Rod_outbak wrote:I use a cheap old 'OPTEX' branded photographic tripod, with a large rag wrapped around the Plate on top of the tripod. I think it cost me around $80 in about 1996, and was considered a bottom-end still-camera tripod at the time. Fully extended, it probably reaches to about 1.6 metres high?? Once I have it adjusted to the right height for the rifle I'm using, it's a few seconds to plonk the tripod down, and rest the rifle on top. I walk and pokk grasshoppers most mornings and evenings, and this ratty old tripod has done a great job.
I have 2 other Manfrotto tripods, but they are much heavier(designed for video), and arent as easy to use.
I've eyed off the professional shooting ones, but I havent yet found the money they cost offers anything better than the old Optex..
I probably add 150 metres extra distance to my shooting by carrying the tripod around with me.
bigfellascott wrote:I made one a few years back now using a camera tripod and mount I made to suit the rifle and the issue I had with it was me not being able to stabilize myself enough which resulted in the rifle moving around too much to be any good. I found the bipod to be better as I could load it up and brace myself up against a tree in the sitting position or lay down prone if I have the right height bipod on.
scoot wrote:So I'm contemplating getting a tripod set-up for when I'm on foot or setting up in good hunting possy's. I've started looking around and you can spend between $100 and $3000+ for a set-up.
Using leofoto as an example there are 3x models that are similar yet worlds apart in price. Lm364c, ln364c, ls364c. All 36mm carbon fibre 4 stage legs. Roughly same heights and weights. Tops are slightly different. Price over doubles between cheapest to dearest.
So who's in the know as to what is best. Ball head or levelling base. Bowl top or stud. What legs, feet, height, etc. I'm happy to spend money if it makes the experience better, just not sure what I should be putting "value" on.
Blr243 wrote:The reason I not gone down this road is because it predominantly supports the front stable and that rear support is up to me nervous arthritic wandering blood pumping shaking useless self ......so I prefer rifle mounted bipod as my body and arms laying prone form a very stable rear base in direct contact with Mother Earth at least two feet rearward of the front support point .....this enables excellent shot placement in the field .....but I do tend to shoot open cultivation paddock s where grass height Is no issue to a prone shooter
scoot wrote:I like the Trigger stick design. This is probably one of the better portable shooting "rest" solutions I've seen. Going to the carbon fibre tripod gives up almost nothing in weight but I think should provide a more stable platform since it removes human interference once locked up.
Using thermal let's me set-up and shoot from positions in the dark that are conventionally not practical. Seems tonnes of Yankee hunters and now more Aussies using tripods? Must be something in it.
scoot wrote:I like the Trigger stick design. This is probably one of the better portable shooting "rest" solutions I've seen. Going to the carbon fibre tripod gives up almost nothing in weight but I think should provide a more stable platform since it removes human interference once locked up.
Using thermal let's me set-up and shoot from positions in the dark that are conventionally not practical. Seems tonnes of Yankee hunters and now more Aussies using tripods? Must be something in it.
scoot wrote:Yea I'm thinking more a system that attaches via arca or picatinny mounts to a more central location. Most of what I'm looking at are designed with adjustments of varying design to pan around and then lock up solid once on target. Able to completely "hold" the rifle. Will give me a much more stable platform when "prone" is not an option.
scoot wrote:That's the theory. Have the arca plates or even pic rails mounted under whatever rifles I want to use. Qd attachment point on the tripod. Just not sure on what "specs" and heads make for a good smooth stable platform. Most of the ones I am iresearched the main variable is the interface between tripod and rifle. Ballheads, levelling bases, stud mounts, bowl mounts. If I can narrow down the better or more popular choice it will help narrow the search.
scoot wrote:So, I've ordered the trigger stick blade referenced before. For the price I think I can't go too wrong.
Next time I hit the big smoke I might try to check out some carbon fibre tripods and ball heads. Hopefully I get a salesman who knows what there on about. either way I'll be more comfortable dropping $$$ on something I can touch.
scoot wrote::friends: Cheers for the effort.
If I'm brutally honest with myself this will probably suit just fine 90% of the times I will use it. I generally run with makeshift rests if I go afield but I think this will really help in a couple of spots.