












Blr243 wrote:In an effort to help TT find an answer I googled muzzle blast injury or something like that but I really only saw a medical document that was too complex to understand and very random in its layout ......and when I just read number ones post about hearing loss and suppressors it gave me an idea ...I don’t or rarely use protection in the field because it dulls my senses and my second shot follow up and quick new target acquisition is compromised.....supressors would give me protection and keep my senses at full alert but they are not permitted. ......I think the definition of a surpressor is something fitted or could be fitted to the barrell of a rifle for the purpose of sound reduction ( something like that ) .....then I thought ..... what if a 250 mm long , 75 mm diameter tube were fitted with no baffles and no end cap ....surely this is less nasty for the operators ears , but does not reduce the sound from the point of view of somebody 500 m away ? So maybe that could be considered legal .... and maybe it would be less harsh on the ears. ...... not thought this though properly.....only just thought of it.
Rifle stock and pistol grip reproduction.
Rifle stock and pistol grip reproduction.


AussieCapitalist wrote:I often wonder about my grandfather who was a WW2 veteran. My nan said he was nearly deaf when they married when he was about 28 years old back in the 50s. The range is noisy enough for me so imagine how loud being in WW2 would have been. No wonder all the old war vets were blind, deaf etc. Think of all the trauma that pressure from explosions and such would do to the human body. They really were the greatest generation.

TassieTiger wrote:
Was watching a doco last night on WW1 /WW2 artillery - FMD.
You could see so much rubble from the muzzle blast of those big guns, Shrapnel rocks flying everywhere the first few shots - just off the charts. Those heroes probably didn’t know better re TBI - but still, most of today’s people wouldn’t be able to stand anywhere near one - let alone operate a 4 man crew, like an oiled machine firing 10 rounds a minute...for hours...with another huge gun only meters away....whilst being shot at...and also looking for their own incoming...in 6ft of mud...etc etc etc.


Ziege wrote:..

AussieCapitalist wrote:I often wonder about my grandfather who was a WW2 veteran. My nan said he was nearly deaf when they married when he was about 28 years old back in the 50s. The range is noisy enough for me so imagine how loud being in WW2 would have been. No wonder all the old war vets were blind, deaf etc. Think of all the trauma that pressure from explosions and such would do to the human body. They really were the greatest generation.

TassieTiger wrote:Ever been exposed to prolonged high noise levels?
Ever been subjected to regular concussive force like from large firearms with muzzle brakes?

trekin wrote:
Blackened wrote:That seems like a great idea to me, I must say.
I'd be very interested to see before and after decibel meter readings from this.
Rifle stock and pistol grip reproduction.

