Gun laws not negotiable.

Questions about Victorian gun and ammunition laws. Victorian Firearms Act 1996.

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by brett1868 » 19 Oct 2016, 11:56 am

The government should focus more on the Philippine's selling themselves out to China / Russia and booting our allies out. China has it's eyes firmly on Australia's natural resources and will use the South China sea bases and now the Philippines to stage their assault. We'll be cut off from our allies and at the mercy of the hoards, maybe then the assclowns in government might think...hmmm, maybe we shouldn't have banned the Adler... when urging citizens to defend our country.
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3018
New South Wales

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 19 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm

brett1868 wrote:The government should focus more on the Philippine's selling themselves out to China / Russia and booting our allies out. China has it's eyes firmly on Australia's natural resources and will use the South China sea bases and now the Philippines to stage their assault. We'll be cut off from our allies and at the mercy of the hoards, maybe then the assclowns in government might think...hmmm, maybe we shouldn't have banned the Adler... when urging citizens to defend our country.


and one day the Chinese might even sail one of their battleships around the Northern tip of Australia.... oh wait that happened a couple of years back with barely a mention in the media...

Between Russia and the USSA, give me the Ruskies any day, their giving their citizen gun rights while Washington is trying to take away...plus they have more nukes.... less national debt....and more polar bears :D

Putin was at an arms factory recently, talking about increasing the consumer end of the production (thats more guns for the peeps!) I know however Brett, that you could travel further east than Donetsk....
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by on_one_wheel » 19 Oct 2016, 2:46 pm

doc wrote:
on_one_wheel wrote:So we can add "one of the world's most lethal shotguns" to the growing list of Adler adjectives. :lol:


LOL - starting a list of what the media have used for this would be an interesting excersise!

Here's some that come to mind

Game changing
New technology
High powered
High capacity
Rapid fire
Loop hole jumping
Legislation side stepping
Worlds most lethal
And heres the contradiction of terms .... lever action shotgun
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3958
South Australia

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by happyhunter » 19 Oct 2016, 4:20 pm

Caught some of question time today on the ABC 24 rinse cycle and it was all about the Adler. The debate just went circular, nobody said anything useful, nothing worthwhile was achieved and the clowns all made a another days pay at the public's expense.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Oldbloke » 19 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm

The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: Now I'm a member. :unknown:
Hunt safe. A bit more bang is better.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13399
Victoria

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by happyhunter » 19 Oct 2016, 7:28 pm



Now it's fully political, all commonsense has been removed and unlikely to end well.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Oldbloke » 19 Oct 2016, 7:39 pm

happyhunter wrote:


Now it's fully political, all commonsense has been removed and unlikely to end well.


I agree, all common sense and truth have flown out the window. Looks like a debarcle to me.

THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR THEM.

THEY DONT. THEY WOULD BE SACKED IN THE REAL WORLD.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: Now I'm a member. :unknown:
Hunt safe. A bit more bang is better.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13399
Victoria

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 19 Oct 2016, 7:45 pm

Well.... the most interesting and revealing point of this whole fiasco, was when Turdfull stated that the the import ban was until the RECATEGORISATION was agreed to, we have been fed the line however, up until this point, that the import restriction was to be inplace until the review of the NFA. whether or not a decision to recat was taken.

As I've said, we have not surprisingly been are fed a large serving of BS from this trough feeders in Cantberra.

If they were treating ANY other sector of the community with such contempt, their would have been calls for a Royal Commission echoing from Perth to Sydney, Melbourne to Darwin.....long ago. Lawful gun owners are the easy target.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Oldbloke » 19 Oct 2016, 7:58 pm

I assume you mean this when you say trough feeders.

pig-eating-trough.jpg
pig-eating-trough.jpg (78.67 KiB) Viewed 5687 times


My guess is the pigs are smarter.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: Now I'm a member. :unknown:
Hunt safe. A bit more bang is better.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13399
Victoria

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by darwindingo » 19 Oct 2016, 9:28 pm

Oldbloke wrote:
THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: That would be nice !

But, unfortunately we would all be more likely to simultaneously find a pot of gold at the end of a frigin Rainbow before that will ever happen...

I believe this is how it works...

1. Compile enough $ to "BUY ACCESS" to them (AKA. a "Bribe" in the real world), Although I think the preferred term is enormous "Party Donation"..

2. They will do "WHATEVER" it takes to get enough votes to be in power.. ;)

:drinks:
“Accidental Discharges” DO NOT OCCUR !!

An "Unintended Discharge" is nothing more than the lack of appropriate safety procedures or the failure to follow them..!

I love my country, but fear my government.
User avatar
darwindingo
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 596
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by duncan61 » 19 Oct 2016, 9:59 pm

Does anyone need more than 5 shells and probably one up the spout in a hunting shotgun.Trap and skeet you need a double barrel that you can spend any amount of money on to customise
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by darwindingo » 19 Oct 2016, 10:23 pm

Yes, as I miss jamming a ferret down a rabbit warren and shooting 1 for 1 ( some times we would get 7-8 or more on occasion) make a break for it in rapid succession ) took time and practice to become proficient enough to really quickly slip another few rounds in the old Browning 5 shot, to get them all.... The quick reflexes developed saved many ferrets on the numerous occasions that they were in "tow" so to speak :lol: Always could have got more if we had more rounds available ! We did lose one or two ferrets in the early stages.. :oops:

:drinks:
“Accidental Discharges” DO NOT OCCUR !!

An "Unintended Discharge" is nothing more than the lack of appropriate safety procedures or the failure to follow them..!

I love my country, but fear my government.
User avatar
darwindingo
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 596
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by duncan61 » 19 Oct 2016, 11:06 pm

Thank you.You have answered the question.I was thinking ducks forgot about rabbits.If you need a tool or firearm for a certain purpose you should be able to get it.After the buyback a mate who ran a 1200Ha sheep farm obtained permission to have a .22LR semiauto cause he said he needed it.He did it to prove a point.
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by wade06 » 20 Oct 2016, 6:30 am

http://www.iceng.com.au/2016/04/27/adle ... xtensions/

I see that some gunsmiths in Australia are legally extending the lever action magazine to allow up to 10 shots.

You can't import but you can modify. Are there states where it is illegal to own these modified lever actions? Again I don't think that a 7 shot Adler should be the first gun law to get changed.
Walnut Lithgow La101 .22LR - Vortex Diamondback HP 3-12x42
Tikka T3 Lite .243W - Burris Fullfield II 4.5-14x42
User avatar
wade06
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 180
New South Wales

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Gwion » 20 Oct 2016, 6:43 am

wade06 wrote:http://www.iceng.com.au/2016/04/27/adler-a110-magazine-extensions/

I see that some gunsmiths in Australia are legally extending the lever action magazine to allow up to 10 shots.

You can't import but you can modify. Are there states where it is illegal to own these modified lever actions? Again I don't think that a 7 shot Adler should be the first gun law to get changed.


Not legal in All states. Some states only allow fixed mags of original capacity.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by wade06 » 20 Oct 2016, 8:16 am

On one website it says "Modification of the five-shot gun to make it an eight-shot gun is legal in all states apart from NSW"

If this is the case I don't know why Senator David Leyonhjelm is making such a big thing about legalising the 7 shot Adler? :wtf:

Personally i'd rather a 5+ shot pump or semi-auto but at least its an option for those who need it.
Walnut Lithgow La101 .22LR - Vortex Diamondback HP 3-12x42
Tikka T3 Lite .243W - Burris Fullfield II 4.5-14x42
User avatar
wade06
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 180
New South Wales

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Wylie27 » 20 Oct 2016, 8:28 am

He is butthurt and he is trying to sway the shooting vote...

Also maybe he likes being in the news.

I think its ridiculous to think that five shots good seven shots bad.

To me the Adler itself isnt the issue, its the straw that broke the camels back and has made the shooting community realise we need to unite and fight..
Wylie27
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 885
New South Wales

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 20 Oct 2016, 9:23 am

Oldbloke wrote:
happyhunter wrote:
Oldbloke wrote:.............THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR THEM.

THEY DONT. THEY WOULD BE SACKED IN THE REAL WORLD.


Actually, I dont think that is strictly correct..

The system was design as far as I'm concerned, as a means to convey the will of the people to the Parliament, and hence forth for the representative to VOTE in accordance with the WILL of his/her constituents.

There should ideally be little if anything that these individuals need to decide for themselves when voting....problem is the will is rarely conveyed to the representatives, other than a general 'feeling' of the community, or the extremely toxic vocal minority that is invariably and conveniently confused for the sentiment of the community as a whole, example, free the refugees and same-same marriage.

The party (policy) vote is treasonous to the people, as is the conscience vote crap... they should be voting per the will of the people,

Example, if Member of Parliament Bugalugs, had the majority of his electorate turn up to his office on Monday morning and stated that their 'will' was such that they wanted income tax to be fixed at a flat 10%....

Then its his DUTY to stand in Parliament and demand the same.

This concept would appear absolutely ALIEN to most of the brain-dead conditioned pop-cultured face-booking diversified de-gendered miscegenated masses......(thanks to the post ww2 cultural revolution that is progressively destroying our society... more and more... day by day)

and THAT's exactly how they prefer the game.

The argument of taking a policy to an election doesnt either hold water as political parties are 'given' control of the vote in parliament "Government" frequently with LESS than the vote of the majority of Australians, current Lib/Nat Gov received 42% of the vote, the Gillard government barely more than a third of the vote.

Oligarchy....that exactly fits our example of 'government'.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by doc » 20 Oct 2016, 9:55 am

wade06 wrote:I don't know why Senator David Leyonhjelm is making such a big thing about legalising the 7 shot Adler? :wtf:


I wonder if the issue might be related to the ban in the first place, and the methods / logic used to come to that conclusion. (aka all fear mongering, and nothing based on logic).

To me, the issue here isn't 5 vs 7 shots, it's the way legal firearm owners are being treated, the fear, lies, misinformation and other methods used to introduce more restrictions.
doc
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 200
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by happyhunter » 20 Oct 2016, 10:05 am

Too much talk of "need", not enough talk of "rights". Genuine reason is a con job.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Oldbloke » 20 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm

<<Genesis93>> wrote:
Oldbloke wrote:
happyhunter wrote:
Oldbloke wrote:.............THE POLITITIONS ARE PAID TO MAKE RATIONAL LAWS BASED ON FACTS AND GOOD SENSE FOR THE BETTER OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR THEM.

THEY DONT. THEY WOULD BE SACKED IN THE REAL WORLD.


Actually, I dont think that is strictly correct..

The system was design as far as I'm concerned, as a means to convey the will of the people to the Parliament, and hence forth for the representative to VOTE in accordance with the WILL of his/her constituents.

There should ideally be little if anything that these individuals need to decide for themselves when voting....problem is the will is rarely conveyed to the representatives, other than a general 'feeling' of the community, or the extremely toxic vocal minority that is invariably and conveniently confused for the sentiment of the community as a whole, example, free the refugees and same-same marriage.

The party (policy) vote is treasonous to the people, as is the conscience vote crap... they should be voting per the will of the people,

Example, if Member of Parliament Bugalugs, had the majority of his electorate turn up to his office on Monday morning and stated that their 'will' was such that they wanted income tax to be fixed at a flat 10%....

Then its his DUTY to stand in Parliament and demand the same.

This concept would appear absolutely ALIEN to most of the brain-dead conditioned pop-cultured face-booking diversified de-gendered miscegenated masses......(thanks to the post ww2 cultural revolution that is progressively destroying our society... more and more... day by day)

and THAT's exactly how they prefer the game.

The argument of taking a policy to an election doesnt either hold water as political parties are 'given' control of the vote in parliament "Government" frequently with LESS than the vote of the majority of Australians, current Lib/Nat Gov received 42% of the vote, the Gillard government barely more than a third of the vote.

Oligarchy....that exactly fits our example of 'government'.



I agree. Just failed to mention the bit about representing us. Which I have mentioned many times. So shoud get sacked any way.

"To me, the issue here isn't 5 vs 7 shots, it's the way legal firearm owners are being treated, the fear, lies, misinformation and other methods used to introduce more restrictions."

Again agree. I find much of what media and the Polly's say bloody offensive.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: Now I'm a member. :unknown:
Hunt safe. A bit more bang is better.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13399
Victoria

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by p3seven » 20 Oct 2016, 2:43 pm

It is a sideshow to take the heat off Brandis..The idiot senator ( who says he is on our side). Spoke openly about "deals" when he should have negiotated quietly.

The PM seized the opportunity to show how tough he was and everybody else weighed in. The Brandis scandal is forgotten and the PM now has a big stick to beat the States around the head with. Poor Bugger Me.
Henry 22lr
Savage ll BTVS 22lr
Howa 1500 243 W
User avatar
p3seven
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 154
Queensland

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by happyhunter » 20 Oct 2016, 2:48 pm

I think it was more labor appearing to take the moral high ground and try and make the government appear "soft on guns". Other wise it was all orchestrated by the NFA honchos to tune the general public to support more restrictive gun laws.

Really, does the difference between 5 and 7 shot capacity really matter in terms of perceived public safety?
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 20 Oct 2016, 4:51 pm

happyhunter wrote:I think it was more labor appearing to take the moral high ground and try and make the government appear "soft on guns". Other wise it was all orchestrated by the NFA honchos to tune the general public to support more restrictive gun laws.

Really, does the difference between 5 and 7 shot capacity really matter in terms of perceived public safety?


I see it as the difference between 5 and 6 shots....it beyond ridiculous to say one is more 'lethal' than the other and poses a threat to the safety of the community....while the other is sweet, and can pass through our borders... just brainless nonsense....

And the talk about watering down JWHs gun laws... no one actually mentions the no-mag restriction for shotties is legal in most/all states!!

What the talk from the other side proves is that the reds (Labor) are vehemently against guns....and the talk about "it was the libs in 96 NOT Labor" is just a fantasy...
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Oldbloke » 20 Oct 2016, 7:41 pm

For those interested Senater David Leyonhjelm is on. ABCs 24 Late Line tonight at 9.30
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: Now I'm a member. :unknown:
Hunt safe. A bit more bang is better.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13399
Victoria

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Baronvonrort » 20 Oct 2016, 8:35 pm

Oldbloke wrote:For those interested Senater David Leyonhjelm is on. ABCs 24 Late Line tonight at 9.30


Thanks for that will turn on the TV.

With all the fuss over the Adler we need greater unity with shooters voting, depending on whose numbers you believe we could have over 800,000 shooters or going by the Crimtrac annual report there are 1,9 million firearm license holders.

The crimtrac annual report is no longer online did anyone save a copy and if so would they like to share it?

Considering how close the last few elections have been if we had more unity shooters could decide who gets to run the country.
Baronvonrort
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 908
New South Wales

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by Gwion » 20 Oct 2016, 8:59 pm

1/ the 7 shot Adler is not illegal or banned; just prohibited from import.

2/ the whole 5 good/7 bad thing is just a way of trying to back door them into the same category as pump and semi.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by bones-350 » 20 Oct 2016, 9:27 pm

There's an engineer in Adelaide who can modify the Adler from a 5 shot to a 7 shot for a few $100.

I assume its perfectly legal otherwise the S.A. Govts puppets (SAPol) would have shut him down by now.
Marlin.22lr, Marlin17 hmr, Marlin.22wmr, Weatherby action Krieger.223rem, Howa action,Krieger 243w, Ruger 7mm.RM, Rem30.06 & Adler
User avatar
bones-350
Private
Private
 
Posts: 69
South Australia

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 21 Oct 2016, 9:21 am

Here oldbloke, fixed it with some 'context'

Image

^-those types are right now deciding on the future of lever shotguns in Aus...Melbourne Meeting of ministers....

My 'waters' are telling me they'll have their 5th? go at trying to 'convince' the recalcitrant state ministers that 'for the children' and 'for the safety of the community' they MUST get on board .... the on-board is the NFA that was finalised LONG ago...

By the end of the day will lever action shotties join Lever centrefire in Cat B...???

And if so, will a mag limit be placed on all fixed mag cat B.... (as I think about how many 44RemMag round I can jam into the win92....)

Adlers to Cat B, if so a 5 Round mag limit would be a certainty :thumbsdown:
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Gun laws not negotiable.

Post by sandgroperbill » 21 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm

sandgroperbill
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1083
Western Australia

PreviousNext

Back to top
 
Return to Victorian gun laws