


then they get paid out, part of the game


Bugman wrote:I am a man of few words. She can leave her shotgun under my bed anytime.



RoginaJack wrote:OK, name a party that doesn't promise the Sydney harbor bridge to another party for support when presenting a bill to parliament?
This storm in a teacup is no darn different. Labor is just upset 'cause their promises didn't get them elected!

JimTom wrote:I hear she has just resigned. I agree with you Bugman. She is a bit of alright.

:thumbsup:Bugman ,you reckon you could handle the recoil?.
![]()



Well by the sounds of the corruption and shinanigans with the politicians ''Ned Kelly '' could be a start 

Marksman .''So who do we have in his place''?Well by the sounds of the corruption and shinanigans with the politicians ''Ned Kelly '' could be a start
![]()


solarpak wrote:Folks,
BMcK did the wrong thing - pure and simple. Lets get over this bull that just because she was pro-shooting she did no wrong.
David Lleyjohnhelm was a prominent pro-gun pollie until he foul mouthed one of his political rivals and ended up on the scrap heap.
You make your bed and you lie in it....................we are all accountable for our actions.
C.





To me the minister in question has acted exactly as I would hope all our ministers/members of parliament would.
Sarco



solarpak wrote:Folks,
being an avid reader of one of the biggest shooting mags in Oz (wont stipulate which mag) all we used to see was countless pages in every issue contributed to this now ex-pollie and how she championed our cause.
I commend her for that ..............
solarpak wrote:but in the wash-up of this fiasco we as shooters got towelled up by the media because of the grant she gave to that clay target club she was a member of. You didn't hear anything else about other grants ....
solarpak wrote:the clay target club was right in the crosshairs of the largely anti-gun media and Bridgets days were numbered.
let me pose this question ......if she was a non-shooter .........would it be different???



