Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Questions about New South Wales gun and ammunition laws. NSW Firearms Act 1996.

Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by kritch » 27 Feb 2015, 8:55 am

Just an interesting point highlighting some of the crap we have in our gun laws, mentioned to me by a fellow shooter.

Pre-1900 firearms - actual firearms - with no available ammunition... No registration or storage requirements.

An imitation firearm - not a working "replica", just a toy - illegal. More than that treated as a 'working' firearm if used in a crime AFAIK.

Both harmless, but the toy is treated more strictly than an actual firearm.

:thumbsdown:
User avatar
kritch
Private
Private
 
Posts: 71
New South Wales

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by Noisydad » 27 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm

It's the same stupid thing for a mint, usable flintlock built in 1820 (no reg or storage requirements) and an exact working replica of the same rifle built today (register and lock it up).
There's still a few of Wile. E Coyote's ideas that I haven't tried yet.
User avatar
Noisydad
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1395
Victoria

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by Hinky » 02 Mar 2015, 1:19 pm

You're making sense.

Getting our legislations to listen and act is a whole different story though.
Mosin Nagant M1891
Sako Finnbear L61R 25-06
Browning T-Bolt .22LR Sporter
Browning BL22
User avatar
Hinky
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
South Australia

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by Mich » 02 Mar 2015, 1:33 pm

Noisydad wrote:It's the same stupid thing for a mint, usable flintlock built in 1820 (no reg or storage requirements) and an exact working replica of the same rifle built today (register and lock it up).


That's just ridiculous :thumbsdown:
User avatar
Mich
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 182
United States of America

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by headspace » 02 Mar 2015, 4:54 pm

We do have some pretty weird thinkers putting the laws together. I wonder what happened to the broad shouldered, sun bronzed Aussie of old? Covered in 30plus and quivering at the sight of anything remotely resembling a firearm.
If it's not wood and blued steel, it's not one of mine
headspace
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 738
New South Wales

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by nords » 02 Mar 2015, 6:03 pm

headspace wrote:We do have some pretty weird thinkers putting the laws together.


I think you're using that word wrong.... :lol:
Norica Spider GRS Camo .22
Browning BLR Lightweight 81 .243
Browning A-Bolt Medallion 300 Win Mag. Weaver V-Series 3-15 x 42.
User avatar
nords
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 191
Western Australia

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by Davies » 02 Mar 2015, 6:03 pm

I dunno why you're laughing... WA have the most crappy laws of all :lol:
User avatar
Davies
Private
Private
 
Posts: 77
Queensland

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by Vati » 06 Mar 2015, 10:57 am

kritch wrote:Pre-1900 firearms - actual firearms - with no available ammunition... No registration or storage requirements.

An imitation firearm - not a working "replica", just a toy - illegal. More than that treated as a 'working' firearm if used in a crime AFAIK.

Both harmless, but the toy is treated more strictly than an actual firearm.


Using one in a hold up, I reckon there is some merit to punishment for that. The guy on the pointy end isn't going to feel any less scared for it being fake. Either way no sympathy for the bastard robber here.....

As a collectable for us LAFO though it's stupid.

Needs to be more context, not blank laws on these things.
Reach out and touch...
User avatar
Vati
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 426
New South Wales

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by nords » 06 Mar 2015, 10:57 am

Davies wrote:I dunno why you're laughing... WA have the most crappy laws of all :lol:


This is true :(
Norica Spider GRS Camo .22
Browning BLR Lightweight 81 .243
Browning A-Bolt Medallion 300 Win Mag. Weaver V-Series 3-15 x 42.
User avatar
nords
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 191
Western Australia

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by kurl » 11 Mar 2015, 1:13 pm

The pre-1900 deal suits me.

I'd love a pistol from back then and to not have all the licensing drama around it :D
User avatar
kurl
Private
Private
 
Posts: 70
Victoria

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by anthillinside » 14 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm

kurl wrote:The pre-1900 deal suits me.

I'd love a pistol from back then and to not have all the licensing drama around it :D

You can.. Black Powder .. if your game enough ;)
There's always room for at least one more gun in my safe.
There's always room for one more safe in my house.
User avatar
anthillinside
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 375
Victoria

Re: Pre-1900 firearms vs imitation laws

Post by kurl » 15 Mar 2015, 7:47 pm

Just going to be a collectable for me.

Not trying to fire the thing. Or blow myself up :mrgreen: :lol:
User avatar
kurl
Private
Private
 
Posts: 70
Victoria


Back to top
 
Return to New South Wales gun laws