Oldbloke wrote:You be the judge.
Personally I anneal.
https://youtu.be/BCRIw1PQOK4?si=T558APi6JzrB3QfU
Larry wrote:Two reasons I anneal. first is to try and get a consistent neck tension. In order to improve accuracy. Second is to prolong the life of the brass.
bigpete wrote:Never have. I've reloaded some cases 10 times or more. At the rate I shoot I lose them long before I would need to anneal them
Oldbloke wrote:You be the judge.
Personally I anneal.
https://youtu.be/BCRIw1PQOK4?si=T558APi6JzrB3QfU
Larry wrote:Two reasons I anneal. first is to try and get a consistent neck tension. In order to improve accuracy. Second is to prolong the life of the brass.
Larry wrote:A big big condition on annealing however is that it really only adds value if you can anneal each case consistently as the previous case. Otherwise you are making a bigger mess of the brass than you started with when they were all hard and stiff. at least they were all the same.
Wyliecoyote wrote:John you may recall the writing of Harold Vaughn where he tested the neck tension effect on group size where he had concluded that it had such a small effect on group dispertion that only the most accurate benchrest rifles using matched cases with uniformly turned necks benefited. The experiments he ran using cases of both spectrums of light and heavy neck tension showed less than a thickness of a sheet of paper change in vertical dispersion. In terms of thousands of pounds of pressure inside the case upon firing, the difference in dislodging the bullet from the neck in terms of pressure and at what point in that pressure curve was negligible. He did conclude that it was a small sample test but noone has proved him wrong as far as i know. Now how his experiments tie in with annealing is that I have heard a lot of hearsay but never seen any anecdotal evidence that shows a non turned neck or even fully turned neck cartridge suddenly becomes more accurate through annealing. I have not seen any accuracy gain through the annealing of my benchrest cartridges from 6PPC, 6BR, 30BR and a host of long range benchrest wildcats using an AMP or any other form of annealing. All i saw was easier sizing, loading and extended case life. As you are well aware the biggest gain for long term accuracy is recent times has been the change to shoulder bumping with small base body dies and neck collets or even some form of full length sizing which is common place amongst Fclass shooters. The only benefits of annealing are as stated, easier sizing and longer case life but not at extreme pressure that may expand primer pockets. Anything claimed beyond that is hearsay where i await anecdotal proof to say otherwise.
JohnV wrote:That is true , brass can also harden with age and from a process called , " stress corrosion " When the case neck is under stretching tension from a seated projectile the brass will also start to harden . The work hardening is from the static load . This can also increase Stress corrosion effects that attack the zinc in the brass and promote splitting and neck welding because the neck starts to shrink in diameter and the neck tension gets much higher than when originally loaded and the jacket and case neck can start to fuse together in extreme cases but I have seen it . The picture is an example of a projectile jacket starting to fuse in a reload case neck after 10 years storage . Exposing brass to amines like caustic soda or ammonia is bad and promotes age hardening and stress corrosion . Mild organic acids do no harm to brass as far as changing it's structure .
Ultrasonic cleaners should have something like orange juice in them not any kind of amine or alkaline liquid .
When cleaning a gun with ammonia based solvents one should make sure the chamber and lug recess is fully cleaned and patched out so no excess solvent gets onto the brass . Lug recess area can be swabbed and dried with round dental pads .
get a round dowel and drill a hole sideways at the very end and squeeze the dental pad in , cut it's length to fit and it can be twisted around inside the lug recess . Also prevents excess solvent and oil from pooling and then traveling down into the stock and damaging wood or bedding via the barrel threads and front action screw over time . Damaging consistent accuracy .
I absolutely proved over a 10 year test period that pure Moly coating on projectiles significantly decreased neck welding compared to uncoated projectiles . There is two situations that people refer to as " neck welding " . 1/ a large increase in neck tension . 2/ When the jacket metal fuses chemically with the inside case neck metal . The later is real neck welding .
phill55phill wrote:Never done it in 2506 220 swift or 6.5x55 in 50 years
Oldbloke wrote:Sounds to me your saying it gets older with age
No mention of it being work hardened or corrosion due to chemical attack.
Has nothing to do with age.
It's poor annealing combined with corrosion. Simples.
bladeracer wrote:
For 99.5% of us I would say no, especially for pistol shooters.
Most brass is common and fairly inexpensive so the extra cost and effort of annealing probably isn't worth it, get your 10 or 20 loads out of it and replace it with new stuff.
If you're loading moderate loads then the necks will probably start hardening and splitting after ten or twenty loads, and annealing will extend the life of the brass. But for common brass it may just be quicker and simpler to replace it after a while anyway.
If you are loading for a rear-locking action (like a Lee Enfield .303) then it's quite likely the case body will fail before the necks start splitting, so again, annealing really won't extend the life of your brass.
If you run your brass hot then there is also little point as you'll probably lose the primer pockets long before the necks start splitting or hardening.
If you are loading some wildcat that takes time and effort to form the brass, or you're shooting some sort of Weatherby chambering that costs $6 per case to replace, then it may well be worth annealing.
Now, if you're loading for maximum precision then there can be an advantage in annealing every time to give maximum consistency in grip of the bullet.