wrote:Absolutely don't agree, in 1962 the West threatened atomic war if USSR put missiles in Cuba, and for years Russia has told former Soviets not to host medium range tacticals on their territory. Zhelensky knew this, but went ahead with plans to do so anyway. Ukraine gets what it asks for. By the way, Donbas is Russian, always was, still is, always will be. Only ended up under Kiev because of Stalin. They speak only Russian in Donbas. F**k Ukraine, until they agree to not host missiles pointed at Russia Putin should hammer them. And Kiev should respect the people of Donbas who 98% voted to leave Ukraine.
The last guy that handed out rifles to 16 year olds in the street rather than surrender before the country was destroyed was pulled out of his bunker by the Russians. The Donbass and Mariupol had their referendum and was ignored by Kiev. They have sacrificed the city for what. Already 1400 marines surrendered but the rest will fight to death. What is the point? They will either starve, be gassed, bombed or drowned. The Russians won't risk one soldier now. They could have walked out with the other marines. Now they say there are 1000 civilians, families of the soldiers. If you want to end it all, why not let the women and children go for chrissakes
I see you back on medication.
Everytime there has been an agreed evacuation the Russians have bombed the area killing women and children. Your heroes. Yeh.
mchughcb wrote:Die Judicii wrote: Watch this and you may find it's not as black and white as you think.
https://youtu.be/pKcmNGvaDUs
Oldbloke wrote:Apparently about 90% of Russiana are against the war.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/2 ... in-ukraine
cz515 wrote:Come on both of you.
What I find funny is how we hate on one country when another has been doing exactly the same for the last 20... 70 years. Where were the bleeding hearts when America attacked.
Vietnam
Iraq - no WMD were ever there, and they knew it.
Cuba/Mexico
Japan - we need to drop nuclear bombs to teach them a lesson
Syria - and ISIS funny how Isis never existed before Saddam.
Afghanistan - well the CIA says, it was Osama Bin Laden, but OBL was found in pakistan.... ahh fk it let's kill them anyway
OB and Co will just clap their hands and say America is great
MtnMan wrote:cz515 wrote:Come on both of you.
What I find funny is how we hate on one country when another has been doing exactly the same for the last 20... 70 years. Where were the bleeding hearts when America attacked.
Vietnam
Iraq - no WMD were ever there, and they knew it.
Cuba/Mexico
Japan - we need to drop nuclear bombs to teach them a lesson
Syria - and ISIS funny how Isis never existed before Saddam.
Afghanistan - well the CIA says, it was Osama Bin Laden, but OBL was found in pakistan.... ahh fk it let's kill them anyway
OB and Co will just clap their hands and say America is great
You forgot the Benghazi thing in Libya. You know, when Gaddafi wanted to create an African gold backed currency and trade his oil with it. USA promptly 'democracied' the $hit out of him (murdered).