Syfen wrote:Also having fired .22's, .223's, .243's, 308' and .270's I believe that the .223 is a good balance to really learn.
What would your advise be, I now of or have fired rifles in most calibre's is the .223 a good place to start or is there another calibre that I should start with?
Welcome mate.
Yep, I'd say .223 is a good calibre to learn on, because...
1) People who start shooting on larger stuff like a .308 or .270 often develop a flinch because they're not used to the recoil. Once learned it's hard to unlearn a flinch and you'll shoot worse until you undo the damage. Starting with a low recoil cartridge is a good idea.
2) Any of the 'large rifle' cartridges are going to be expensive compared to the .223. As far as centre fire stuff goes the .223 is common as muck which keeps costs. (Maybe not relevant but not all 'small rifle' cartridges. Go with a less common one and ammo cost can go right up again. Not a problem with the .223.
3) A 22LR is good. Definitely the undisputed king when it comes to cheap shooting as $7 - $8 gets you 50 rounds. Limited range though of course. A 22LR is a 50m - 100m rifle at best. A .223 is a 500m cartridge no problems, so will let you reach out further and learn more.
You can't have everything of course so you'll have to pick one calibre or the other for point 3). Pros and cons either way, but no major complaints against the .223.
Good shooting
