rc42 wrote:"fast track" after sitting on the application for 12 weeks is an odd concept that only government could come up with.
The approval process seems to be little more than validating the ID documents and then looking up our history on their computer system, they should be able to turn all applications around on the same day that the ID check completes but they choose to drag it out for months for who knows what reason, maybe poor system design or incompetence or just to make the process appear more complex and thorough than it actually is.
I had a friend that went through full security vetting for the army, they sent out senior officers (retired) to do personal interviews with all of his family and close friends, WLB certainly don't do anything like that and probably don't even move from their chairs throughout the process.
bigrich wrote:i put in a pta for a 22lr , 24.5 hrs later i got the approval email
Jumanji wrote:Approval email received today not even 3 full business days after receiving a fast track approval.
cathari5 wrote:I got mine (A+B) yesterday, took 3 months, and now wait another 2 weeks till after they do " quality assurance checks have been undertaken" do you have any idea`s what that might mean?
Cool fish wrote:Hi guys, any timelines for H licence?
Macross wrote:Cool fish wrote:Hi guys, any timelines for H licence?
Get ready for a long wait mate. Its taking longer and apparently acording to the guy i spoke on the phone to last week, they have about 4000 new applications in the queue and a few thousand renewals. Not to mention PTA's. Buckle up for 20 odd weeks from time you submit it.
dreysi wrote:Applied for license on 14th of March, photos taken at post office around March 19th. Permit to acquire March 23 and 26. Should I time my expectation (to receive my license so i can at least go shooting with Dad using his rifles) from photos at post office? If so I have,,,,,,,,, probably 6 months to forever to wait.....
Buster21 wrote:dreysi wrote:Applied for license on 14th of March, photos taken at post office around March 19th. Permit to acquire March 23 and 26. Should I time my expectation (to receive my license so i can at least go shooting with Dad using his rifles) from photos at post office? If so I have,,,,,,,,, probably 6 months to forever to wait.....
Have you received anything yet? I applied a couple weeks after you
emmteecee wrote:Submitted my application in the last week of Feb. Received the approval email yesterday. So, about 19/20 weeks. Now a 2ish week wait for the actual license I guess. I put in a PTA in March, when should I hear back about it?
emmteecee wrote:Submitted my application in the last week of Feb. Received the approval email yesterday. So, about 19/20 weeks. Now a 2ish week wait for the actual license I guess. I put in a PTA in March, when should I hear back about it?
Dear Minister
Weapons Licence Processing Time Impacting Access to Organised Sport
As the incumbent Minister for Sport, I am writing to you with a request to assist me to understand why an application for a weapons licence should take 15 to 20 weeks as currently advised by the Queensland Police Service (QPS) website: https://www.police.qld.gov.au/weapon-licensing/when-will-my-weapons-licence-application-be-processed
Queensland Labor does not appear to have a publicly stated position in terms of the party’s views towards firearm ownership as far as I can tell from reviewing: https://www.queenslandlabor.org/labor/policy-platform. Of relevance to my inquiry and request for assistance, Queensland Labor has an extensive policy platform regarding sport under the banner of Caring and Secure Communities. Labor’s beliefs, as documented in the State Platform – 2019, in terms of sport and recreation validate my request:
"8.294 Access to, and participation in, organised sporting and recreational activities enhances the quality of life of all Queenslanders. Labor believes in giving Queenslanders access to a wider range of local quality sporting and active recreation infrastructure.
8.297 The values of fair play should be embraced, and policies and guidelines should be implemented to ensure a quality sport experience for all participants."
Currently, I am not in a position to participate in the sport of rifle shooting and, in my view, the delay to engage in the activity appears to be excessive.
According to the QPS (https://www.police.qld.gov.au/weapon-licensing/performance-audit-regulating-firearms), the Queensland Audit Office (QAO) conducted a performance audit and published the audit results as Regulating Firearms - Report 8: 2020-21 (the “Report”). The objective of the audit was to assess whether the QPS “effectively regulates the acquisition, possession, use and disposal of registered firearms to ensure community safety” (Report Appendix B).
The Report (p.2) found that the:
"QPS does not have the right balance between affording procedural fairness for licence applicants and managing community safety."
This finding is reflected in Recommendation 4 of the Report and is agreed to by the QPS in their response given at Appendix A, where the QPS commits that it will:
"… incorporate business rules and quality assurance reporting to ensure timely identification of issues."
Unfortunately, identification of an issue and investigation and resolution of an issue are not equivalent commitments, but I assume that the QPS are committed to meaningful action rather than mere bureaucratic activity.
From my perspective as a licence applicant, I have difficulty seeing that balanced procedural fairness is being provided by the QPS in a timely fashion. As a general principle, members of the community have a right to expect timely performance from the public service. This is why I am seeking your assistance. Unfortunately, the audit did not report on application turnaround times that is a notable shortfall in the quality of the audit that I find disappointing. If this aspect of application processing performance had been reviewed, it may have provided the insight that I am seeking.
I recognise that the time frames noted in Appendix B to respond to the audit’s recommendations have not yet run to their conclusion. Even so, I would value your feedback to help me understand why this process should take up to three working months to complete (acknowledging that the first month probably accounts for no meaningful action given that it represents a “cooling off” period), especially when the Report notes at p.8 that:
"The unit’s automated vetting system efficiently searches multiple databases to check a firearm applicant’s history, including whether the person has a drug, violence or weapons offence or a domestic violence order against them."
If the application process has such efficient automated vetting systems, then what is the reason for the lengthy processing time? Is the delay due to lack of personnel and/or management commitment or some other resourcing shortfall?
My respectful request is that you advocate, on my behalf, for government focus on the reason for the long licence turnaround time with a view to reducing it to the greatest extent practicable, as an interim measure until implementation of the Report’s recommendations are completed. This advocacy would assist in providing community concerned and responsible citizens, like myself, with access to the sport of rifle shooting without excessive delay.
I look forward to any advice or insight that you can pass on when you get the opportunity. Furthermore, I am most grateful for any assistance you can provide to help me understand the issues that I have raised.
Yours faithfully ...
str8shutr wrote:First post.
I'm about 8 weeks into the licence application process. Based on the QPS website and info here, I've decided to try and shake up the bureaucracy by writing letters to my local member and ministers for Police (Mark Ryan) and Sport (Stirling Hinchliffe):
https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/ministers-portfolios.aspx
In the interests of collaborative effort, I've copied the outline of the letter that I drafted that may be useful to others to modify to suit personal circumstance. I've referred back to Labor's policy platform to shine a light on where the government is falling short of its commitments to the electorate. My local member is with another party, so I used a similar approach again focussing on rifle shooting as a sport and his party's policies.
It's a bit long but, as with any complex issue, it takes some explaining to bring the threads of an argument together. By all means, do what you can to make the wording work for you. Or start afresh. Looks like you've got months of time, so that's not a barrier..
All the bestDear Minister
Weapons Licence Processing Time Impacting Access to Organised Sport
As the incumbent Minister for Sport, I am writing to you with a request to assist me to understand why an application for a weapons licence should take 15 to 20 weeks as currently advised by the Queensland Police Service (QPS) website: https://www.police.qld.gov.au/weapon-licensing/when-will-my-weapons-licence-application-be-processed
Queensland Labor does not appear to have a publicly stated position in terms of the party’s views towards firearm ownership as far as I can tell from reviewing: https://www.queenslandlabor.org/labor/policy-platform. Of relevance to my inquiry and request for assistance, Queensland Labor has an extensive policy platform regarding sport under the banner of Caring and Secure Communities. Labor’s beliefs, as documented in the State Platform – 2019, in terms of sport and recreation validate my request:
"8.294 Access to, and participation in, organised sporting and recreational activities enhances the quality of life of all Queenslanders. Labor believes in giving Queenslanders access to a wider range of local quality sporting and active recreation infrastructure.
8.297 The values of fair play should be embraced, and policies and guidelines should be implemented to ensure a quality sport experience for all participants."
Currently, I am not in a position to participate in the sport of rifle shooting and, in my view, the delay to engage in the activity appears to be excessive.
According to the QPS (https://www.police.qld.gov.au/weapon-licensing/performance-audit-regulating-firearms), the Queensland Audit Office (QAO) conducted a performance audit and published the audit results as Regulating Firearms - Report 8: 2020-21 (the “Report”). The objective of the audit was to assess whether the QPS “effectively regulates the acquisition, possession, use and disposal of registered firearms to ensure community safety” (Report Appendix B).
The Report (p.2) found that the:
"QPS does not have the right balance between affording procedural fairness for licence applicants and managing community safety."
This finding is reflected in Recommendation 4 of the Report and is agreed to by the QPS in their response given at Appendix A, where the QPS commits that it will:
"… incorporate business rules and quality assurance reporting to ensure timely identification of issues."
Unfortunately, identification of an issue and investigation and resolution of an issue are not equivalent commitments, but I assume that the QPS are committed to meaningful action rather than mere bureaucratic activity.
From my perspective as a licence applicant, I have difficulty seeing that balanced procedural fairness is being provided by the QPS in a timely fashion. As a general principle, members of the community have a right to expect timely performance from the public service. This is why I am seeking your assistance. Unfortunately, the audit did not report on application turnaround times that is a notable shortfall in the quality of the audit that I find disappointing. If this aspect of application processing performance had been reviewed, it may have provided the insight that I am seeking.
I recognise that the time frames noted in Appendix B to respond to the audit’s recommendations have not yet run to their conclusion. Even so, I would value your feedback to help me understand why this process should take up to three working months to complete (acknowledging that the first month probably accounts for no meaningful action given that it represents a “cooling off” period), especially when the Report notes at p.8 that:
"The unit’s automated vetting system efficiently searches multiple databases to check a firearm applicant’s history, including whether the person has a drug, violence or weapons offence or a domestic violence order against them."
If the application process has such efficient automated vetting systems, then what is the reason for the lengthy processing time? Is the delay due to lack of personnel and/or management commitment or some other resourcing shortfall?
My respectful request is that you advocate, on my behalf, for government focus on the reason for the long licence turnaround time with a view to reducing it to the greatest extent practicable, as an interim measure until implementation of the Report’s recommendations are completed. This advocacy would assist in providing community concerned and responsible citizens, like myself, with access to the sport of rifle shooting without excessive delay.
I look forward to any advice or insight that you can pass on when you get the opportunity. Furthermore, I am most grateful for any assistance you can provide to help me understand the issues that I have raised.
Yours faithfully ...
BigB1 wrote:That is gold - good onya. Keep us posted on the responses and any improvement in processing times please