Australian 2nd Amendment

[Wapiti]

I've seen some pretty common sentiment here on this topic, so I'll try and break the boredom by putting up a video of a bloke who might just give some of you some direction on where to look in politics for a solution.

I won't preach who, or what, but this video is very much listening to and a good insight into where to put your sentiment and votes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU1XRJeJHHw&t=85s

And:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwqiucMP59Y

[No1_49er]

If only we could get some traction with those sentiments.

[No1Mk3]

Got to 2 1/2 minutes in, stopped listening. Not fond of Libertarianisn to begin with but this dudes a nutjob.

[womble]

We’re the only western nation that allows armed machete gangs to roam the streets and our government dose’nt have any answers.

Enough is enough.

[womble]

I don’t do social media other than here.
But when I randomly out of the blue get newscorp posting an article on Martin Bryant as they have today, then what does that tell me.

It means the rich and powerful are worried.

How ironic that it was Paul Papalia that planted the seed in an effort to oppress the population even further.

Thankyou Paul.

[womble]

Got to 2 1/2 minutes in, stopped listening. Not fond of Libertarianisn to begin with but this dudes a nutjob.

Here’s a reconstruction of the original version 1775. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DbghWFMLyiA

[Oldbloke]

Agree with a couple of the points,,,but,,,

Dreaming.jpeg (34.25 KiB) Viewed 359 times

I'm a realist!

[Oldbloke]

Got to 2 1/2 minutes in, stopped listening. Not fond of Libertarianisn to begin with but this dudes a nutjob.

Here’s a reconstruction of the original version 1775. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DbghWFMLyiA

I wonder if Mr Patrick Henry sent his son to fight at the front?

[Wapiti]

Got to 2 1/2 minutes in, stopped listening. Not fond of Libertarianisn to begin with but this dudes a nutjob.

If only people could get past the individual person personal thing.
The basis of the topic is Castle Doctrine, but you have to have an attention span of over 3 minutes obviously.
It's no wonder this stuff is pie-in-the sky, because of people's pettiness. But there's always something to blame someone else for their lot, eh?

And the inane comments, FFS, but from whom it's coming from is typical.
Some people take this stuff seriously, but they don't comment unfortunately. It's there for those with the intellect to appreciate it.

[womble]

Got to 2 1/2 minutes in, stopped listening. Not fond of Libertarianisn to begin with but this dudes a nutjob.

Here’s a reconstruction of the original version 1775. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DbghWFMLyiA

I wonder if Mr Patrick Henry sent his son to fight at the front?

He did indeed.

[Oldbloke]

Got to 2 1/2 minutes in, stopped listening. Not fond of Libertarianisn to begin with but this dudes a nutjob.

Here’s a reconstruction of the original version 1775. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DbghWFMLyiA

I wonder if Mr Patrick Henry sent his son to fight at the front?

He did indeed.

Says a lot.

[womble]

Not really. He had 16 kids.
And people were far more accustomed to their kids dying back in the day.

We do need a charter of human rights . In the constitution. It matters more than anything else. To me anyway.
You must have the right to life. Or you are not a citizen. You are just property.
So we really haven’t moved past convict settlement and subjects of a king.
In everything else we have, yet not this. So who owns us now or are we free men yet.

And the ideal of liberty is hidden deliberately. You will never hear it mentioned in our society. The party will never be mentioned in the media. The leader will never be platformed in the media.
And it’s very deliberate. Because it’s a mindset they’re afraid of. It’s people taking back ownership of their own life.

If you own your life, then a government cannot pass policy on your preservation of it. Not up for debate. Not their concern, not their property. We need that recognition. And that is all.

And if you want further evidence. Australian policy of allowing your attacker the advantage is unique worldwide. We are the odd one out. And worse than that, we claim to be a liberal democracy. Not true. No other liberal democracy in the world denies it’s citizens the right to life.

No I am not saying every other country permits people self defence with firearms, as they do not. However they do recognise whatever force you deem necessary. The victim of a crime does not have to use what the government of the day deems proportionate in his or her circumstances.

And a charter of human rights, that all western nations but ours have, overrules the government of the day anyway. So citizens never have to fear bad policies relating to their own self preservation.

And theres a reason our country uniquely does this. And his name is Martin Bryant. And this is his legacy.

So when your child is raped or murdered remember his name. Because he’s why they never had a chance to defend themselves. And he is why they will join him in prison should they defeat their attackers.

And now you know who owns us.