Yeah gordicans good for him not wanting to use a brake because he has to wear hearing protection but in my opinion not wearing hearing protection whilst shooting a firearm is not in ones best interest that bloke made it a personal thing not to have a brake but sitting beside someone at a rifle range would be a different matter as people are at close proximity and consideration has to be given to other shooters but hunting is a different matter only my wife or myself go shooting and we both wear hearing protection and i'm already half deaf as far as any given rifle not needing a brake well that depends on the shooter it's easy for blokes that haven't had injuries to bang on about not needing them but for those blokes that have had injuries and want to shoot bigger calibers then a brake makes sense in some ways and if the caliber becomes too much for me i'll just hand it to one of my sons and use my smaller rifles we all have shot big rifles with no brakes and never needed them and with no ear protection in our younger days but some of us smarten up as we get older and don't knock our bodies around any more for nothing but on saying that without my old shoulder injury and arthritis I dare say I wouldn't even consider a brake
I prefer not to wear hearing protection if I can get away without it. But with a brake it's a definite requirement.
I spent my life smashing the hell out of my right hand/wrist/forearm/shoulder, and it's a mess. Most stuff I can shoot okay without complaining too much. The Mosin-Nagant beats me up, although I've never worked out why the Mosins are so vicious in recoil when Lee-Enfields, '03-A3 and Mausers are almost gentle in comparison. But my biggest problem is 12ga. Even though the velocities and pressures are low, the shotguns just kill my shoulder.








