zook60 wrote:260 rem and 308 are the only calls so far
wayward wrote:The .308 seems to be the choice for these kinds of rifles.
I wonder what inspired them to go with the .260 Rem.
Chronos wrote:A .233 would sell but I can't see the advantage. It's not like you need a 10 round mag for foxes
Westy wrote:UMMHHHH because it shoots a whole lot better than the 308. I'm wondering why everything has to be in 308 being it's such a antiquated calibre
squirrelhunter wrote:Chronos wrote:A .233 would sell but I can't see the advantage. It's not like you need a 10 round mag for foxes
Don't forget Ruger have recently announced their Scout in .223.
If Ruger can't sell a Scout rifle, no one can. See how their one goes and you'll know.
squirrelhunter wrote:Don't forget Ruger have recently announced their Scout in .223.
If Ruger can't sell a Scout rifle, no one can. See how their one goes and you'll know.
Westy wrote:sure as s**t beats using something from before Grandad was born??? ( 1904)
Gregg wrote:Hmm, depends on what you want.
The oldies are fun in their own way.
zook60 wrote:I ordered one in 260rem yesterday.
Atter wrote:zook60 wrote:I ordered one in 260rem yesterday.
Gwion wrote:Available in LEFTY???
zook60 wrote:Gwion wrote:Available in LEFTY???
Nope but a stainless model is on its way.
Westy wrote:Heres a shot of my 260 being used by a mate/son a few weeks ago just outside Warwick QLD shooting their first deer>>>>>
Westy wrote:funny how people like shooting them but hate cleaning them isn't it LOL