Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
Faedy wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
Really - are you an active member?
If so you would/should know that they can't do a thing until it is law and the legislation has finished being written.
KC's are waiting ti begin action that very day.
bladeracer wrote:Faedy wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
Really - are you an active member?
If so you would/should know that they can't do a thing until it is law and the legislation has finished being written.
KC's are waiting ti begin action that very day.
I thought they already had the buyback?
Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
Oldbloke wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
I agree, I wouldn't take the $500. Wait and see. I'd bet they will pay a fairer amount if you wait.
Wapiti wrote:My wife gave me a t-shirt that says "I lost my guns in a boating accident".
Be a lot of good guns going out the cop-shop back doors I bet...
Oldbloke wrote:Wapiti wrote:My wife gave me a t-shirt that says "I lost my guns in a boating accident".
Be a lot of good guns going out the cop-shop back doors I bet...
That's how Martin Bryant got them.
bladeracer wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
I agree, I wouldn't take the $500. Wait and see. I'd bet they will pay a fairer amount if you wait.
I thought the amnesty ended when the buyback ended? Now when the legislation goes through if you still own the firearms they simply come and take them for destruction.
bladeracer wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
I agree, I wouldn't take the $500. Wait and see. I'd bet they will pay a fairer amount if you wait.
I thought the amnesty ended when the buyback ended? Now when the legislation goes through if you still own the firearms they simply come and take them for destruction.
bladeracer wrote:At the pistol club yesterday some guys were saying WA just banned handloading last week. I haven't seen anything in that regard yet, is this true?
bladeracer wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
I agree, I wouldn't take the $500. Wait and see. I'd bet they will pay a fairer amount if you wait.
I thought the amnesty ended when the buyback ended? Now when the legislation goes through if you still own the firearms they simply come and take them for destruction.
alexjones wrote:bladeracer wrote:At the pistol club yesterday some guys were saying WA just banned handloading last week. I haven't seen anything in that regard yet, is this true?
Wasn't there talk about banning owning manuals or books on repairing or manufacturing guns? Maybe they were referring to that and they were misinformed? As having load data and such could be seen as manufacturing thus making reloading ilegal?
It is hard to keep track of what is happening in WA. So much conjecture and nothing appears to be law yet.
Wapiti wrote:Story goes now that Albanese and Labor are now going to hit WA hard with funding like Miles did in Qld... they see that Labor have disrespected everybody in WA and enough of a majority now hate Gaybor with a passion, enough to lose them government.
They saw the disgust Qld'ers have for socialist government now.
So go in hard people, support the Nats that stick up for you and make sure you tell the hopeless Libs what you expect too...
alexjones wrote:Wapiti wrote:Story goes now that Albanese and Labor are now going to hit WA hard with funding like Miles did in Qld... they see that Labor have disrespected everybody in WA and enough of a majority now hate Gaybor with a passion, enough to lose them government.
They saw the disgust Qld'ers have for socialist government now.
So go in hard people, support the Nats that stick up for you and make sure you tell the hopeless Libs what you expect too...
So far with 70% of the vote counted labor has 33% of the vote and the greens 9%. Thats nearly 40% of the state. So as much as I hate socialists that is not showing disgust thats 40% of the people who are scumbags!
Wapiti wrote:alexjones wrote:Wapiti wrote:Story goes now that Albanese and Labor are now going to hit WA hard with funding like Miles did in Qld... they see that Labor have disrespected everybody in WA and enough of a majority now hate Gaybor with a passion, enough to lose them government.
They saw the disgust Qld'ers have for socialist government now.
So go in hard people, support the Nats that stick up for you and make sure you tell the hopeless Libs what you expect too...
So far with 70% of the vote counted labor has 33% of the vote and the greens 9%. Thats nearly 40% of the state. So as much as I hate socialists that is not showing disgust thats 40% of the people who are scumbags!
Who's using the word "scumbags"?
I call to your attention how may seats just changed hands from Labor to the LNP?
Might even be a KAP seat yet.
AFAIAC this is exactly the result I reckon it is.
animalpest wrote:Reloading is covered in the new Act. It's allowed
alexjones wrote:bladeracer wrote:At the pistol club yesterday some guys were saying WA just banned handloading last week. I haven't seen anything in that regard yet, is this true?
Wasn't there talk about banning owning manuals or books on repairing or manufacturing guns? Maybe they were referring to that and they were misinformed? As having load data and such could be seen as manufacturing thus making reloading ilegal?
It is hard to keep track of what is happening in WA. So much conjecture and nothing appears to be law yet.
alexjones wrote:bladeracer wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Florey55 wrote:Why aren't the useless SSAA launching a class action on the behalf of WA shooters so they can be correctly compensated ?
Receiving $500 for something you paid $10K + for is damn unfair..
I agree, I wouldn't take the $500. Wait and see. I'd bet they will pay a fairer amount if you wait.
I thought the amnesty ended when the buyback ended? Now when the legislation goes through if you still own the firearms they simply come and take them for destruction.
Am I crazy to think that it was a scare to make people hand in guns before it even becomes law because IT WONT BECOME LAW. There will be some kind of grandfather clause for the ones who held the line. Everyone who handed in their guns did it voluntary before it was even a law. In my mind only a limp wrist does something like that.
Is that a to out there theory?
animalpest wrote:"Anyone who loses a gun for reasons other than exceeding the numerical limits, didn't really want or need that gun to begin with.
If you want or need it, there are ways. The limits suck and shouldn't be even considered - hell the Law Reform Commission Report didn't recomend them."
How on earth do you come that conclusion? And I am intrigued with the "ways". Can you please explain?
animalpest wrote:"Anyone who loses a gun for reasons other than exceeding the numerical limits, didn't really want or need that gun to begin with.
If you want or need it, there are ways. The limits suck and shouldn't be even considered - hell the Law Reform Commission Report didn't recomend them."
How on earth do you come that conclusion? And I am intrigued with the "ways". Can you please explain?