30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Reloading equipment, methods, load data, powder and projectile information.

30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by jpsauer88 » 15 Aug 2026, 1:31 pm

Hello,

Me again with more results - for those looking to get estimates and itch that scratch, we know every gun is different bla bla but just for those interested with aussie powders :)
YOUR LOAD Is YOUR RESPONSIBILTY - follow all safe procedures, work up slowly etc. This is purely for entertainment.

30-06 CZ550 Ebony (Bought before this country went downhill)
Starline Brass
Winchester Primer
110 TTSX - loaded 3.250" COAL
AR2206H (known as H4895 in states)

56 - 3350
56.5 - 3367
57 - 3402
57.5 - 3441, 3441, 3444
58 - 3484, 3502, 3491
58.5 - 3518, 3502, 3501, 3505 - clover leaf - best group of both powders.

AR2208 (Known as Varget in states)
60.5 - 3447, 3450, 3447, 3446
60 - 3451, 3446, 3473, 3447
Both very accurate.
jpsauer88
Private
Private
 
Posts: 96
New South Wales

Re: 30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by Maxjon » 15 Aug 2026, 7:03 pm

I have a book with an article by Layne Simpson. He states the Sierra 110gn JHP turns the 06 into a Varmint rifle....Extremely accurate too...
Maxjon
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 200
Victoria

Re: 30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by Fester » 15 Aug 2026, 9:07 pm

Fast, alright, just seems odd to go so light with an 06 that is usually used to hit bigger critters harder.
I don't even go that light with my 6.5s, more 6mm territory.

How are you blokes finding the 30-06 hand-loading accuracy?
Is it 1/2 MOA capable, or 3/4 more like it?
Fester
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 543
New South Wales

Re: 30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by jpsauer88 » 16 Aug 2026, 11:05 am

Fester wrote:Fast, alright, just seems odd to go so light with an 06 that is usually used to hit bigger critters harder.
I don't even go that light with my 6.5s, more 6mm territory.

How are you blokes finding the 30-06 hand-loading accuracy?
Is it 1/2 MOA capable, or 3/4 more like it?


Accuracy is dependent on load + rifle. I have had 1/2 MOA with a 130 TTSX load towards top with AR2208 at about slightly over 3200fps.

Well with light - the thing is bullet construction - going a mono - you dont need that much weight behind it because you do not loose weight. So wiht a cup core 110 you would loose most of its weight and then get inadequate penetration. A 110 TTSX believe it or not, you get pass throughs. So it comes down to BC - under 300m - the most ideal combo for 3006 is actually a 130 TTSX doing 3250fps - 0.35BC - nothing performs as good in under 300m and the 130 in mono has the penetration of a 165 cup core.

even with 80% retention on a cup core - a 165 quickly becomes a 130grain after the first 2 inches of impact.
jpsauer88
Private
Private
 
Posts: 96
New South Wales

Re: 30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by Fester » 16 Aug 2026, 11:52 am

Yeah, even with cup and cores, light for cal, and fast can be the ticket, it seems.

Mono pills are a new ball game, and I have not even played.
I would have to start over with loads, and exy to do all the load development.

Projectiles are not projectiles, it seems. They can all be different.
I have seen the difference that the controlled expansion from a Woodleigh pill has over conventional cup and cores.
Several different brands used to stay in the animal, but the Woodleighs exit with about a thumb-sized hole.
Also had less deer running dead, so that expending all the energy in the animal is not what I am seeing.
They are loaded warmer to get them shooting better, so not everything is a controlled experiment.

I don't get enough animals willing to participate, but I used a Speer Hotcor at the higher charge, and it was like using a bigger rifle on a yearling meaty at around 100yds. The projectiles are a very similar shape, and maybe I just have them working better at higher velocity.
Fester
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 543
New South Wales

Re: 30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by jpsauer88 » 30 Aug 2026, 3:18 pm

You can crucify me for this statement - but I switched to copper due to finding out about a patient my doctor was seeing who had extremely high levels of lead in his body...he was a hunter. There is a wealth of information from the states about cancer rates higher amongst hunters (I know people argue left wing bla bla) but its not like it'll stop people hunting etc. I just make "healthier" choices. When the bullet weight is reduced by 30% even, that 30% is fragmented some is fine as dust which can be consumed - at times 6" away from wound channel.

Its just my reason for going copper - I have young kids. Some people dont believe lead is bad... I err of side of caution doesn't ruin my life shooting monos!
jpsauer88
Private
Private
 
Posts: 96
New South Wales

Re: 30-06 110 TSX Velocity Results

Post by bladeracer » 30 Aug 2026, 3:25 pm

jpsauer88 wrote:You can crucify me for this statement - but I switched to copper due to finding out about a patient my doctor was seeing who had extremely high levels of lead in his body...he was a hunter. There is a wealth of information from the states about cancer rates higher amongst hunters (I know people argue left wing bla bla) but its not like it'll stop people hunting etc. I just make "healthier" choices. When the bullet weight is reduced by 30% even, that 30% is fragmented some is fine as dust which can be consumed - at times 6" away from wound channel.

Its just my reason for going copper - I have young kids. Some people dont believe lead is bad... I err of side of caution doesn't ruin my life shooting monos!


My lead was between 25 and 28 every month this year, until June when it was down to 20. I have another test to do next week and I'm hoping it's still falling.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13989
Victoria


Back to top
 
Return to Reloading ammunition