brett1868 wrote:The government should focus more on the Philippine's selling themselves out to China / Russia and booting our allies out. China has it's eyes firmly on Australia's natural resources and will use the South China sea bases and now the Philippines to stage their assault. We'll be cut off from our allies and at the mercy of the hoards, maybe then the assclowns in government might think...hmmm, maybe we shouldn't have banned the Adler... when urging citizens to defend our country.
doc wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:So we can add "one of the world's most lethal shotguns" to the growing list of Adler adjectives.
LOL - starting a list of what the media have used for this would be an interesting excersise!
happyhunter wrote:
Now it's fully political, all commonsense has been removed and unlikely to end well.
Oldbloke wrote:
THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE.
wade06 wrote:http://www.iceng.com.au/2016/04/27/adler-a110-magazine-extensions/
I see that some gunsmiths in Australia are legally extending the lever action magazine to allow up to 10 shots.
You can't import but you can modify. Are there states where it is illegal to own these modified lever actions? Again I don't think that a 7 shot Adler should be the first gun law to get changed.
Oldbloke wrote:happyhunter wrote:Oldbloke wrote:.............THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR THEM.
THEY DONT. THEY WOULD BE SACKED IN THE REAL WORLD.
wade06 wrote:I don't know why Senator David Leyonhjelm is making such a big thing about legalising the 7 shot Adler?![]()
<<Genesis93>> wrote:Oldbloke wrote:happyhunter wrote:Oldbloke wrote:.............THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR THEM.
THEY DONT. THEY WOULD BE SACKED IN THE REAL WORLD.
Actually, I dont think that is strictly correct..
The system was design as far as I'm concerned, as a means to convey the will of the people to the Parliament, and hence forth for the representative to VOTE in accordance with the WILL of his/her constituents.
There should ideally be little if anything that these individuals need to decide for themselves when voting....problem is the will is rarely conveyed to the representatives, other than a general 'feeling' of the community, or the extremely toxic vocal minority that is invariably and conveniently confused for the sentiment of the community as a whole, example, free the refugees and same-same marriage.
The party (policy) vote is treasonous to the people, as is the conscience vote crap... they should be voting per the will of the people,
Example, if Member of Parliament Bugalugs, had the majority of his electorate turn up to his office on Monday morning and stated that their 'will' was such that they wanted income tax to be fixed at a flat 10%....
Then its his DUTY to stand in Parliament and demand the same.
This concept would appear absolutely ALIEN to most of the brain-dead conditioned pop-cultured face-booking diversified de-gendered miscegenated masses......(thanks to the post ww2 cultural revolution that is progressively destroying our society... more and more... day by day)
and THAT's exactly how they prefer the game.
The argument of taking a policy to an election doesnt either hold water as political parties are 'given' control of the vote in parliament "Government" frequently with LESS than the vote of the majority of Australians, current Lib/Nat Gov received 42% of the vote, the Gillard government barely more than a third of the vote.
Oligarchy....that exactly fits our example of 'government'.
happyhunter wrote:I think it was more labor appearing to take the moral high ground and try and make the government appear "soft on guns". Other wise it was all orchestrated by the NFA honchos to tune the general public to support more restrictive gun laws.
Really, does the difference between 5 and 7 shot capacity really matter in terms of perceived public safety?
Oldbloke wrote:For those interested Senater David Leyonhjelm is on. ABCs 24 Late Line tonight at 9.30