tom604 wrote:they are not a long range gun,,more a scrub gun imho,50 to 75 mtrs would be the average range,the 30-30 has plenty of hitting power close in but loses it pretty quickly when you try and stretch its legs.
dorpel wrote:Thanks for replies guys.
Winchester 94 eh? I do like those straight bottom stocks... It's an option for sure.
I know it's not a .308 for the range and that's fine.
Trying some new things, something classic, good fun
dorpel wrote:You know what I mean
tom604 wrote:at two or three its a different story but first you would have to hit it
roob wrote:tom604 wrote:at two or three its a different story but first you would have to hit it
I do like the idea of levers, but seeing 5 inch groups at 100m like a lot of them seem to shoot makes me sad![]()
Norty_Country_Bloke wrote:I wouldn't mind a lever .357mag or .44mag for hunting in the thick bush. Leaned more towards the .44 Remington Magnum. Any of you blokes got any first hand experience with these things?
Norty_Country_Bloke wrote:I wouldn't mind a lever .357mag or .44mag for hunting in the thick bush. Leaned more towards the .44 Remington Magnum. Any of you blokes got any first hand experience with these things?
Combat_Wombat wrote:Yeah unless it was a super hot load with a ballistic tip projectile I wouldn't be using it on deer
wrenchman wrote:Yes in the east part of the country it is still one of the top white tail calibers/ guns
Norty_Country_Bloke wrote:I wouldn't mind a lever .357mag or .44mag for hunting in the thick bush. Leaned more towards the .44 Remington Magnum. Any of you blokes got any first hand experience with these things?
Old Fart wrote:tom604 wrote:they are not a long range gun,,more a scrub gun imho,50 to 75 mtrs would be the average range,the 30-30 has plenty of hitting power close in but loses it pretty quickly when you try and stretch its legs.
I'd give it a bit more credit than that personally.
It's not a long ranger, but still plenty of power at 100m.