Point223 wrote:SSAA Gold Membership available now!
brett1868 wrote:Already paid my $25 cause that's outstanding value, pity I couldn't pay another $75 to get $100k coverage.
chacka wrote:Bargain price if your shooters aren't covered in your home contents insurance.
Westy wrote:They'll tell you it's to do with the CPI
RoginaJack wrote:Just check with the insurance company 'cause under a lot of policies, firearms are NOT covered unless they are separately listed and subject to the usual 27 conditions.
Bourt wrote:Which is such BS. They're just another possession the same as your toaster or TV.
And in fact, unlike your TV they're stored in a safe making them 100x harder to steal!
Premium should go down for how much of the sum you're insured for is secured firearms.
Bourt wrote:RoginaJack wrote:Just check with the insurance company 'cause under a lot of policies, firearms are NOT covered unless they are separately listed and subject to the usual 27 conditions.
Which is such BS. They're just another possession the same as your toaster or TV.
And in fact, unlike your TV they're stored in a safe making them 100x harder to steal!
Premium should go down for how much of the sum you're insured for is secured firearms.
RoginaJack wrote:Honestly, words fail me!
If you think for 1 second that "weapons" are classified as "just another possession the same as your toaster or TV." by ANY insurance company, and don't have to be listed then go right ahead.
I presume that you checked and confirmed this with your insurance company beforehand?
RoginaJack wrote:HHmm, just doesn't read that way to me.
handofcod wrote:$25 pa with $100 excess on a claim. Can't go wrong really, can you?
RoginaJack wrote:Honestly, words fail me!
If you think for 1 second that "weapons" are classified as "just another possession the same as your toaster or TV." by ANY insurance company, and don't have to be listed then go right ahead.
I presume that you checked and confirmed this with your insurance company beforehand?
Bourt wrote:Wasn't having a go at you, was talking about insurance company policies being BS.
RoginaJack wrote:Fair enough, sorry.
RoginaJack wrote:I think that $300 per claim is just too excessive to start with.
Point223 wrote:It's a no brainer