Die Judicii wrote:Wapiti wrote:May-in-Chyna mate.
Eeeeeech.
Why would you move away from Pulsar, don't you use this quality European brand now for your night-time dog elimination activities?
Unless I'm mistaken.

Nah Mate,, Not moving away from the Pulsar gear. It serves me very well.
I was asking about the Pard on behalf of a friend who is looking around for an
entry level thermal scope. 
Now I have stayed out of commenting so far, but I feel it is time to say something.
I have been in the professional shooting bit for over 50 years. I finally registered our business in 1995

. Since then moved into "N V" in general then have basically settled on only thermal.
For the last 14 years or so then into the business side of sales. So, have learned a bit in that time, both how it all works and other details. In this time we have done many "workshops" on night vision. In which after a presentation we show people every thing on all types of equipment from consumer up to Mil spec gear.
The first comment on the basics is "wow that is great", but when we get to the top end the comment is "xqu#" .
Now I have commented on this subject before and had many disagreements with my views. No problems there whatever ones ideas are OK, but my main worry is that regardless of cost, the main problem with entry level for say, $2000, when you think that is all you need, great, BUT be aware that when you see you need better, that money is gone and makes the better gear that much more because you have already spent the money.
We do NOT just see a hot basic image of say a fox at 300 m, we see a detailed image of it.
High magnification is not reallt required. All of our scopes are 3 X optical.
No you
probably do not need the top end like us for our work, but entry level is NOT the way to go.