wrenchman wrote:i would go 7.62x39 ammo is cheeper to get and will do what you want the 300 and the 7.62x39 are real close all the guys that have 6.5 are hand loaders
SCJ429 wrote:The 762 x 39 biggest downside is that it uses 311 projectiles. If you chambered a 308 barrel in it you would have a winner.
The Grendel is very accurate also, you could load it to shoot subsonic if you wanted to.
The 300 has a very narrow focus but if that is what floats your boat.....
JimTom wrote:SCJ429 wrote:The 762 x 39 biggest downside is that it uses 311 projectiles. If you chambered a 308 barrel in it you would have a winner.
The Grendel is very accurate also, you could load it to shoot subsonic if you wanted to.
The 300 has a very narrow focus but if that is what floats your boat.....
Yeah mate agree about the .311 projectiles and the 7.62x39. Pity they aren't .308. Would be a winner there. That as I see it is the only advantage the 300AAC has over the 7.62x39.
Plus I have a surplus of .308 130gn projectiles that'd like to use. Still that's no reason to buy a rifle in that calibre.
JimTom wrote:I did do a search before asking however nothing recent on this forum. A few people talking down the 300AAC as a fad. Be interested in people's thoughts, regardless of whether you own a rifle in these chamberings or not.
in2anity wrote:Even if the BO becomes truly regarded as a “fad”, doesn’t that mainly effect the cost of factory ammo? Handloading for the BO will basically exclude you from this issue especially considering compatibility with 30cal and front-locking lugs. And if you load it down like it’s kinda supposed to be used, barrel life should be long..
JimTom wrote:No mate not after that kind of accuracy mate. My 6.5Creedmoor is my accurate longer range hitter. My 308 pretty good also.
Considering I have a Creedmoor I have been leaning away from the Grendel, and more towards the Blackout. Only want it for <100M.
in2anity wrote:I shot this 50m 8-shot experimental group in my 308 bolt gun recently; a full case of Trail Boss under the aforementioned Berry's bullet:
The one shot that's a bit low was me pulling the trigger at the wrong time - that's just ludicrous accuracy IMO given how little it cost to cook
Getting back to your BO requirements - you should try and get a heavier barrelled carbine if possible - perhaps the Ruger Ranch?
SCJ429 wrote:Would Trail Boss in your 308 do everything that you were hoping to do with the 300? I think that a 45/70 with Trail Boss is a pretty good alternative to the Blackout.
bigrich wrote:after looking at some ballistics on these rounds, it seems like their a bolt action in the 30-30 niche . not a critisism , just a observation . the 6.5 would have superior accuracy at distance i would imagine i have considered a ruger bolt gun in 44 mag as a 100 yard rifle, but the jury's still out on that for me the 300 BO does sound interesting
SCJ429 wrote:What I see missing in your gun safe is a 375, 416 or a 458.
SCJ429 wrote:I think that a 45/70 with Trail Boss is a pretty good alternative to the Blackout.
JimTom wrote:reduced loads of AR2206H would do what I want.
You are right, I don’t really need it, but where is the fun in that.
Any excuse for a new rifle.
in2anity wrote:SCJ429 wrote:I think that a 45/70 with Trail Boss is a pretty good alternative to the Blackout.
IMO I don't think so - the 45/70 will consume a lot more Trail Boss than the BO, and probably be less accurate. Not to mention the 45/70 will shoot more rainbow and consume more lead.
in2anity wrote:bigrich wrote:after looking at some ballistics on these rounds, it seems like their a bolt action in the 30-30 niche . not a critisism , just a observation . the 6.5 would have superior accuracy at distance i would imagine i have considered a ruger bolt gun in 44 mag as a 100 yard rifle, but the jury's still out on that for me the 300 BO does sound interesting
The BO vs 30/30 is the obvious parallel to draw, but the BO should be more accurate (in a bolt gun that is). I'm speculating here (never owned a BO) but the BO (vs 30/30) should also be more suited to the handloader; the smaller case means you can operate in the faster powder region, equating to better economy than the mid-burns. The front locking lugs of the bolt gun (vs the 30/30's rear locking lugs) should equate to less case stretch and longer brass life, not to mention I'm guessing the brass will be thicker on the modern BO cartridge compared to the 30/30 (looking at the pressure specs).
wanneroo wrote:I know there are subsonic 308 loads you can do, I've shot subsonic 308 in a bolt gun with suppressor and it's pretty damn quiet.
However, one advantage for those with bolt guns is 300 BO is a 223 sized action, so if you don't want to carry the extra weight of a 308, this is where it can come into play. I have AR semi auto rifles in both and carrying around the 308 AR rifle is a totally different proposition to the 300 BO AR. 300 BO is light and handy, 308 is not.
in2anity wrote:wanneroo wrote:I know there are subsonic 308 loads you can do, I've shot subsonic 308 in a bolt gun with suppressor and it's pretty damn quiet.
However, one advantage for those with bolt guns is 300 BO is a 223 sized action, so if you don't want to carry the extra weight of a 308, this is where it can come into play. I have AR semi auto rifles in both and carrying around the 308 AR rifle is a totally different proposition to the 300 BO AR. 300 BO is light and handy, 308 is not.
Sadly ARs aren't really a think down here.