Fionn wrote:Its pretty standard in most/all CAT's for the reason listed. Saves the applicant paying massive legal fee's if they lose.
Justice for the ordinary people.
wanneroo wrote:The problem with police in Australia is that they are these huge statewide bureaucracies with no local elected accountability as we have here in the USA.
The police in Australia have way too much political power and seem to have forgotten their job is to enforce laws not craft or advocate for them or lobby for them. They seem to spend their time pushing their political agenda rather than building cases on criminals.
Fionn wrote:Generally they don't award costs if representing yourself, although if you are allowed to be represented by a lawyer they will consider awarding costs if merited, still its a higher bar then a court as it depends on the nature of the case, parties involved, nature of the dispute etc.
An advantage of representing yourself is that you will be given way more leeway with procedural matters, evidence and it will be taken into account during the case by the Member.
This isn't granted to the government/police.
wanneroo wrote:The problem with police in Australia is that they are these huge statewide bureaucracies with no local elected accountability as we have here in the USA.
The police in Australia have way too much political power and seem to have forgotten their job is to enforce laws not craft or advocate for them or lobby for them. They seem to spend their time pushing their political agenda rather than building cases on criminals.
Oldbloke wrote:Disagree.
They are removing your choice. The police are attempting to put you at a disadvantage. They know if you don't have a lawyer present they will likely win whether they are right or wrong. Clearly the police will have someone at the hearing with plenty of experience. The average shooter does not.
And I am starting to think others here who believe the country is becoming a police state are right.
Oldbloke wrote:
Your own words speak volumes.
QLD Police are deliberatly disadvantaging shooters. And you think its funny.
You don't belong here.
Fionn wrote:How unsurprisingly xenophobic of you![]()
I guess that is one of the great things about Australia, we allow the moronic access to the justice system while still looking out for them and making sure they don't make the situation worst for themselves.
on_one_wheel wrote:Something special isn't he, a real cut above the rest ... atleast in his mind.
What a douche
womble wrote:I want Fionns imput.
I must insist he stays.
We don’t need an echo chamber here, a rounded perspective is more beneficial
on_one_wheel wrote:Probably belongs on a wannabe Police style forum or some other similar extreme right wing fascist style forum
bigrich wrote:i agree with you . robust debate is the cornerstone of democracy . the right to state your point of veiw and why you think it's valid .
the problems arise when people can't agree to disagree and the "discussion" turns into a name calling mud slinging match . just like federal politics ......![]()
having said that , i don't agree with fionn
Oldbloke wrote:Agree, but in the case of fionn it isn't debate. It's just an argument with the aim of pissing members off.
bigrich wrote:while i support debate ,you are a bit of a argumentative sh1t stirrer fionn . i do get the impression your just trying to wind fellas up . your argument about legal representation for people fighting WLB wouldn't pass the pub test buddy .
All parties involved in a matter before QCAT must represent themselves.
The tribunal’s purpose is to provide a quick, inexpensive avenue to resolve disputes between parties and make decisions.
on_one_wheel wrote:Perhaps it would make sense to deny everyone legal representation in ALL cases so as to save costs ... said no one ever, other than perhaps the qld police who's cases are probably so flimsy they wouldn't hold up against a fresh out if law school, legal aid lawyer.
Since when did the police start caring how much Joe Bloggs spends on representation?
Sounds extremely fishy, I'm amazed it's even legal.
Personally I think QLD police have something to hide like an unfair, biased and dishonest system.