Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Rifle scopes, iron sights and optics. Spotting scopes and target acquisition devices.

Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by effex » 04 Jun 2014, 9:07 am

I realise there will be factors like glass and build quality which make this a bit difficult, but general information would be good still :)

For example, seems you can get a similar quality fixed 4x for more or less the same price as a variable 3-9x.

Might be a bit less, but isn't 1/3 the price.

Just wondering why you'd limit yourself to the fixed zoom when you can have the more flexible option for basically the same coin?
effex
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 38
Northern Territory

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by bigfellascott » 04 Jun 2014, 11:38 am

Hard one to answer really. I come from the era when fixed was the norm (no variable really around in those days) but today it seems to be the opposite with pretty much variable only options for the most part, I have both and the variables are good for as you said their flexibility side of things, I guess the low powered fixed would be more suited to wooded country where long shots aren't an option.

I still use fixed powered scopes on my 222 and 22 - both have been there for 30yrs and I see no sense is swapping them out now since they do the job no worries at all.
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Kater » 05 Jun 2014, 8:22 pm

effex wrote:For example, seems you can get a similar quality fixed 4x for more or less the same price as a variable 3-9x.


Mmm, at a glance maybe.

For the same price a fixed scope usually has better glass that a variable.
Savage Model 25 Lightweight Varminter 204 Ruger
Leupold VX-2 6-18x40mm

Savage Model 11/111 BTH 30-06 Springfield
Bushnell Elite 3-9 40mm
User avatar
Kater
Private
Private
 
Posts: 85
Victoria

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Tinked » 05 Jun 2014, 8:33 pm

It's simpler to make a fixed scope.

Less parts, less space needed.

For the same price they're usually a bit better like Kater said.

Depends on what you want/need though.
User avatar
Tinked
Private
Private
 
Posts: 82
Australian Capital Territory

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by BBJ » 05 Jun 2014, 8:35 pm

Tinked wrote:Depends on what you want/need though.


Exactly.

If it's a workhorse of a rifle for short range hunting, you'll just be set on the bottom magnification with a variable all the time anyway.

Might as well get something lighter and/or cheaper and/or better in a fixed magnification scope.
Weatherby Vanguard .223 Remington
Tikka T3 Varmint Stainless .243 Winchester
R.I.P. M1 Garand .30-06 Springfield

Leupold VX-R 4-12x40
User avatar
BBJ
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 347
Northern Territory

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Herdsman » 05 Jun 2014, 8:37 pm

BBJ wrote:Might as well get something lighter


Yep, usually a lot smaller objective lens on fixed scopes.

They're definitely lighter (in general).
Shepherding bullets down range.

Tikka Hunter Stainless Fluted 300 Win Mag
Tikka Battue Lite .308 Win
Tikka Varmint Stainless .222 Rem
User avatar
Herdsman
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 312
Victoria

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Manimal » 05 Jun 2014, 8:39 pm

Herdsman wrote:Yep, usually a lot smaller objective lens on fixed scopes.

They're definitely lighter (in general).


I've been looking at this lately.

The Leupold FX-II 4x33mm is 260 grams.

The VX-1 4-12x40mm is 330 grams.

They're both the same price.

Hmmm.
User avatar
Manimal
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 145
New South Wales

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by MeccaOz » 05 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm

It's been my understanding they also take a little bit of inaccuracy out of the equation too.
User avatar
MeccaOz
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1013
Western Australia

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Bourt » 06 Jun 2014, 1:37 pm

MeccaOz wrote:It's been my understanding they also take a little bit of inaccuracy out of the equation too.


Because of no moving parts I guess.
User avatar
Bourt
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 559
Queensland

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by sha » 06 Jun 2014, 1:43 pm

MeccaOz wrote:It's been my understanding they also take a little bit of inaccuracy out of the equation too.


I'd clarify that with it depends on the scope.

On the lower end of things there can be issues with a scope not returning to the same POI after a series of adjustments.

On the higher end though there pretty good at that.

Probably doesn't matter to most but yeah...
Savage Axis The Definition of Accuracy

Savage 93 .22 WMR
Savage 93R17 .17 HMR
Savage 110FP .308 WIN
User avatar
sha
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 160
Tasmania

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Lorgar » 06 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm

sha wrote:On the lower end of things there can be issues with a scope not returning to the same POI after a series of adjustments.

On the higher end though there pretty good at that.


I did the old "square test" with my Elite 6500 at 150m and it came back perfect.

3 shots then 20 clicks - repeated that up, right, down then left back to original spot.

The next 3 shots went through the same clover as the first 3, so a good scope is definitely capable of it.
User avatar
Lorgar
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2177
Victoria

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Combat_Wombat » 06 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm

Just taking a stab in the dark I think the higher price could be from the smaller number of fixed scopes made
Remington 700 CDL .270
Rossi M92 44mag
CZ 452 deluxe .22LR
Howa 1500 .204
Savage FVSR 22
User avatar
Combat_Wombat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 379
Queensland

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by wrenchman » 08 Jun 2014, 3:24 am

Most of it is choice but if you are looking threw the glass weather at the low end or hi range on variable scopes you might have some distortion its because of the movement of the lens.

It is not a big deal for hunters and hi end scopes have adjustable adjective lens target shooters like fixed scopes.

I don't no the type of terrain you hunt in or shoot but most the time a fixed scope is fine.
wrenchman
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1401
United States of America

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Elek » 09 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm

wrenchman wrote:if you are looking threw the glass weather at the low end or hi range on variable scopes you might have some distortion its because of the movement of the lens.


Lens lenses of glass in a fixed zoom compared to a variable one too.

Lose a little less light, and no distortion because everything's fixed where it needs to be to be just right.
Remington 700 SPS Tactical in .308 Win
Remington 700 XCR Tactical Long Range in .223 Rem
Bushnell Elite Tactical ERS 4.5-30x 50mm
User avatar
Elek
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 141
Western Australia

Re: Why get a fixed-zoom scope over a variable?

Post by Klem » 09 Jun 2014, 12:27 pm

Combat_Wombat wrote:Just taking a stab in the dark I think the higher price could be from the smaller number of fixed scopes made


That would make sense.

Same as cars. Sedan vs wagon vs coupe price tags.

You get less car in a coupe and it's 30% more $ than the sedan.
User avatar
Klem
Private
Private
 
Posts: 65
South Australia


Back to top
 
Return to Scopes, sights and optics