Billo wrote:Buckleys
darklazor wrote:Billo wrote:Buckleys
You never know, It could slip through. there’s over 20 thousand signatures already on the petition.
alexjones wrote:If you open up the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019 and read the preamble it states:
"In enacting this Act, the Parliament of Queensland recognises
1 The inherent dignity and worth of all human beings.
2 The equal and inalienable human rights of all human beings.
3 Human rights are essential in a democratic and inclusive
society that respects the rule of law."
Castle doctrine fits that perfectly. You enter someone's property without warrant it must be assumed you are there to cause that person harm and their basic human right is to defend themselves or their property.
Getting a castle doctrine is one thing but we would need to have the safe storage of firearm laws changed so we can stay strapped inside our homes or if I draw an extremely long bow concealed carry in public.
darklazor wrote:Well that’s interesting, Similar legislation to the community Bill 2024. the Weapons and Other Legislation (Firearms Offences) Amendment Bill 2019" was written up but got defeated by the public consultation stage. That could explain why the they made the public consultation time period so sort.
darklazor wrote:Well that’s interesting, Similar legislation to the community Bill 2024. the Weapons and Other Legislation (Firearms Offences) Amendment Bill 2019" was written up but got defeated by the public consultation stage. That could explain why the they made the public consultation time period so sort.
bigrich wrote:for those interested in opposing this bill , grayham from shooters union has a Epetition going . i received a link in a email from SU . i'd put it up here , but i'm a tech chalenged individual now if computers had cams and carby's , or were steam powered i'd be right
when cambell newman brought out "hoon laws" in QLD years ago , it was car club numbers and advocate groups that made pollies and police ministers pull back a bit . they pushed the stereotype of bogan louts in the media . but when organized clubs of professional people , tradesmen , etc objected en masse , it made a difference . i myself went with the vice prez of a club to discuss the laws with elected members for my area .and i think the members were quite taken aback to have people front up to "enlighten " them . i think a united front against politically motivated firearms law changes needs a organized front . as individuals we are not taken seriously , so i would suggest joining shooters union or any other firearm advocate group . and support political party's at election time that support our views. i'm sure this is common sense to all on here, but i dunno . maybe my putting this on here might motivate a few to get membership numbers up with groups that can fight for us that has political clout . cheers
bigrich wrote:for those interested in opposing this bill , grayham from shooters union has a Epetition going . i received a link in a email from SU . i'd put it up here , but i'm a tech chalenged individual now if computers had cams and carby's , or were steam powered i'd be right
when cambell newman brought out "hoon laws" in QLD years ago , it was car club numbers and advocate groups that made pollies and police ministers pull back a bit . they pushed the stereotype of bogan louts in the media . but when organized clubs of professional people , tradesmen , etc objected en masse , it made a difference . i myself went with the vice prez of a club to discuss the laws with elected members for my area .and i think the members were quite taken aback to have people front up to "enlighten " them . i think a united front against politically motivated firearms law changes needs a organized front . as individuals we are not taken seriously , so i would suggest joining shooters union or any other firearm advocate group . and support political party's at election time that support our views. i'm sure this is common sense to all on here, but i dunno . maybe my putting this on here might motivate a few to get membership numbers up with groups that can fight for us that has political clout . cheers
Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote:for those interested in opposing this bill , grayham from shooters union has a Epetition going . i received a link in a email from SU . i'd put it up here , but i'm a tech chalenged individual now if computers had cams and carby's , or were steam powered i'd be right
when cambell newman brought out "hoon laws" in QLD years ago , it was car club numbers and advocate groups that made pollies and police ministers pull back a bit . they pushed the stereotype of bogan louts in the media . but when organized clubs of professional people , tradesmen , etc objected en masse , it made a difference . i myself went with the vice prez of a club to discuss the laws with elected members for my area .and i think the members were quite taken aback to have people front up to "enlighten " them . i think a united front against politically motivated firearms law changes needs a organized front . as individuals we are not taken seriously , so i would suggest joining shooters union or any other firearm advocate group . and support political party's at election time that support our views. i'm sure this is common sense to all on here, but i dunno . maybe my putting this on here might motivate a few to get membership numbers up with groups that can fight for us that has political clout . cheers
Yes, they seem fairly active. Renewed my membership just two weeks ago.
As far as shooters getting organised, I've been waiting for that since hoddle Street.
bigrich wrote: . i'll give the yanks one thing, their very motivated and passionate about voting and their freedom
bladeracer wrote:bigrich wrote: . i'll give the yanks one thing, their very motivated and passionate about voting and their freedom
Yep, even the dead ones vote five or six times each
bigrich wrote: . i'll give the yanks one thing, their very motivated and passionate about voting and their freedom
Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote: . i'll give the yanks one thing, their very motivated and passionate about voting and their freedom
Not correct. It's mostly media beat up.
darklazor wrote:Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote: . i'll give the yanks one thing, their very motivated and passionate about voting and their freedom
Not correct. It's mostly media beat up.
One things for sure the true American patriot’s are passionate about their freedom, and what isn’t a media beat up these days.
Oldbloke wrote:The fact is, only about 45% of Americans bother to vote. I don't think that is "passionate".
darklazor wrote:Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote: . i'll give the yanks one thing, their very motivated and passionate about voting and their freedom
Not correct. It's mostly media beat up.
One things for sure the true American patriot’s are passionate about their freedom, and what isn’t a media beat up these days.
darklazor wrote:Oldbloke wrote:The fact is, only about 45% of Americans bother to vote. I don't think that is "passionate".
Whats not passionate about not voting. it’s one’s constitutional freedom In the U.S. no one is required by law to vote in any local, state, or presidential election. According to the U.S. Constitution, voting is a right. But it is not a compulsory.
-
Oldbloke wrote:I do agree it should not be compulsory.
However, if they were "passionate " I figure at least 70% would get off their fat arses and vote on election day.
Don't make excuses. The majority DGAF. That's a fact.
bigrich wrote:Fellas, you both have valid points. I’m glad that voting is compulsory in Australia. Can you imagine how rampant politicians would run if people didn’t bother to vote cause they didn’t have too . The Americans that do bother to vote are exercising their patriotic rights and values. Those that DGAF are just the typical self centred degenerate potato heads that seem to be multiplying in our modern internet and retail driven western society. JMHO …
darklazor wrote:bigrich wrote:Fellas, you both have valid points. I’m glad that voting is compulsory in Australia. Can you imagine how rampant politicians would run if people didn’t bother to vote cause they didn’t have too . The Americans that do bother to vote are exercising their patriotic rights and values. Those that DGAF are just the typical self centred degenerate potato heads that seem to be multiplying in our modern internet and retail driven western society. JMHO …
Could you imagine how many Ozzie’s wouldn’t vote if they didn’t have to. yes, I see your point and oldbloke’s. There’s always going to be those that are self centred only my life matter’s kind of people out there. But what about my kids and there kids. I want them to be able grow up in a world where if they want to got for a fish or 4wd they can. Its sad what our country and society has come to.
I thought I would add this attachment as it was a real eye opener.
darklazor wrote:
I thought I would add this attachment as it was a real eye opener.