deye243 wrote:If like ruger it will mean varmint target
Ziege wrote:Don't get a 308 tho, 6.5x55 or 7mm08 or a 270 or 25-06 or something just not a 308 lol
Ziege wrote:Haha nah I just think the performance of a 308 Compared to other rounds is woeful
in2anity wrote:
Ok, because I'm bored, I'll bite.
There is nothing wrong with the 308, across all disciplines. "Woeful" is very strong word. I don't here many Palma shooters calling the 308 "Woeful".
Instead of focusing on the intricacies of (similar) calibers, I feel one should be pouring their focus on rifle selection instead of caliber. The realisation of accuracy overwhelmingly comes from the shooter, gun and ammo-quality (before such calibre nuances). If you get a heavy barrel on a quality action and bed, there are lots of different calibers that will get you out to 1000m with similar results. Everybody gets so hung up on the "trendy" calibre when they should really be thinking about and sourcing the exact rifle + barrel contour for their specific needs. Accuracy overwhelmingly comes from the barrel/action/bed, less so the caliber. I stress the word less here - of course intrinsic calibre properties are a factor.
Getting back to 308, here's some positives with the venerable 308. Brass is common, and therefore can be cheap. 308 can usually shoot cheap milsurp 7.62 ammo. 308 projectilces are common, and therefore can be cheap. 30 cal projectile choice is currently much wider than say 6.5cm. Light 30 cal pills can be cheaper than many of the more "specialised" calibers. Check out the range of light Speer bullets in 30cal. Throat erosion occurs faster with a faster pill. 308 has has about 36% more frontal surface area than the 6.5cm; all other things being equal, a bigger bullet will make a bigger hole, cause more tissue damage, and result in more blood loss.
Be careful with generalisations my friend. Sure if money is not a concern, and you want to be able to brag to your friends that you have the latest, technically most "efficient" caliber gun, go ahead and buy the 6.5cm. And yes it will shoot very well. But the 308 has been kicking arse for a very long time, in a staggering amount of different applications.
Ziege wrote:The light pills destabilize and are inaccurate after a short distance, can't be helped width vs length. The heavy pills are slowwwwww... My main beefs with it.
Ziege wrote:Well personally all I own that goes slower than 3100fps is 12G and 22LR
SCJ429 wrote:In competition it has its limitations and given a choice, most shooters who want to do well would choose another case.
in2anity wrote:SCJ42
In competition it has its limitations and given a choice, most shooters who want to do well would choose another case.[
Well that really depends on the type of comp, doesn't itI get it's far from the best for Benchrest or F-Class, but they are both niche.
SCJ429 wrote:I am not sure of any competition where the 308 is the case of choice. The popularity of the case is based on it being used by the US military and the fact that it is quite capable and does nothing badly. If you love it, then get one and it will serve you well.
Ziege wrote:Personal preference
Blr243 wrote:Dj. does not reload. Maybe the price of ammo is part of the reason for the 308 .... ppu factory ammo is only a dollar a shot ......feral pigs don’t walk away from it
SCJ429 wrote:But that is his way of saying the 308 is too common and not high performance enough for him. Most people follow the most successful and popular thing, I see that in V8 Supercars where the majority of people support Red Bull Racing or people think Muhammad Ali is the best boxer ever. He sees value in a different case, that is a good thing.
It is good to follow what interests you, the more obscure the better. Compared to my 30BR, the 308 is a powerhouse. No need for 308 lovers to get defensive, it is not everyone's cup of tea and there are already vast amount of owners to support the case.
Ziege wrote:Don't get a 308 tho, 6.5x55 or 7mm08 or a 270 or 25-06 or something just not a 308 lol