Wapiti wrote:My neighbour bought one as a wild dog rifle because his mates from the gas sites said he needed one to increase his success rate, reckoned he did it because "I'm not going to pretend I'm shooting that far out so I've got a 6.5"
This was in response to me running around everywhere with a 16" barreled 308.
He's shot a wild dog, right through the midships, I saw the video from his thermal scope... it took off and ran away. The hit was clear but the projectile just pencilled...I said to the other neighbour when he asked me "what do ya reckon, he says I need one too" that uses a 243 and 223... "Hey mate if you shot that dog in the chest with your 243/80gn Rem. factories would it have run off?" He said of course not it would have bits of bone on the ground... Yep.
Turned out the PRC was using $95/box 140gn match bullets as that's all that is around.
Looking in my reloading manual, the ballistics look the same as a 120 year old 6.5x55... But het, success is just another PRC away (sarcasm alert)
Wyliecoyote wrote:Identical ballistics of the 6.5/284 with 140 grain bullet at 2950 fps and about the same barrel life. Now that Lapua makes brass it is worth owning one.
But here lies the problem. The Creedmoor can load the long bullets out long in a standard 308 length action. The PRC can't. So we're back to the old 260 Rem argument against the CM of one is better than the other if you single load or use a long action. So if you go long action the PRC then looks very good but the Nosler makes it look pedestrian.
So standard action, hard to go past the CM. Long action the Nosler is king. The PRC is just another sales gimmick for a gap that doesn't exist. This is exactly why the 6.5, 7mm and 300 SAUM cartridges are a distant memory beyond competition shooters using the cases for the 7 SAUM.
Those wondering about the 26 Nosler, think 6.5 Shuler. Water capacity of a 300 Win Mag but in a beltless rebated case. Been around for a very very long time and RWS makes indestructible brass and ammo for it. Not common here but it has been the basis of some very winning cartridges in long range competition as the 6.5 parent, the 7mm Jacko and 300 BooBoo. Like OB said a while back, there is nothing new in cartridge performance except for marketing.
Blr243 wrote:Cleavers has one on special in a sauer. 680 bucks. That’s howa prices But when I researched the calibre I can see that it’s handloads only because factory ammo was insane price. And I didn’t want to cough up for dies brass and pills esp since I already own a couple of 243s. And a 270.
Fester wrote:The std 6.5s do me but I like the 7mmPRC because its near enough to the 300 but less recoil.
The 6.5 will have a shorter barrel life and it's hard to beat the Fagmoor for doing the job well and prob to 1,000yds or so.
Billo wrote:Fester wrote:The std 6.5s do me but I like the 7mmPRC because its near enough to the 300 but less recoil.
The 6.5 will have a shorter barrel life and it's hard to beat the Fagmoor for doing the job well and prob to 1,000yds or so.
The 6.5 PRC will have a lot less recoil then the 7mm PRC which needs the longer action, anyway I thought the market concensus was the 7mm Rem mag was still out performing the 7mm PRC.
Barrel life for regular hunting should see it last a life time.
Wyliecoyote wrote:"post up another Short action cartridge that pushes something at 2900 fps"
Firstly short action is usually spoken of at 2.820" OAL and the 6.5 PRC SAAMI specs say OAL of 2.955". So short action it's not.
But if we use your parameters my 7 SAUM runs 180 ELDMs at over 2950 fps. At 0.796 BC it shoots flatter and hits harder that any 6.5 including that shot out of a Shuler. I could probably seat to 2.800" to meet short action requirement and mag feed but i am way off the lands even though it would be possible. Ugly but possible. My 300 WSM will also fill that parameter with a 208 or 212 ELD. Both the SAUMs and the WSMs came out in true short actioned rifles but because bullet technology has evolved neither are really suited to a short action anymore. So contrary to the hype the maximum potential of any of these short magnums is only possible in a longer magnum bolt faced action. BUT there is now floorplates and AI style magazines to fit short 700 footprint actions for cartridges to 3" OAL. Should have been done years ago.
Billo wrote:Wyliecoyote wrote:
Im pushing 155gr at 2920fps from a 22 inch tube. A 6.5 CM would struggle to crack 2600fps with the same length tube and bullet. Sectional density is 318, post up another Short action cartridge that pushes something at 2900 fps. A creedmoor is 300-350fps slower than a 6.5 PRC with the same barrel length. I can load out to 2.980 with my short action Ruger M77.
Wyliecoyote wrote:So when you say marginal do you mean load or stabilisation?
Wyliecoyote wrote:"post up another Short action cartridge that pushes something at 2900 fps"
Firstly short action is usually spoken of at 2.820" OAL and the 6.5 PRC SAAMI specs say OAL of 2.955". So short action it's not.
But if we use your parameters my 7 SAUM runs 180 ELDMs at over 2950 fps. At 0.796 BC it shoots flatter and hits harder that any 6.5 including that shot out of a Shuler. I could probably seat to 2.800" to meet short action requirement and mag feed but i am way off the lands even though it would be possible. Ugly but possible. My 300 WSM will also fill that parameter with a 208 or 212 ELD. Both the SAUMs and the WSMs came out in true short actioned rifles but because bullet technology has evolved neither are really suited to a short action anymore. So contrary to the hype the maximum potential of any of these short magnums is only possible in a longer magnum bolt faced action. BUT there is now floorplates and AI style magazines to fit short 700 footprint actions for cartridges to 3" OAL. Should have been done years ago.
bigpete wrote:Wyliecoyote wrote:"post up another Short action cartridge that pushes something at 2900 fps"
Firstly short action is usually spoken of at 2.820" OAL and the 6.5 PRC SAAMI specs say OAL of 2.955". So short action it's not.
But if we use your parameters my 7 SAUM runs 180 ELDMs at over 2950 fps. At 0.796 BC it shoots flatter and hits harder that any 6.5 including that shot out of a Shuler. I could probably seat to 2.800" to meet short action requirement and mag feed but i am way off the lands even though it would be possible. Ugly but possible. My 300 WSM will also fill that parameter with a 208 or 212 ELD. Both the SAUMs and the WSMs came out in true short actioned rifles but because bullet technology has evolved neither are really suited to a short action anymore. So contrary to the hype the maximum potential of any of these short magnums is only possible in a longer magnum bolt faced action. BUT there is now floorplates and AI style magazines to fit short 700 footprint actions for cartridges to 3" OAL. Should have been done years ago.
Is a 308 a short action? Because a regular old 308 can drive a 150gn pill at 2900fps.
yoshie wrote:I had a 6.5x284 and loved everything about it except how it ate barrels.