Why such powerful calibres ever got developed?

Calibres, cartridges, ballistics tables and ammunition information.

Re: Why such powerful calibres ever got developed?

Post by defau » 29 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm

Hilux2003 wrote:The only way to "regulate the burn" of black powder is to vary the granule size, because it all (pretty much) goes bang at the same time. Just think explosion - which is what black powder does - explode. Nitro stuff actually burns & does not explode. a controlled burn rate (by either physical design or chemicals used) varies the rate to suit pretty much all case sizes & designs.


Aren't there some explosives that "decompose rapidly" too? Don't burn or explode?

Think I saw that on Future Weapons or somewhere.
Sako L46 .222
Remington 721 .270
CZ 242 .22
User avatar
defau
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 38
Western Australia

Re: Why such powerful calibres ever got developed?

Post by RoginaJack » 04 Jul 2014, 4:13 pm

Walt68 wrote:I used to have access to a 120mm, shooting out to 4000 metres is a lot of fun, but these days stick to a .338 WM for the big stuff.



My favorite was the 105mm recoil-less Rifle with a 50cal mounted on top for sighters. If ya lined up the bunny right, you had shredded rabbit on a tossed warm salad n massed spuds on the side. I kid you not, the rabbits were HUGE!
Boom, Boom! Tikka, Tikka, Boom! Shoot first, video later.
User avatar
RoginaJack
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1410
Queensland

Re: Why such powerful calibres ever got developed?

Post by jackles » 06 Jul 2014, 8:09 am

RoginaJack wrote:My favorite was the 105mm recoil-less Rifle with a 50cal mounted on top for sighters.


Not sure how the Recoilless rifle ever got the 'rifle' label, hey :lol:

I can see a few differences to my normal shooters here :lol:
32-20 Winchester 9422
.22LR Remington Model 5
.308 Remington 700
Coming soon... 17HMR
User avatar
jackles
Private
Private
 
Posts: 56
Queensland

Re: Why such powerful calibres ever got developed?

Post by RoginaJack » 06 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm

jackles wrote:Not sure how the Recoilless rifle ever got the 'rifle' label, hey :lol:

I can see a few differences to my normal shooters here :lol:


Yeah, had me confused too. Could be a carry over from what it replaced.

Cheers.
Boom, Boom! Tikka, Tikka, Boom! Shoot first, video later.
User avatar
RoginaJack
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1410
Queensland

Re: Why such powerful calibres ever got developed?

Post by Herdsman » 07 Jul 2014, 10:52 am

I expect it's just a result of lazy labelling over the years.

I couldn't tell you them all but there are man-held and mounted versions of what fits the 'recoilless rifle' description. Some old, some modern. Some with rifling, and some smooth bore which would technically be 'recoilless guns', not rifles, whether they're man-held or not.

A soldier isn't taking a grammar test after all. He just needs to know how to use the thing.

Easier to just call them all the same thing which is what has happened I guess.
Shepherding bullets down range.

Tikka Hunter Stainless Fluted 300 Win Mag
Tikka Battue Lite .308 Win
Tikka Varmint Stainless .222 Rem
User avatar
Herdsman
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 312
Victoria

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Calibres, cartridges and ballistics