geoff wrote:"Prosecutors hate this one simple trick! Open this link to learn how to play WAPOL at their own game!"
Mate if it was that easy, people wouldn't have been getting done for this, not infrequently, for years. If anyone stands up in court, with case law precedent behind them, and says that a case is not a "component of ammunition", it's not the Police that will get laughed out of court.
The proposed definition is lightyears better than the current one. I dislike most of the amendments but not that specific one.
Oldbloke wrote:"find it a very simple defense, it should be sufficient for the Police to drop the case before it goes to court"
You hope.
My understanding is there have been a fair few convictions for just cases laying around.
Bladeracer I would not be so confident if I was you. (unless your a WA lawyer specialising in firearms)
It's fine to interpret this stuff if you want, we all do that. But in the court it could easily turn out to be wrong. And then there is "case" law.
womble wrote:I think it would be unwise to challenge the police in that hermit kingdom.
womble wrote:Do bikie gangs really collect their spent casings after drive by shootings. And then reload them.
The legislation specifically targets sporting shooters. And exactly nobody else.
Oldbloke wrote:I guess are they getting convictions is the question? Or is it a www myth?
womble wrote:Increase of licenced gun ownership 60% in 13 years.
Keep up the good work WA
womble wrote:Increase of licenced gun ownership 60% in 13 years.
Keep up the good work WA
noneyabussiness wrote:so, it turns out ( from shooters union) that the pictorial reference above from that paper is actually ACCURATE, those are the actual houses containing firearms... WTF ... just released personal info to crims on where firearms are stored...
bet they were hoping the crims will steal a few and it will be easier to use the excuse " public safety " to push these bs laws through...
noneyabussiness wrote:so, it turns out ( from shooters union) that the pictorial reference above from that paper is actually ACCURATE, those are the actual houses containing firearms... WTF ... just released personal info to crims on where firearms are stored...
bet they were hoping the crims will steal a few and it will be easier to use the excuse " public safety " to push these bs laws through...
ash_hendo wrote:Who comes up with this stuff?? Are they are simply trying to make it so hard everyone gives up?....... Trouble is, the actual problems don't go away, as violent people with no morals will still find a way to be violent people with no morals. I suspect none of this regulation will make a scrap of difference....... It's just the every day honest people who get screwed over and lose a nice hobby.....
Oldbloke wrote:noneyabussiness wrote:so, it turns out ( from shooters union) that the pictorial reference above from that paper is actually ACCURATE, those are the actual houses containing firearms... WTF ... just released personal info to crims on where firearms are stored...
bet they were hoping the crims will steal a few and it will be easier to use the excuse " public safety " to push these bs laws through...
Come on. Your pulling our legs.
on_one_wheel wrote:Somebody think about the children
It has been revealed the number of unlicensed knives in the state had soared by 60 per cent, with dozens of knife owners on every suburban street.
Baseball bats, house bricks and bottles are also being amassed in alarming numbers across the state.