bigrich wrote:okay fellas , here's another caliber discussion . i'm looking at downsizing my collection and evaluating what is actually useful and effective on the game i hunt . i have a 30-06 that i've used recently and while it has a lot of energy and reach , i find my 6.5x55 t3 to be a very accurate enjoyable to shoot rifle for most of the game i shoot, without the 30-06 recoil. not that i'm recoil sensitive
granted it doesn't have the '06 smack down ,but it's terminated all game i've pointed it at so far with a minimum of fuss . i've been using 140 sst's as a standard hand loaded round, and am looking into 125 partitions with a bit more speed as a better option . main game encountered is pigs from 20-80kg ,maybe 140 sst or 140 partitions might be better just in case that monster razorback turns up , with maybe the occasional shot at a rusa or red deer . i'm hunting south east qld and northern nsw and having the 06's ability of shooting heavier than 165's and heavier probably isn't going to get used. i really don't want to spend the money on a 308 either as dollars are a bit tight atm .
so please give me your opinions and experiences of the swede hand loaded as a all rounder on various game . i think it's ability to move 120's fast in a 243/257bob role or 140's for larger game make it very flexable as a general walk around rifle . opinions please......
No1Mk3 wrote:As a young bloke in NZ I shot goats, Thar and Chamois with the 6.5x55 using 77g SP and 90g SP. I also shot Sambar (we called them Rusa in NZ) and Reds using Norma 156g SP, both factory and handloads. The cartridge is very capable for a wide range of game when using an appropriate bullet, but as bladeracer said Regulations prohibit it from being used on deer in Vic other than Fallow. I think the 140 partition would be good on any porker you see, Cheers.
Oldbloke wrote:Do you reload?
I have two 30.06. One I'm now loading with 130gr SPs and 49gr AR2208. Very mild to shoot. It's an option.
northdude wrote:Thats what i use over here. Great fan of the 6.5 cals. Got 3 x55s a 6.5 06 and a grendel. I use 130 sierras in my t3 to save having to worry about running different loads and zeros. My m96 sporter runs 140sst or interlocks. My full wood m38 runs 140 hot cores for service rifle comps. In the 6.5 06 im running 140 gold dots and 120 gold dots. Grendel is running 85 sierra hp but cant seem to get them anymore so will be looking for something else
bladeracer wrote:The Scandinavians have no issue taking thousands of moose every year with it apparently so it would certainly handle our sambar, but we're not allowed to use it here in Vic as the bullet is .006" too small.
straightshooter wrote:bladeracer wrote:The Scandinavians have no issue taking thousands of moose every year with it apparently so it would certainly handle our sambar, but we're not allowed to use it here in Vic as the bullet is .006" too small.
In Sweden, a thoroughly leftist country, about a 100 000 moose are shot annually.
The minimum requirements are in energy at 100 meters and projectile weight not caliber.
For projectiles 155gn and over minimum energy at 100 meters is about 1500 foot pounds.
For projectiles between 139gn and154gn the minimum energy at 100 meters is about 2000 foot pounds.
As can be seen the rules look like they were designed to allow a 6.5x55 to just make the cut.
For a long time a 9.3x57 was a very popular caliber for moose but has now been overshadowed if not completely replaced by more powerful calibers.
The energy and projectile weight rules seem fairly sensible to me but there will always be grumblers who object any rules whatsoever.
Oldbloke wrote:I reckon a 357 would do the job on elephants, sambar, buff and lion ok.
bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I reckon a 357 would do the job on elephants, sambar, buff and lion ok.
and the 7.62x39.......
Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I reckon a 357 would do the job on elephants, sambar, buff and lion ok.
and the 7.62x39.......
Perfect for rhinos and African buffalo too.
in2anity wrote:Bigrich. There's a famous old shooter under the MRCA that's been range-whoring literally his entire life. There are amazing antique photos of him on the mounds as an 8yr old kid - he lived just around the corner. In his life, he's won all the disciplines, ranging from TR, to SR. He won the SR Queens a couple of times, back when it still formally had the SR component. That's kinda where he got his reputation. Anyways, in short is he's amazingly talented, believe me. I won't name him here, out of respect for his wishes for privacy.
Over the years he's always been a real "experimenter". He's run all kinds of calibers in Service matches, which has generally been limited to 400m and under at Malabar. He loves his two 6.5mm modern guns. He's run a 6.5cm and 6.5x55 many times, and we cannot tell the difference between the two in terms of score - they both literally win the comps, always within a big a field of competitors. Both shoot the same, and that is amazingly well.
I film and spot the vapor trails all the time, and both the 6.5cm and 6.5x55 are amazingly fast and flat. They zip in there more efficiently than the bigger 30cals, and not as random as the little 223 when the wind is fishing about. You can always tell by the lack of horizontal dispersion that they buck the wind better than anything on the mound.
I know the SAAMI spec for the 6.5x55 is only low 50kpsi, but this is based on the old smallring mauser. With good quality brass, you can practically squeeze as much performance out of the 6.5x55 vs the 6.5cm. Buy good brass, anneal, load it up hot and drive'em hard, and you'll hit what you are aiming for mark my words.
The aformentioned old bloke sold all his rifles recently (some of which came to me!! ) except his two 6.5s. And his all time favorite rifle, running handloads, is the honorary 6.5x55mm SAKO (not exactly sure what model?). That thing can f@rkin SHOOT!!
bigrich wrote:oh yeah , i don't doubt the swedes accuracy one bit .my own is stupidly accurate it's the terminal performance on larger pigs and such that i'm looking for opinions on
Shootermick wrote:How much better are they than a 243?
Serious question…I’ve got a 243, but don’t know anyone with a 6.5x55.
Shootermick wrote:How much better are they than a 243?
Serious question…I’ve got a 243, but don’t know anyone with a 6.5x55.
deye243 wrote:As a varmint cartridge the 243 wins as a hunting cartridge the 6.5 × 55 s**** all over the 243 Both will do the dual purpose roll just At different ends
straightshooter wrote:For some reason this discussion triggered a memory of a 70's song by Maria Muldaur "It aint the meat its the motion".
Rather than hair splitting over approximately similar calibers the discussion should be giving greater prominence to projectile selection and availability.
GQshayne wrote:I have shot some big pigs with the .243, using 87gn Interlock projectiles mainly, but 85gn Sierras in the early days.
I cannot imagine the 6.5 ever being limited on pigs with the right load.