Wapiti wrote:What I found personally, is that recreational shooters don't make dents in the feral populations at all.
I know some will say, BS, ferals shot are ferals gone. Yes true. But it's a drop in the bucket.
With my issues, the casual shooters aren't there when you need them, they are 100's of KM away working jobs in cities to pay for their houses, families, food, kids, life. They come out when they feel like it. That's the ones that are behaving themselves.
Then there is the idiot element... to your face they're god's gift to the farmer and when he's not around they are doing all sorts of mischief.
Sure, people can post up info on numbers of animals killed by hunters, and how it contributes. And it does, with the right people.
The wrong people, shooting up campsites and targets, bombing up mobs and letting animals get away just disperse ferals, educate them to the dangers of the farmer who gets around later and would normally have the opportunity to solve the issue because the animals he sees are used to his movements.
If you don't see the benefit of professional feral control, you haven't seen real determined professional control and shouldn't comment.
People posting up videos of themselves in the act of killing animals in a hail of bullets just do not have the IQ to realise what damage they are doing to the people who do not need to fluff their egos and just get out and take animals for resource. Political types are watching, and formulate ways to stop them at the nearest opportunity.
The virtues of hunters, to me is, the healthy lifestyle and getting out in the bush, the benefit of clean healthy meat to take home for your family, and the contribution you bring to the rural communities you should visit who give you the opportunity.
animalpest wrote:Wapiti wrote:What I found personally, is that recreational shooters don't make dents in the feral populations at all.
I know some will say, BS, ferals shot are ferals gone. Yes true. But it's a drop in the bucket.
With my issues, the casual shooters aren't there when you need them, they are 100's of KM away working jobs in cities to pay for their houses, families, food, kids, life. They come out when they feel like it. That's the ones that are behaving themselves.
Then there is the idiot element... to your face they're god's gift to the farmer and when he's not around they are doing all sorts of mischief.
Sure, people can post up info on numbers of animals killed by hunters, and how it contributes. And it does, with the right people.
The wrong people, shooting up campsites and targets, bombing up mobs and letting animals get away just disperse ferals, educate them to the dangers of the farmer who gets around later and would normally have the opportunity to solve the issue because the animals he sees are used to his movements.
If you don't see the benefit of professional feral control, you haven't seen real determined professional control and shouldn't comment.
People posting up videos of themselves in the act of killing animals in a hail of bullets just do not have the IQ to realise what damage they are doing to the people who do not need to fluff their egos and just get out and take animals for resource. Political types are watching, and formulate ways to stop them at the nearest opportunity.
The virtues of hunters, to me is, the healthy lifestyle and getting out in the bush, the benefit of clean healthy meat to take home for your family, and the contribution you bring to the rural communities you should visit who give you the opportunity.
Shooters often talk about shooting for conservation. One large group push it. The problem is that there are no assessments of effectiveness. Numbers shot can mean nothing, it's whether the damage the animal was doing has been mitigated.
Shooting a few foxes maybe results in no benefit... other than shooting a few foxes.
jezzab wrote:Get in before its gone....
One of a kind
https://www.allguns.com.au/listings/rifle-44-magnum/
Wapiti wrote:Yeah but don't laugh too hard. How popular are folding stocks, magazines that look like they hold 30 rounds pinned to 10, pistol grip stocks on bolt actions, and on even this forum, how many people drop comments on how a lever or button release "looks sh*t" because it doesn't look AR enough.
Local gunshop said the 223 Chimera sells 5 to one, maybe 10 -1, over the synthetic normal shorter shaped stock, even though it has the ergonomics of a shrunken giraffe. The Alcor isn't as popular because they reckon customers say, it hasn't a pistol grip, show me something else.
People can buy whatever they like I reckon, but don't be so surprised then what monstrosities turn up.
Wapiti wrote:That looks like a a DTA SRS.
I reckon that was the look he was going for.
Wapiti wrote:Well that's the classic bullpup look, one that was perfected by DTA, so great job. Is it practical?
I will admit that the rear-end bolt position is something to get used to, but the compactness is amazing.
bladeracer wrote:I think the Chimera is selling because it's a realistic price compared to other options. Whether that reduced price means reduced longevity we'll have to see.
What I love about this guy's .44 Ruger is that he built the chassis himself, as I did for my Ruger Americans.
jezzab wrote:I actually like that (yours), well done. The other one I posted though... doesnt really blow my hair back. Its a bit 'rustic' for me, but each to their own. I mean there is "Tacticool" and there is Bunnings