bigpete wrote:Border_Bloke wrote:Back in the 70’s and 80’s every farmer & fox shooter had a .222 rem (or .17 rem. For pro fox shooters)
The .223 was around, although not many bolt actions were available for it (I can’t ever recall anyone I know using a .223 bolt action back then). The most common 223 rifle you’d see was the Ruger mini 14.
Today it’s the opposite with cheap military made ammo & more .223 rifles available.
As others have pointed out, the .222 had a reputation for accuracy and it was the go-to for bench rest shooting back then.
Funny you say that,my old man used a Remington 788 .223 exclusively to pay off his house through fox shooting.
In my area in the 1970's and 1980's, my first recollections of meeting Roo/Fox shooters, BSA rifles were commonplace, and the vast majority I saw were in .222.
From what I recall, they were a preferred option, due to being accurate, basic, reliable, and were common enough to be well understood[Hence straightforward to re-build by a gunsmith].
Another favoured brand/model, was the bog-standard Winchester model 70.
Our first .223 station-rifle was a second-hand Rem 788 my Dad bought back in 1988, and I was profoundly disappointed with it.
Didnt seem to shoot very well with factory ammo, and it seemed a VERY poor cousin to our .243 and .30-30's, as far as effectiveness.
Fast-forward another 15 years, and I had some time to spend messing around with it, as well as giving it a really good clean.
I then worked through installing a better scope, along with some other remedial work, and suddenly, this thing was an absolute cracker to use!
We eventually retired the 788 in 2020, after it was getting too hard to keep operating reliably.
[Likely a different story if we lived in easy distance of a gunsmith..]
But the 788 had shot a LOT of ferals before it was retired, and it lived a hard life.
The Howa 1500 hunter stainless has been a fantastic replacement .223.
Pretty sure one of my neighbours still has a BSA .222 in the gunsafe.